Is compiler.exe safe?
Twenty of 75 engines flagged this unsigned executable, while offensive runtime techniques and five researcher YARA matches independently reinforce generic-trojan concerns.
The unsigned executable drew detections from 20 of 75 engines, including six high-trust detections, although no single named family achieved strong consensus. Runtime evidence mapped activity to process injection, token manipulation, and startup persistence, while five researcher YARA rules supplied further corroboration.
7ad4b911d05a12f91a…e2b94f8cd018c9Recommended next actions
Before running
Do not run it. Delete this file from the device, then empty the Recycle Bin or Trash.
If you already ran it
Disconnect from the internet, start a full or offline antivirus scan, then secure important accounts from a clean device.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
The unsigned executable drew detections from 20 of 75 engines, including six high-trust detections, although no single named family achieved strong consensus. Runtime evidence mapped activity to process injection, token manipulation, and startup persistence, while five researcher YARA rules supplied further corroboration.
The detection level is substantial: 20 of 75 engines flagged the sample, including six high-trust detections from products such as Avast, Avira, Sophos, and Symantec. Their labels mostly describe a generic Win64 trojan or agent, so assigning a specific malware family would overstate the available consensus. One completed sandbox run recorded T1055 process injection, T1134 token manipulation, and T1547.001 startup persistence, all of which increase concern even though the sandbox itself did not issue a malware verdict. Five researcher YARA rules also matched, including TLS-callback hunting and a ransomware-associated rule, providing independent static corroboration without proving ransomware behavior. The observed direct-IP contact lacks a complete host-reputation check, so it is not treated as confirmed command-and-control.
What We Detected
Twenty of 75 antivirus engines flagged compiler.exe, including six high-trust detections. Avast used the MalwareX label, while Avira, F-Secure, Sophos, Symantec, and TrendMicro-HouseCall supplied generic agent or trojan labels. The labels do not establish a dependable named family, but their breadth is difficult to explain as a lone heuristic false positive.
Threat Behavior
One completed sandbox observation mapped activity to T1055 process injection, T1134 access-token manipulation, and T1547.001 startup-folder persistence. Five researcher YARA rules also matched, including HUNTING_SUSP_TLS_SECTION, pe_detect_tls_callbacks, and VECT_Ransomware. A direct IP connection to 162.159.36.2 was recorded, but no complete host-reputation result is available, so that connection is not treated as confirmed command-and-control.
What To Do Now
Do not run the executable. Keep endpoint protection enabled, quarantine or remove the file, and examine any system where it ran for unexpected startup entries, injected processes, account-token abuse, and related outbound traffic.
Where this verdict could be wrong4 caveats
- engines.tier1ReportedClean=9, including BitDefender, ESET-NOD32, Fortinet, and GData, so high-trust engines do not unanimously agree.
- behaviour.hasMaliciousSandboxVerdict=false, and no dropped file hashes or saved persistence indicators were recorded in the single sandbox run.
- Three communityComments describe the hash as clean or no-threat, but they have zero votes and are weaker than the independent engine, runtime, and YARA evidence.
- peAnalysis.likelyPacked=false and peAnalysis.highEntropyCode=false, providing no static packing indicator.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- Nine high-trust engines reported no detection
- No malicious sandbox verdict was issued
- No dropped file hashes or saved persistence indicators were recorded
- peAnalysis.likelyPacked=false
- The file has medium prevalence across 811 sources
- 20/75 antivirus detections
- Six high-trust engines reported malware
- Unsigned Win32 executable
- Runtime mapping to T1055 process injection
- Runtime mapping to T1134 token manipulation
- Runtime mapping to T1547.001 startup persistence
Quarantine the file and avoid executing it; if it already ran, perform a full endpoint scan and investigate startup locations, process injection, token abuse, and outbound connections while keeping protection enabled.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete20 of 75 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
Complete1 isolated runtime environment contributed observations.
Network
Partial1 runtime contact was observed without a completed reputation cross-check.
YARA
Complete7 signature or behavior rules matched.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime flight recorder
Capture complete- 1isolated sandbox run
- 19MITRE ATT&CK techniques
- 2spawned processes
- 1network contacts
- 1filesystem & mutex artifacts
What this file does
Observed actions and their security significance
High concern: Injected code into another process, a technique that can conceal execution.
High concern: Used an input-capture technique that can record credentials or keystrokes.
High concern: Changed an auto-start location that can make code run after sign-in or restart.
Moderate concern: Contained obfuscated or packed code that makes inspection harder.
Moderate concern: Communicated over a common application protocol; malware can use this for command-and-control.
Moderate concern: Scans through your files and folders.
Moderate concern: Checked the environment for virtualisation or analysis tools.
These are observed capabilities from an isolated analysis. A technique does not prove malicious intent on its own, and the file never ran on your device.
Threat context
How trojans work
A trojan disguises itself as something useful or harmless to trick you into running it. Once open, it does its real job in the background — anything from stealing data to opening a back door or downloading more malware.
Bottom line:The disguise is the whole trick, so a trustworthy-looking name or icon means nothing.
Attack story
Runtime observations grouped by analysis stage. Arrows organize the stages; they do not claim chronology or causality.
Input file
The submitted object
- FileObserved
compiler.exe
7ad4b911d05a12f91ab27ba3baa351a56653ca099dda7ad87ee2b94f8cd018c9
01Uploaded file
Processes
Runtime execution
- ProcessObserved
Observed process
"C:\Users\user\Desktop\luajit.exe"
02Isolated runtime analysis - ProcessObserved
Observed process
C:\Windows\System32\conhost.exe C:\Windows\system32\conhost.exe 0xffffffff -ForceV1
03Isolated runtime analysis - +1 more recorded observation in Analyst mode
Files
Created or changed
- Written fileObserved
Connect
\Device\ConDrv\\Connect
04Isolated runtime analysis
Network
Hosts contacted
- Contacted hostObserved
162.159.36.2
Contact observed during runtime.
05Isolated runtime analysis
5 recorded facts from one runtime window. Every fact remains independently traceable in Analyst mode.
What this file did when executed
This file was detonated in 1 sandbox and its runtime behaviour was observed.
Adversary techniques mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
- 162.159.36.2
- \Device\ConDrv\\Connect
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 7rule hits recorded
- 20 / 75engines flagged
- 811sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
6 high-confidence signature or behavior rules matched this file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceDerivedSourceSignature and behavior rulesObserved at - 02
20 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file, including alibabacloud and Antiy-AVL.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 03
YARAify matched 5 researcher rules to this file.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at - 04
Scanned file: compiler.exe — 7ad4b911d05a12f91ab27ba3baa351a56653ca099dda7ad87ee2b94f8cd018c9
ProvenanceObservedSourceUploaded fileObserved at - 05
Observed process — "C:\Users\user\Desktop\luajit.exe"
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 06
Observed process — C:\Windows\System32\conhost.exe C:\Windows\system32\conhost.exe 0xffffffff -ForceV1
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 07
File written: Connect — \Device\ConDrv\\Connect
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 08
Contacted host: 162.159.36.2 — Contact observed during runtime.
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
Category: generic-trojan
One or more independent reference databases matched this hash.
Signatures and behavior heuristics
A community signature or high-severity behavioral heuristic matched. Signatures identify known patterns; heuristics are strong leads but are not proof on their own.
- Capability_Embedded_Lua
- golang_bin_JCorn_CSC846
- HUNTING_SUSP_TLS_SECTION
- pe_detect_tls_callbacks
- VECT_Ransomware
The saved runtime evidence maps this activity to MITRE T1055 (Process Injection). The mapping supports possible process injection, but it does not prove the exact injection method or the operator's intent.
Evidence"C:\Users\user\Desktop\luajit.exe"The sample contacted an external IP address directly and no application domain was recorded. Direct-IP traffic also occurs in legitimate installers and infrastructure, so this is supporting context only and requires corroboration from host reputation and other runtime evidence.
Evidence162.159.36.2
20 of 75 engines flagged this file
View all 75 engine results
Section entropy & packers
No high-entropy executable section or known packer signature was detected. Data and resource sections can still have high entropy without indicating packed code.
How widely this file has been seen
Moderate prevalence — neither rare nor common. No strong prior applies.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- compiler.exe
- Format
- Win32 EXE
- Code signing
- No verified publisher
- Size
- 31.2 KB
- Last analyzed
- Sep 14, 2026, 12:25 AM UTC
7ad4b911d05a12f91ab27ba3baa351a56653ca099dda7ad87ee2b94f8cd018c9Safety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file is dangerous. Treat it as harmful and remove it.
- Recovery step 01
Don't run this file. Delete this file from the device, then empty the Recycle Bin or Trash.
- Recovery step 02
If you already ran it, disconnect from the internet and start with a full antivirus scan or Microsoft Defender Offline scan. If compromise is suspected or the problem persists, use a reputable second-opinion scanner and follow incident-recovery or clean-reinstall guidance.
- Recovery step 03
From a different, clean device, change the passwords on your important accounts (email and banking first) and turn on two-factor authentication.
- Recovery step 04
Get a fresh copy from the developer's official site or an official app store.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is compiler.exe a virus?
What is compiler.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected compiler.exe?
What should I do if I already ran compiler.exe?
How do I remove compiler.exe?
What kind of malware is compiler.exe?
What is the SHA-256 hash of compiler.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of compiler.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.