Is goodmod-1.1.0.jar safe?
No antivirus engine detected this JAR, but one runtime trace mapped potentially offensive techniques and direct-IP traffic without a completed host-reputation check.
All 73 antivirus engines were free of detections, including 17 tier-1 engines, and the single sandbox produced no malicious verdict. However, runtime mappings to process injection, service execution, and security-control impairment, plus an unchecked direct-IP contact, justify caution until the file’s source and behavior are independently verified.
7d0d5d7887245889aa…a36cf3960966adRecommended next actions
Before opening or running
Do not open or run it until the source and publisher can be verified independently.
If you already opened or ran it
Stop using it, scan the device, and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts. Get a fresh copy from the publisher's official site and verify its exact hash when possible.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
All 73 antivirus engines were free of detections, including 17 tier-1 engines, and the single sandbox produced no malicious verdict. However, runtime mappings to process injection, service execution, and security-control impairment, plus an unchecked direct-IP contact, justify caution until the file’s source and behavior are independently verified.
The strongest reassuring signal is that 0 of 73 engines detected the JAR, including all 17 reporting tier-1 engines. One completed sandbox did not issue a malicious verdict, and none of nine inspected dropped hashes was identified as malicious. However, the runtime record mapped activity to T1055, T1543.002, and T1562.001, which can support offensive behavior even though technique mappings do not establish intent by themselves. The sample also contacted 162.159.36.2 directly, and no complete host-reputation result is available because that check was not saved. With no family consensus, research-rule matches, or similar-file history, the evidence remains mixed.
What We Detected
No antivirus detections were reported across 73 engines, and all 17 reporting tier-1 engines were silent. The sample also had no MalwareBazaar match, no YARAify rule matches, and no attributed threat family.
Threat Behavior
One sandbox run completed without a malicious verdict, but its telemetry mapped activity to T1055, T1543.002, and T1562.001. These mappings suggest possible process injection, service execution, and security-control impairment, although the saved evidence does not prove intent or the exact implementation. The JAR contacted 162.159.36.2 directly; no complete reputation result is available for that IP. Nine dropped hashes were inspected without a malicious finding, but their individual verdicts remain unknown.
What To Do Now
Verify the download against the developer's official release channel and checksum before running it. Keep endpoint protection enabled, and if the source cannot be authenticated, test it only in an isolated environment without sensitive accounts or data.
Where this verdict could be wrong4 caveats
- The single completed sandbox did not issue a malicious verdict, but it mapped activity to T1055, T1543.002, and T1562.001.
- No engine detected the sample, yet signature-based coverage can miss new or highly specialized Java threats.
- No malicious child was identified, but all 9 dropped-child verdicts are unknown rather than confirmed clean.
- The direct IP 162.159.36.2 was not covered by a saved contacted-host reputation check.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/73 antivirus engines detected the file
- 17 tier-1 engines reported no detection
- behaviour.hasMaliciousSandboxVerdict=false
- droppedChildren.hasMaliciousChild=false
- externalIntel.yaraify.ruleCount=0 and externalIntel.malwareBazaar.hit=false
- Runtime mapping to T1055 process injection
- Runtime mapping to T1543.002 service execution
- Runtime mapping to T1562.001 security-control impairment
- Direct contact with 162.159.36.2
- No completed reputation result for the contacted IP
- All 9 dropped-child verdicts remain unknown
Use the file only after confirming its checksum and provenance through the developer’s official release channel. Keep endpoint protection enabled and isolate execution if authenticity remains uncertain.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete0 of 73 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
Complete1 isolated runtime environment contributed observations.
Network
Partial1 runtime contact was observed without a completed reputation cross-check.
YARA
Complete2 signature or behavior rules matched.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime flight recorder
Capture complete- 1isolated sandbox run
- 15MITRE ATT&CK techniques
- 15spawned processes
- 1network contacts
- 15filesystem & mutex artifacts
What this file does
Observed actions and their security significance
High concern: Injected code into another process, a technique that can conceal execution.
High concern: Created or modified a system service, which can keep code running.
High concern: Attempted to impair or bypass security controls.
Moderate concern: Runs hidden system commands (script or shell).
Moderate concern: Transferred a file over the network; malware can use this to fetch additional payloads.
Moderate concern: Checks which security software you have installed.
Note: Collects details about your system.
These are observed capabilities from an isolated analysis. A technique does not prove malicious intent on its own, and the file never ran on your device.
Attack story
Runtime observations grouped by analysis stage. Arrows organize the stages; they do not claim chronology or causality.
Input file
The submitted object
- FileObserved
goodmod-1.1.0.jar
7d0d5d7887245889aae14e858fd6ca8336cc4dc20559310f69a36cf3960966ad
01Uploaded file
Processes
Runtime execution
- ProcessObserved
Observed process
"C:\Program Files\Java\jre-1.8\bin\javaw.exe" -jar "C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\runtime.jar"
02Isolated runtime analysis - ProcessObserved
Observed process
C:\Windows\system32\icacls.exe C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\.oracle_jre_usage /grant "everyone":(OI)(CI)M
03Isolated runtime analysis - +1 more recorded observation in Analyst mode
Files
Created or changed
- Written fileObserved
5792
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_<USER>\5792
04Isolated runtime analysis - Written fileObserved
3903daac9bc4a3b7.timestamp
C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\.oracle_jre_usage\3903daac9bc4a3b7.timestamp
05Isolated runtime analysis - +1 more recorded observation in Analyst mode
Network
Hosts contacted
- Contacted hostObserved
162.159.36.2
Contact observed during runtime.
06Isolated runtime analysis
6 recorded facts from one runtime window. Every fact remains independently traceable in Analyst mode.
What this file did when executed
This file was detonated in 1 sandbox and its runtime behaviour was observed.
Adversary techniques mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
- 162.159.36.2
- C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_<USER>\5792
- C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\.oracle_jre_usage\3903daac9bc4a3b7.timestamp
- C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\.oracle_jre_usage\17dfc292991c8786.timestamp
- C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_user
- C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_user\7084
- C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_user\4464
- /tmp/hsperfdata_root/3569
Files this sample writes at runtime
This file drops 9 children at runtime. None are currently flagged malicious in our cache.
- f9f37e1e64a01dfa81fa…b43fd7Never scannednever seen before
- 239b76f617876a8ceafb…61a177Never scannednever seen before
- 93bfabfa9a77b78b9cbe…f0cb87Never scannednever seen before
- c1de3a9376fdaef0ba6a…308b70Never scannednever seen before
- d87c5f3cdfb5b7c0510e…1ade9eNever scannednever seen before
- 61625fd8b084f70f242d…55abd2Never scannednever seen before
- 50c82f36208ed8040447…2d7843Never scannednever seen before
- 8e8711854186c68e2368…4a3c7cNever scannednever seen before
- 759aafcfa2395ce1b800…2af0f7Never scannednever seen before
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 2rule hits recorded
- 0 / 73engines flagged
- 67sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
1 high-confidence signature or behavior rule matched this file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceDerivedSourceSignature and behavior rulesObserved at - 02
0 of 73 antivirus engines flagged the file.
ProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 03
The hash has been submitted 69 times from 67 sources.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at - 04
Scanned file: goodmod-1.1.0.jar — 7d0d5d7887245889aae14e858fd6ca8336cc4dc20559310f69a36cf3960966ad
ProvenanceObservedSourceUploaded fileObserved at - 05
Observed process — "C:\Program Files\Java\jre-1.8\bin\javaw.exe" -jar "C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\runtime.jar"
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 06
Observed process — C:\Windows\system32\icacls.exe C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\.oracle_jre_usage /grant "everyone":(OI)(CI)M
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 07
File written: 5792 — C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_<USER>\5792
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 08
File written: 3903daac9bc4a3b7.timestamp — C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\.oracle_jre_usage\3903daac9bc4a3b7.timestamp
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 09
Contacted host: 162.159.36.2 — Contact observed during runtime.
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
Signatures and behavior heuristics
A community signature or high-severity behavioral heuristic matched. Signatures identify known patterns; heuristics are strong leads but are not proof on their own.
The saved runtime evidence maps this activity to MITRE T1055 (Process Injection). The mapping supports possible process injection, but it does not prove the exact injection method or the operator's intent.
Evidence"C:\Program Files\Java\jre-1.8\bin\javaw.exe" -jar "C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\runtime.jar"The sample contacted an external IP address directly and no application domain was recorded. Direct-IP traffic also occurs in legitimate installers and infrastructure, so this is supporting context only and requires corroboration from host reputation and other runtime evidence.
Evidence162.159.36.2
0 of 73 engines flagged this file
View all 73 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Moderate prevalence — neither rare nor common. No strong prior applies.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- goodmod-1.1.0.jar
- Format
- JAR
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 40.5 MB
- Last analyzed
- Oct 6, 2026, 3:36 AM UTC
7d0d5d7887245889aae14e858fd6ca8336cc4dc20559310f69a36cf3960966adSafety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
We couldn't fully clear this file. Treat it with caution.
- Recovery step 01
Don't open or run it unless you're certain it came from a source you trust.
- Recovery step 02
Check where you got it — an unexpected attachment or a random download link is a red flag.
- Recovery step 03
If its origin cannot be confirmed, delete this Java file and use a fresh copy from a trusted source. Get a fresh copy from the publisher's official site and verify its exact hash when possible.
- Recovery step 04
If you're still unsure, scan it again in a day or two — detections often catch up on newer files.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is goodmod-1.1.0.jar safe, or is it malware?
What is goodmod-1.1.0.jar?
How many antivirus engines detected goodmod-1.1.0.jar?
What should I do if I already opened or ran goodmod-1.1.0.jar?
How do I remove goodmod-1.1.0.jar?
What is the SHA-256 hash of goodmod-1.1.0.jar?
How up to date is this analysis of goodmod-1.1.0.jar?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.