File scan report
Verdict Malicious
Is Relay Gram. zip safe? No, we rate this exact file malicious.
Twenty-two of the 68 antivirus engines that checked it flag this password-protected archive, with Kaspersky and Trend Micro naming the Cridex worm and Malwarebytes calling it spyware.
Strong evidence · Two or more major antivirus engines agree.
Delete the archive without extracting it. If it was already opened on a machine, run a full scan with your security software kept enabled and change passwords for the accounts used on that device, particularly messaging and banking accounts.
What to do now3 steps
This ZIP archive is harmful. Don't open or extract it, and delete it.
If you haven't opened or extracted it
Don't open or extract this archive. Delete the archive and any files you extracted from it, then empty the Recycle Bin or Trash.
If you already opened or extracted it
If you already extracted it, delete the extracted files too and run a full antivirus scan.
If a page it opened asked for a password or card details and you entered them, change that password and call your bank.
If you opened or installed it
Avoid banking and sign-ins on that device until it is clean. These free MalwareTips guides walk you through it.
- Trojan removal guideClear steps for Windows, Mac and Android. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Antivirus results
22 of 68 flagged
- Flagged 22
- No detection 46
- No result 7
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Completed
- First seen 1mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
6 points against it and 3 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
The archive was flagged by 22 of the 68 antivirus engines that checked it, five of them high-reputation, and Kaspersky and Trend Micro both name the Cridex family while Malwarebytes labels it a stealer. The sandbox unpacked a Windows executable from it using the common "infected" password, a habit that keeps the inner payload away from filters and static scanners. Automated execution did not visibly detonate, but that is common for stealers that stall under inspection.
The detection spread is broad and independent: 14 distinct engine families flagged the archive, and the high-reputation detections are not a single shared engine. Kaspersky and Trend Micro both name Cridex, while Sophos, Trellix and the BitDefender-derived cluster call it a generic trojan and Malwarebytes labels it spyware, which points to a credential-stealing worm rather than a mislabelled installer. Prevalence is low (one submitting source, first seen on Oct 1, 2026) and no reference database lists the hash, so the public record adds nothing either way. The sandbox summary is the only contrary note: the combined sandbox verdict was clean, no injected processes and no outbound traffic, but the archive only unpacked its executable with the standard password, so the inner payload was never meaningfully exercised. With that many corroborating high-reputation detections and a named family, the archive warrants deletion rather than trust.
What We Detected
This is a ZIP archive holding a Windows executable. 22 of the 68 antivirus engines that checked it flagged it, including five high-reputation engines counted as independent votes after collapsing vendors that license the same scan engine. Kaspersky reports Worm.Win32.Cridex and Trend Micro reports Worm.Win64.Cridex, both naming the Cridex family; Malwarebytes labels the archive as spyware/stealer, and K7 antivirus and Rising add worm-oriented labels. Others, including Sophos, Trellix and the BitDefender-linked cluster, fall back to generic trojan names.
Threat Behavior
The archive is password protected with the widely used "infected" convention, and the analysis environment needed that password to unpack an executable with the same name as the archive into a temporary folder. That packaging is not itself malicious, but it is a standard way to stop mail gateways and static scanners from inspecting the payload inside. Two sandbox runs finished with a clean overall result and recorded no outbound connections, no injected processes and no persistence changes; the only defensive mapping noted is a defence-tampering label without the corresponding artefact, so it is not treated as observed behaviour. The file also carries analysis tags for debugger-environment detection and long sleeps, which are typical of malware that waits when it suspects it is being watched, which would explain the quiet run.
What To Do Now
Treat this archive as unsafe and delete it without extracting it. If it was opened, run a full scan with your security software, keep that protection enabled, and change passwords for any accounts the machine uses, especially messaging and banking accounts, since Cridex-lineage code is built to harvest credentials. Do not redistribute the file to others for testing outside a proper analysis environment.
Where this verdict could be wrong4 caveats
- The combined sandbox result was clean and no hostile network traffic was recorded, so the payload did not visibly detonate during automated execution.
- Several major engines, including ESET-NOD32, Avira, Avast, AVG, DrWeb and F-Secure, returned no detection at all.
- No reference database lists this hash and only one source has submitted it, so the public record is thin for a file this widely flagged.
- The archive was only statically opened, not fully exercised, so a payload that stays dormant when it detects an analysis environment would look quiet.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- Two sandbox runs completed with a clean overall result and no injected processes or outbound connections were recorded
- No malicious dropped file was identified among the extracted items
- No reference database in our checks lists this hash, so nothing points to a known campaign using these exact bytes
- 22 of the 68 antivirus engines that checked it flag the archive, including five high-reputation engines
- Kaspersky and Trend Micro both name Cridex, a credential-stealing worm family
- Malwarebytes labels the contents as spyware/stealer, matching credential theft rather than nuisance software
- The archive is password protected and only reveals its Windows executable after the common "infected" password is supplied, which defeats mail filters and static inspection
- Analysis tags note debugger-environment detection and long sleeps, behaviour typical of code that avoids running under inspection
- The file is rare, submitted by one source, and has no known software history behind it
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in 2 isolated tests; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 2isolated sandbox runs
- 3sandbox rule tags
- 2spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 5filesystem & mutex artifacts
What the test run showed
What the file did on a test computer
Confirmed in the test run
Moderate concern: Checked whether it was running on a test computer.
Note: Read basic details of the test computer, such as its Windows version.
Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as weakening security settings; no setting change was recorded.
This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.
Threat context
How password stealers work
A password stealer runs quietly in the background and copies your private data, such as saved passwords, browser cookies, autofill details and crypto wallets, then sends it to criminals. You usually won't notice anything.
Bottom line:Stolen logins are used to break into your accounts or sold in bulk, so change passwords from another device.
Recorded behavior
What happened in the test
Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.
- 1
Input file
The submitted object
- Evidence 1 of 5: FileSeen in the test run
RelayGram.zip
799c9a5e17e62fa235f29bd9981107b75b557074719f976444e9bfd2ea6c62c0
Uploaded file
- 2
Processes
What ran
- Evidence 2 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
unarchiver.exe
C:\Windows\SysWOW64\unarchiver.exe "C:\Windows\SysWow64\unarchiver.exe" "C:\Users\user\Desktop\RelayGram.zip"
Test run - Evidence 3 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
7za.exe
C:\Windows\SysWOW64\7za.exe "C:\Windows\System32\7za.exe" x -pinfected -y -o"C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\0chvgky2.slf" "C:\Users\user\Desktop\RelayGram.zip"
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Files
Created or changed
- Evidence 4 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
0chvgky2.slf
C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\0chvgky2.slf
Test run - Evidence 5 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
RelayGram.exe
C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\0chvgky2.slf\RelayGram.exe
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
5 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.
What this file did when executed
This file was detonated in 2 sandboxes and its runtime behaviour was observed.
Sandbox verdicts
1- VT: CLEANclean
Techniques observed in the sandbox
3MITRE ATT&CK techniques the sandbox mapped. Highlighted ones are rare in normal software; the others are common in legitimate programs too.
- T1082· System recon
- T1497· Sandbox evasion
- T1562.001· Disables security
Observed activity
Processes started
2Programs the file ran, with their command lines.
unarchiver.exeC:\Windows\SysWOW64\unarchiver.exe "C:\Windows\SysWow64\unarchiver.exe" "C:\Users\user\Desktop\RelayGram.zip"7za.exeC:\Windows\SysWOW64\7za.exe "C:\Windows\System32\7za.exe" x -pinfected -y -o"C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\0chvgky2.slf" "C:\Users\user\Desktop\RelayGram.zip"
Files
5Files the file created, changed or deleted.
- Written
C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\0chvgky2.slf - Written
C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\0chvgky2.slf\RelayGram.exe - Written
C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\unarchiver.log - Written
\Device\ConDrv\\Connect - Written
stdout
Sandbox background — not the file
1The analysis machine's own processes and connections, recorded in every run.
- VM process
conhost.exeC:\Windows\System32\conhost.exe C:\Windows\system32\conhost.exe 0xffffffff -ForceV1
Files this sample writes at runtime
This file drops 2 children at runtime. None are currently flagged malicious in our cache. 2 have no saved verdict and were not checked; that is missing coverage, not a finding.
- a00e13602b27e2cec71a…078f3fNot checkedno saved verdict
- 2a185c0f2f13f732443e…b10f8dNot checkedno saved verdict
Chapter 04
Technical details
22 of the 68 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 22
- BitDefender (major engine)QD:Trojan.GenericKDQ.20E2BC90D5
- Emsisoft (major engine)QD:Trojan.GenericKDQ.20E2BC90D5 (B)
- GData (major engine)QD:Trojan.GenericKDQ.20E2BC90D5
- Kaspersky (major engine)Worm.Win32.Cridex.akfh
- Sophos (major engine)Mal/Generic-S
- TrellixENS (major engine)Artemis!EB0C4411F401
- TrendMicro (major engine)Worm.Win64.CRIDEX.TL0101FB26ZW
- TrendMicro-HouseCall (major engine)Worm.Win64.CRIDEX.TL0101FB26ZW
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Nov 8, 2026, 5:26 PM UTC
- SHA-256
799c9a5e17e62fa235f29bd9981107b75b557074719f976444e9bfd2ea6c62c0- SHA-1
e3cc73944562d5e5e1860f4075d555da7372a5da- MD5
6dbbcc5f8dfb7bb359761bf21d8bc902
About this file
RelayGram.zip is a ZIP file of 29.2 MB.
- Type and size
- ZIP · 29.2 MB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Oct 1, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 1 sourceRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
First scanned
Antivirus consensus
22 of 68 engines flagged this file
7 of the 75 engines returned no result for this file (file type not supported, or the scan did not finish), so they did not check it.
The 22 detections come from 14 independent scan engines: several vendors license the same engine, so their results are one vote.
- Tier-118 engines5flagged8 vendors sharing 5 engines
- Tier-237 engines7flagged11 vendors sharing 7 engines
- Low-trust13 engines3flagged
View all 75 engine results
- ALYacMalicious: QD:Trojan.GenericKDQ.20E2BC90D5
- ArcabitMalicious: QD:Trojan.GenericQ.20E2BC90D5
- BitDefenderMalicious: QD:Trojan.GenericKDQ.20E2BC90D5
- BkavMalicious: W32.Malware.542CFB1D
- CTXMalicious: zip.trojan.generickdq
- DeepInstinctMalicious: MALICIOUS
- EmsisoftMalicious: QD:Trojan.GenericKDQ.20E2BC90D5 (B)
- GDataMalicious: QD:Trojan.GenericKDQ.20E2BC90D5
- GoogleMalicious: Detected
- K7AntiVirusMalicious: EmailWorm ( 006e155a1 )
- K7GWMalicious: EmailWorm ( 006e155a1 )
- KasperskyMalicious: Worm.Win32.Cridex.akfh
- MalwarebytesMalicious: Spyware.Stealer
- MaxSecureMalicious: Trojan.Malware.690617844.susgen
- MicroWorld-eScanMalicious: QD:Trojan.GenericKDQ.20E2BC90D5
- RisingMalicious: Worm.Cridex!8.BB3 (CLOUD)
- SophosMalicious: Mal/Generic-S
- TrellixENSMalicious: Artemis!EB0C4411F401
- TrendMicroMalicious: Worm.Win64.CRIDEX.TL0101FB26ZW
- TrendMicro-HouseCallMalicious: Worm.Win64.CRIDEX.TL0101FB26ZW
- VaristMalicious: W64/ABTrojan.RXVM-0330
- VIPREMalicious: QD:Trojan.GenericKDQ.20E2BC90D5
- AcronisClean
- AhnLab-V3Clean
- AlibabaClean
- alibabacloudClean
- Antiy-AVLClean
- APEXNo result
- AvastClean
- Avast-MobileClean
- AVGClean
- AviraClean
- BitDefenderFalxNo result
- CAT-QuickHealClean
- ClamAVClean
- CMCClean
- CrowdStrikeClean
- CylanceNo result
- CynetClean
- DrWebClean
- ElasticClean
- ESET-NOD32Clean
- F-SecureClean
- FortinetClean
- GridinsoftClean
- huorongClean
- IkarusClean
- JiangminClean
- KingsoftClean
- LionicClean
- McAfeeDClean
- MicrosoftClean
- NANO-AntivirusClean
- PaloaltoNo result
- PandaClean
- SangforClean
- SentinelOneClean
- SkyhighClean
- SUPERAntiSpywareClean
- SymantecClean
- SymantecMobileInsightNo result
- TACHYONClean
- tehtrisNo result
- TencentClean
- TrapmineNo result
- TrustlookClean
- VBA32Clean
- VirITClean
- ViRobotClean
- WebrootClean
- XcitiumClean
- YandexClean
- ZillyaClean
- ZoneAlarmClean
- ZonerClean
How widely this file has been seen
Rarely uploaded, and first seen more than two weeks ago. Often niche legitimate software or internal tooling; not a strong malware signal on its own.
Chapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 8 questions people ask most about this file.
Is RelayGram.zip malware?
What is RelayGram.zip?
How many antivirus engines detected RelayGram.zip?
I already downloaded and opened or extracted RelayGram.zip — what should I do?
How do I remove RelayGram.zip?
What kind of malware is RelayGram.zip?
What is the SHA-256 hash of RelayGram.zip?
How up to date is this analysis of RelayGram.zip?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.