Is 67client.jar safe?
Nineteen of 74 engines flagged this newly observed JAR, including six tier-1 detections and several independent Java dropper or Agent labels.
The sample drew 19 detections among 74 engines, with six high-trust engines participating. ESET-NOD32, Fortinet, and Ikarus independently describe a Java Agent dropper, while other engines use GenericGBA or generic Java-trojan labels; avoid opening it and keep endpoint protection enabled.
7a469b4e00ba741ea6…1adcc33cddc5c4Recommended next actions
Before opening or running
Do not open or run it. Delete this Java file from the device, then empty the Recycle Bin or Trash.
If you already opened or ran it
Disconnect from the internet, start a full or offline antivirus scan, then secure important accounts from a clean device.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
The sample drew 19 detections among 74 engines, with six high-trust engines participating. ESET-NOD32, Fortinet, and Ikarus independently describe a Java Agent dropper, while other engines use GenericGBA or generic Java-trojan labels; avoid opening it and keep endpoint protection enabled.
The strongest evidence is the 19/74 detection count, including six tier-1 malicious votes. ESET-NOD32, Fortinet, and Ikarus independently identify Java Agent or trojan-dropper behavior, which provides more specific corroboration than the generic labels alone. The sample is newly observed and has only one recorded submission, leaving no benign prevalence history. The precise family remains uncertain because tier-1 family consensus is not strong and several engines returned different generic names. No completed sandbox observation or complete contacted-host reputation check is available, so the assessment rests primarily on static antivirus evidence.
What We Detected
Nineteen of 74 engines flagged the JAR, including six tier-1 detections. ESET-NOD32 reported Java/TrojanDropper.Agent.IQ, Fortinet reported Java/Agent.IQ!tr, and Ikarus reported Trojan-Dropper.Java.Agent. BitDefender and Emsisoft also matched the GenericGBA Java-trojan signature.
Threat Behavior
The labels indicate a Java trojan or dropper that may install or launch another payload. However, behaviour is unavailable, so no runtime actions were directly observed. contactedHosts is also unavailable, meaning there is no complete host-reputation result for network activity.
What To Do Now
Do not open or run 67client.jar. Quarantine or delete it while keeping antivirus and endpoint protection enabled; if it already ran, disconnect the affected system from sensitive resources and perform a full security scan.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- engines.tier1FamilyConsensus.strong=false; only one tier-1 vote is attributed to the GenericGBA family, so no precise family attribution is established.
- Kaspersky and DrWeb did not detect the sample, and 47/74 engines returned undetected.
- externalIntel.yaraify.ruleCount=0 and externalIntel.malwareBazaar.hit=false provide no researcher or repository corroboration, although absence of a hit does not establish benignity.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 47/74 engines returned undetected
- No strong tier-1 consensus identifies one exact family
- externalIntel.malwareBazaar.hit=false
- externalIntel.yaraify.ruleCount=0
- 19/74 antivirus engines reported malicious content
- Six tier-1 engines contributed malicious detections
- Multiple engines identify Java Agent or trojan-dropper characteristics
- The file is newly observed with only one submission
- No completed runtime analysis is available
Do not execute the JAR; quarantine or remove it and keep endpoint protection enabled. If it was opened, run a full scan and review the system for unfamiliar Java processes or newly created files.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete19 of 74 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Threat context
How downloaders work
This file is a delivery vehicle. On its own it can look small and harmless, but its job is to quietly pull down and install the REAL payload — often a stealer, ransomware, or bot — from a server the attacker controls.
Bottom line:Because the dangerous part arrives later, early scans can look cleaner than the threat really is.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 19 / 74engines flagged
- 1sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
19 of 74 antivirus engines flagged the file, including ALYac and Antiy-AVL.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
The hash has been submitted 1 time from 1 source.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
Category: downloader
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
19 of 74 engines flagged this file
View all 74 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Barely seen in the wild and first surfaced recently. 19 antivirus detections make that low prevalence materially relevant, but rarity alone is not proof of malware.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- 67client.jar
- Format
- JAR
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 3.9 MB
- Last analyzed
- Sep 17, 2026, 11:49 PM UTC
7a469b4e00ba741ea658a4bac40ab979566c9419d8bb4d4bb01adcc33cddc5c4Safety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file is dangerous. Treat it as harmful and remove it.
- Recovery step 01
Don't open or run this Java file. Delete this Java file from the device, then empty the Recycle Bin or Trash.
- Recovery step 02
If you already opened or ran it, disconnect from the internet and start with a full antivirus scan or Microsoft Defender Offline scan. If compromise is suspected or the problem persists, use a reputable second-opinion scanner and follow incident-recovery or clean-reinstall guidance.
- Recovery step 03
If you typed any passwords while it was open, change them from a device you trust.
- Recovery step 04
Get a fresh copy from the publisher's official site and verify its exact hash when possible.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is 67client.jar a virus?
What is 67client.jar?
How many antivirus engines detected 67client.jar?
What should I do if I already opened or ran 67client.jar?
How do I remove 67client.jar?
What kind of malware is 67client.jar?
What is the SHA-256 hash of 67client.jar?
How up to date is this analysis of 67client.jar?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.