Is DRAFT Financial Release_August 24, 2026.pdf safe?
Single tier-1 detection on a brand-new PDF with no sandbox or host data.
One tier-1 engine flagged the PDF as PDF/Pishing.QRC!tr while 16 other tier-1 engines stayed silent. The file is only two submissions old and has no runtime or external-intel corroboration.
80b1e9440d6a5a4ff9…00cc8e8287deadRecommended next actions
Before opening
Do not open it until the source can be verified independently.
If you already opened it
Stop using it, scan the device, and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts. Get a fresh copy from the original trusted source and verify its exact hash when possible.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
One tier-1 engine flagged the PDF as PDF/Pishing.QRC!tr while 16 other tier-1 engines stayed silent. The file is only two submissions old and has no runtime or external-intel corroboration.
A lone tier-1 detection on a PDF is not enough for a malicious verdict, yet the file's extreme rarity and future-dated filename keep it out of the safe category. No sandbox execution, no contacted-host reputation, and no similar-hash history exist to resolve the ambiguity. The combination of minimal distribution and a single high-trust flag produces mixed signals that warrant caution.
What We Detected
Fortinet is the only engine that flagged the sample, labeling it PDF/Pishing.QRC!tr. Sixteen other tier-1 engines returned clean. No sandbox, dropped children, or contacted-host data are available.
Threat Behavior
Static evidence alone shows a PDF submitted for the first time today with a filename referencing a future date. No YARA, CIRCL, or MalwareBazaar hits exist.
What To Do Now
Do not open the attachment. Request the document through verified channels and scan any replacement copy with current protection enabled.
Where this verdict could be wrong1 caveat
- Only one tier-1 engine flagged; 16 other tier-1 engines reported clean.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 16 tier-1 engines clean
- no sandbox malicious verdict
- rare_new prevalence
- future-dated filename
- single tier-1 detection
Treat the file as untrusted until independent confirmation or a replacement copy from a verified source is obtained.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete1 of 75 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 1 / 75engines flagged
- 2sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
1 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file, including Fortinet.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
The hash has been submitted 2 times from 2 sources.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
1 of 75 engines flagged this file
View all 75 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Barely seen in the wild and first surfaced recently. 1 antivirus detection make that low prevalence materially relevant, but rarity alone is not proof of malware.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- DRAFT Financial Release_August 24, 2026.pdf
- Format
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 33.1 KB
- Last analyzed
- Aug 25, 2026, 4:20 AM UTC
80b1e9440d6a5a4ff9bb246805b37e6acc4ad6617b13de80c700cc8e8287deadSafety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
We couldn't fully clear this file. Treat it with caution.
- Recovery step 01
Don't open it unless you're certain it came from a source you trust.
- Recovery step 02
Check where you got it — an unexpected attachment or a random download link is a red flag.
- Recovery step 03
If its origin cannot be confirmed, delete this file and use a fresh copy from a trusted source. Get a fresh copy from the original trusted source and verify its exact hash when possible.
- Recovery step 04
If you're still unsure, scan it again in a day or two — detections often catch up on newer files.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is DRAFT Financial Release_August 24, 2026.pdf safe, or is it malware?
What is DRAFT Financial Release_August 24, 2026.pdf?
How many antivirus engines detected DRAFT Financial Release_August 24, 2026.pdf?
What should I do if I already opened DRAFT Financial Release_August 24, 2026.pdf?
How do I remove DRAFT Financial Release_August 24, 2026.pdf?
What is the SHA-256 hash of DRAFT Financial Release_August 24, 2026.pdf?
How up to date is this analysis of DRAFT Financial Release_August 24, 2026.pdf?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.