Threat LensFile scan report

Is paper-api-1.21.11-R0.1-20251209.225848-3.jar safe?

Verdict
Safe

No antivirus engine detected this JAR, and its sandbox run produced no malicious verdict, though three offensive-technique mappings merit routine caution.

The file received no detections from 74 antivirus engines, including all 17 tier-1 engines, and one completed sandbox did not issue a malicious verdict. Three offensive MITRE mappings were recorded, but they lack family, network, child-file, or external-intelligence corroboration and may reflect instrumentation or broad behavioral classification.

Open or run with normal care

Use the file only if its SHA-256 can be matched to the official Paper distribution or trusted build source. Keep endpoint protection enabled and isolate initial deployment when provenance is uncertain.

Read the full analysis
Saved file evidenceAntivirus consensus
0of 74 flagged
Flagged 0No detection 74
Digital specimenpaper-api-1.21.11-R0.1-20251209.225848-3.jar7ec623c368f72a6a73…dc77606a29809b
Size2.7 MB
Code signingNot applicable
SandboxRuntime complete
First seen9mo ago
Evidence3 priority signals
0 of 74 antivirus engines flagged the file.

Recommended next actions

01

Before opening or running

Open or run it only when its publisher and download source have been independently verified.

02

If you already opened or ran it

Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.

Chapter 02

Intelligence

The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.

MT AI Engine · Verdict analysis

The reasoning behind this verdict

This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.

82%Confidence
High
Analyst conclusion

The file received no detections from 74 antivirus engines, including all 17 tier-1 engines, and one completed sandbox did not issue a malicious verdict. Three offensive MITRE mappings were recorded, but they lack family, network, child-file, or external-intelligence corroboration and may reflect instrumentation or broad behavioral classification.

Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
  • The completed sandbox mapped activity to T1055, T1543.002, and T1562.001, which are offensive techniques and warrant caution despite the absence of an overall malicious sandbox verdict.
  • contactedHosts=null, so no complete host-reputation cross-check is available; however, the sandbox recorded no domains, IPs, or URLs.
  • All 7 inspected dropped children have unknown individual verdicts, so droppedChildren.hasMaliciousChild=false is not equivalent to seven confirmed-benign children.

These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.

Recommended action

Use the file only if its SHA-256 can be matched to the official Paper distribution or trusted build source. Keep endpoint protection enabled and isolate initial deployment when provenance is uncertain.

Scan transparency

Coverage & freshness

4 of 5 complete

Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.

  • Antivirus

    Complete

    0 of 74 engines flagged the file.

  • Sandbox

    Complete

    1 isolated runtime environment contributed observations.

  • Network

    Not run

    No contacted-host reputation check is recorded.

    No timestamp recorded
  • YARA

    Complete

    1 signature or behavior rule matched.

  • External intel

    Complete

    3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.

Chapter 03

Behavior

Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.

Runtime flight recorder

Capture complete
  • 1isolated sandbox run
  • 15MITRE ATT&CK techniques
  • 11spawned processes
  • 0network contacts
  • 13filesystem & mutex artifacts
Recorded behavior

Attack story

Runtime observations grouped by analysis stage. Arrows organize the stages; they do not claim chronology or causality.

ObservedDerived

5 recorded facts from one runtime window. Every fact remains independently traceable in Analyst mode.

Chapter 04

Detection & Forensics

Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.

Chapter 05

Safety & FAQ

Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.

What to do now

This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.

  1. Recovery step 01

    Open or run it only when its publisher and download source have been independently verified.

  2. Recovery step 02

    A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.

  3. Recovery step 03

    Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.

Safety FAQ

Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.

6 evidence-based answers
Is paper-api-1.21.11-R0.1-20251209.225848-3.jar safe?
Evidence-based answer
paper-api-1.21.11-R0.1-20251209.225848-3.jar appears safe. 0 of 74 antivirus engines flagged it. Open or run it only when its publisher and download source have been independently verified.
What is paper-api-1.21.11-R0.1-20251209.225848-3.jar?
Evidence-based answer
paper-api-1.21.11-R0.1-20251209.225848-3.jar is a Java application or archive, about 2.7 MB. Our analysis did not identify a verdict-driving threat signal. A file's name can be reused by different files, so we identify it by its cryptographic hash (below).
How many antivirus engines detected paper-api-1.21.11-R0.1-20251209.225848-3.jar?
Evidence-based answer
None — 0 of 74 antivirus engines flagged paper-api-1.21.11-R0.1-20251209.225848-3.jar. That's reassuring, though it is not proof that a file is safe, so we also weigh its behaviour, identity, and reputation.
What is the SHA-256 hash of paper-api-1.21.11-R0.1-20251209.225848-3.jar?
Evidence-based answer
The SHA-256 hash of paper-api-1.21.11-R0.1-20251209.225848-3.jar is 7ec623c368f72a6a7326a2d903397a537b0c4cad86d6f63f65dc77606a29809b, and its MD5 is 6e874f794ae61de533384eca8a4bb2dd. This hash is the file's unique fingerprint — two files with the same SHA-256 are identical. Use it to confirm you're looking at exactly this file (not just one with the same name) when comparing against antivirus databases or a download's published checksum.
Is it safe to open or run paper-api-1.21.11-R0.1-20251209.225848-3.jar?
Evidence-based answer
Based on the recorded evidence, paper-api-1.21.11-R0.1-20251209.225848-3.jar has a low observed risk. The important caveat is source: make sure you downloaded it from the official website or a trusted store, because attackers sometimes distribute malware-laced copies under a legitimate file's name. If your own antivirus flags it, verify the source and the exact hash before overriding the warning.
How up to date is this analysis of paper-api-1.21.11-R0.1-20251209.225848-3.jar?
Evidence-based answer
This report reflects the scan run on September 15, 2026. Because a file's hash never changes, the identity of paper-api-1.21.11-R0.1-20251209.225848-3.jar is fixed — but antivirus coverage improves over time, so a file that looks clean today can pick up detections later (and vice-versa). If you need the latest picture, MalwareTips staff can re-run the analysis from scratch.
Chapter 06

Community

Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.

The raw file is processed temporarily and is not retained after processing. Its hash and report are public and permanent, so the next person who checks the same file gets an instant answer. Unknown files may be submitted to VirusTotal for analysis. If you ran this file on your computer and are worried, scan your system with an up-to-date antivirus and change critical passwords from a different device.