Is SL Defeat SSE - SexLab P+ Patch 1.0.zip safe?
None of 77 antivirus engines detected the established ZIP archive, and independent threat-intelligence checks produced no known-malware or matching-rule hits.
All 77 antivirus engines were free of malicious or suspicious findings, including 18 high-trust engines. The archive has also been known for 674 days without threat-intelligence corroboration, although no runtime analysis or complete host-reputation check is available.
7e4d0d239019d88141…cfee41ca00284bRecommended next actions
Before opening or extracting
Open or extract it only when its sender or download source has been independently verified.
If you already opened or extracted it
Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
All 77 antivirus engines were free of malicious or suspicious findings, including 18 high-trust engines. The archive has also been known for 674 days without threat-intelligence corroboration, although no runtime analysis or complete host-reputation check is available.
Static scanning produced no malicious or suspicious findings from 77 engines, with all 18 reporting high-trust engines returning no detection. Independent checks found no MalwareBazaar record, CIRCL match, or YARAify rule match. The ZIP has been known for 674 days and has appeared across nine sources, reducing concern that it is an untested new upload. Code signing is not meaningful for a ZIP archive, so its unsigned status carries no negative weight. No runtime observation was completed, and no complete contacted-host reputation result is available, so extracted files should still be scanned before use.
What We Detected
None of 77 antivirus engines reported the ZIP as malicious or suspicious. All 18 reporting high-trust engines, including BitDefender, ESET-NOD32, Kaspersky, Fortinet, and Avast, returned no detection. MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, and YARAify also produced no matching threat record or rule.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox run is available because behaviour is null, so runtime activity was not observed. contactedHosts is also null, meaning no complete host-reputation result is available. The sample is a ZIP archive, and code-signing absence is neutral for this file type.
What To Do Now
Obtain the archive from the expected mod distribution channel and scan its extracted contents before installation. Keep endpoint protection enabled, and review scripts or executable files inside the archive before running them.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- behaviour=null, so the archive and any extracted contents were not observed executing.
- contactedHosts=null, meaning no complete contacted-host reputation result is available.
- similarHashes is empty, so no prior comparable-file decisions support the assessment.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/77 engines reported malicious or suspicious findings.
- 18 high-trust engines reported no detection.
- No MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, or YARAify match.
- The archive has been known for 674 days.
- No brand mismatch or adversarial-input flag was detected.
- No completed runtime observation is available.
- No complete contacted-host reputation result is available.
- The archive's extracted contents were not separately described in the evidence.
Use the archive only from its expected mod source and scan all extracted files before installation. Keep antivirus and endpoint protection enabled.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete0 of 77 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 0 / 77engines flagged
- 9sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
0 of 77 antivirus engines flagged the file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
No completed runtime observation is available for this file.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceRuntime coverageObserved at - 03
The hash has been submitted 10 times from 9 sources.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
0 of 77 engines flagged this file
View all 77 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Moderate prevalence — neither rare nor common. No strong prior applies.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- SL Defeat SSE - SexLab P+ Patch 1.0.zip
- Format
- ZIP
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 69.7 KB
- Last analyzed
- Oct 2, 2026, 5:49 AM UTC
7e4d0d239019d881419e28e6c18a76f914f1e235e8b27f3d50cfee41ca00284bSafety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.
- Recovery step 01
Open or extract it only when its sender or download source has been independently verified.
- Recovery step 02
A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.
- Recovery step 03
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is SL Defeat SSE - SexLab P+ Patch 1.0.zip safe?
What is SL Defeat SSE - SexLab P+ Patch 1.0.zip?
How many antivirus engines detected SL Defeat SSE - SexLab P+ Patch 1.0.zip?
What is the SHA-256 hash of SL Defeat SSE - SexLab P+ Patch 1.0.zip?
Is it safe to open or extract SL Defeat SSE - SexLab P+ Patch 1.0.zip?
How up to date is this analysis of SL Defeat SSE - SexLab P+ Patch 1.0.zip?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.