Is hisdbrahmasfiles.exe safe?
Five tier-1 engines flagged this new unsigned executable, with several identifying FleetDeck remote-administration functionality, but no strong family consensus or runtime evidence exists.
The file drew 18 detections among 75 engines, including five tier-1 products. Several engines associate it with FleetDeck or remote-administration software, while its unsigned and newly observed status adds risk; however, the hacktool label is unconfirmed and no completed sandbox observation is available.
7a37cfb32527d80275…13e3f3fb47b4ccRecommended next actions
Before running
Do not run it until the source and publisher can be verified independently.
If you already ran it
Stop using it, scan the device, and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts. Get a fresh copy from the developer's official site or an official app store.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
The file drew 18 detections among 75 engines, including five tier-1 products. Several engines associate it with FleetDeck or remote-administration software, while its unsigned and newly observed status adds risk; however, the hacktool label is unconfirmed and no completed sandbox observation is available.
Five tier-1 engines are among the 18 of 75 engines detecting the executable, which is too substantial to dismiss as low-quality noise. ESET-NOD32, Malwarebytes, and Zillya specifically reference FleetDeck, while Kaspersky identifies generic remote-administration functionality. The executable is unsigned and has appeared in only one submission, so there is no established publisher or distribution history supporting it. Family agreement is not strong, and several detections describe potentially unwanted or dual-use remote administration rather than a conventional trojan. No completed runtime observation or complete contacted-host reputation check is available, leaving the file's actual actions unresolved.
What We Detected
18 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the executable, including five tier-1 products. ESET-NOD32, Malwarebytes, and Zillya associate it with FleetDeck, while Kaspersky describes remote-administration functionality and DrWeb applies a generic trojan signature.
Threat Behavior
The labels suggest remote-access or remote-administration capability that could be legitimate in an authorized environment but abused for unauthorized control. No completed sandbox run is available, so execution, persistence, credential access, or command-and-control activity was not observed. The contacted-host cross-check is also unavailable, so network reputation cannot be assessed completely.
What To Do Now
Do not run the file unless its source, purpose, and expected FleetDeck deployment can be independently verified. Keep endpoint protection enabled, quarantine the sample, and obtain a vendor-authenticated copy or test it in an isolated analysis environment managed by security personnel.
Where this verdict could be wrong5 caveats
- 10 tier-1 engines reported no detection, including BitDefender, Avira, Fortinet, and GData.
- engines.hacktoolConfirmed=false, so FleetDeck-related tool labels do not satisfy the confirmed-hacktool rule.
- externalIntel.yaraify.ruleCount=0, externalIntel.malwareBazaar.hit=false, and externalIntel.circl.hit=false; these absences may reflect intelligence-coverage gaps.
- peAnalysis.highEntropyCode=false and peAnalysis.likelyPacked=false, providing no static indication of packed executable code.
- No runtime conclusion is possible because behaviour=null, and contactedHosts=null leaves network reputation unverified.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 10 tier-1 engines reported no detection
- No strong tier-1 family consensus
- Hacktool classification was not corroborated sufficiently
- No static indication of packed code
- No researcher-curated external-intelligence hit
- 18/75 antivirus detections
- Five tier-1 engine detections
- Unsigned Windows executable
- Only one recorded submission
- Multiple FleetDeck or remote-administration labels
- No completed runtime observation
Quarantine the executable and verify it directly with the organization or vendor that supposedly supplied it before use. Keep endpoint protection enabled and avoid granting administrative privileges.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete18 of 75 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 18 / 75engines flagged
- 1sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
18 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file, including APEX and Avast.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
The hash has been submitted 1 time from 1 source.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
Category: pua
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
18 of 75 engines flagged this file
View all 75 engine results
Section entropy & packers
No high-entropy executable section or known packer signature was detected. Data and resource sections can still have high entropy without indicating packed code.
How widely this file has been seen
Barely seen in the wild and first surfaced recently. 18 antivirus detections make that low prevalence materially relevant, but rarity alone is not proof of malware.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- hisdbrahmasfiles.exe
- Format
- Win32 EXE
- Code signing
- No verified publisher
- Size
- 4.2 MB
- Last analyzed
- Sep 10, 2026, 11:44 PM UTC
7a37cfb32527d80275deb59f1ba6ebfa0c1f4d6b61f0678fcf13e3f3fb47b4ccSafety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
We couldn't fully clear this file. Treat it with caution.
- Recovery step 01
Don't run it unless you're certain it came from a source you trust.
- Recovery step 02
Check where you got it — an unexpected attachment or a random download link is a red flag.
- Recovery step 03
If its origin cannot be confirmed, delete this file and use a fresh copy from a trusted source. Get a fresh copy from the developer's official site or an official app store.
- Recovery step 04
If you're still unsure, scan it again in a day or two — detections often catch up on newer files.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is hisdbrahmasfiles.exe safe, or is it malware?
What is hisdbrahmasfiles.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected hisdbrahmasfiles.exe?
What should I do if I already ran hisdbrahmasfiles.exe?
How do I remove hisdbrahmasfiles.exe?
What kind of malware is hisdbrahmasfiles.exe?
What is the SHA-256 hash of hisdbrahmasfiles.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of hisdbrahmasfiles.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.