Is OIP (6).png safe?
No detections appeared across 75 antivirus engines, including the reporting tier-1 products, and no threat-intelligence source matched this PNG.
The 39,669-byte PNG produced no malicious or suspicious detections across 75 antivirus engines, with 16 tier-1 products reporting no detection. No external-intelligence match was found, although the exact hash is newly observed and no runtime or contacted-host assessment is available.
7bdeccefd62dccb008…f0bc20a64e4610Recommended next actions
Before viewing
View it only when its sender or download source is one you trust.
If you already viewed it
Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
The 39,669-byte PNG produced no malicious or suspicious detections across 75 antivirus engines, with 16 tier-1 products reporting no detection. No external-intelligence match was found, although the exact hash is newly observed and no runtime or contacted-host assessment is available.
The sample is identified as a PNG image, for which code signing is not applicable. None of 75 antivirus engines flagged it, and 16 tier-1 engines reported no detection. MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, and YARAify produced no match or rule hit. Four prior image-file matches also received clean outcomes, though file-type-only similarity provides limited support. The exact hash is newly observed, and the lack of sandbox and contacted-host results limits conclusions about any content processed by vulnerable image software.
What We Detected
The file is a 39,669-byte PNG image. None of 75 antivirus engines reported a malicious or suspicious detection, and 16 tier-1 engines—including Avast, BitDefender, ESET-NOD32, Kaspersky, and Microsoft—reported no detection. MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, and YARAify supplied no matching threat intelligence.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox observation is available, so runtime behavior was not observed. The contacted-host reputation check was also unavailable; no network conclusion can be drawn from that missing coverage. No malicious family, dropped child, offensive technique, or brand mismatch is present in the supplied evidence.
What To Do Now
The scan evidence supports ordinary image use. Because this exact hash is newly observed, keep endpoint protection enabled and use an updated image viewer, especially if the file came from an unexpected or untrusted sender.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- prevalence.classification=rare_new with 1 submitter and 1 submission — the exact hash has little established history.
- behaviour=null and contactedHosts=null, so runtime activity and contacted-host reputation were not evaluated.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/75 antivirus engines reported a malicious or suspicious detection.
- 16 tier-1 engines reported no detection.
- MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, and YARAify returned no matching threat intelligence.
- The declared file type and MIME type consistently identify a PNG image.
- Four file-type-similar samples have prior 'safe' outcomes.
- The exact SHA-256 has only 1 recorded submission and was first observed recently.
- No completed sandbox observation is available.
- No complete contacted-host reputation result is available.
Normal image handling is reasonable based on the available evidence. Keep endpoint protection enabled and open unexpected files only with fully updated software.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete0 of 75 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 0 / 75engines flagged
- 1sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
No completed runtime observation is available for this file.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceRuntime coverageObserved at - 03
The hash has been submitted 1 time from 1 source.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
0 of 75 engines flagged this file
View all 75 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Barely seen in the wild and first surfaced recently. That limits reputation evidence, but rarity alone is not proof of malware.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- OIP (6).png
- Format
- PNG
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 38.7 KB
- Last analyzed
- Sep 13, 2026, 5:38 PM UTC
7bdeccefd62dccb008f3bfdced5f128495edcda55b9d95b21ff0bc20a64e4610Safety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.
- Recovery step 01
View it only when its sender or download source is one you trust.
- Recovery step 02
A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.
- Recovery step 03
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is OIP (6).png safe?
What is OIP (6).png?
How many antivirus engines detected OIP (6).png?
What is the SHA-256 hash of OIP (6).png?
Is it safe to view OIP (6).png?
How up to date is this analysis of OIP (6).png?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.