MalwareTipsTools

File scan report

Scan another file

Verdict Suspicious

Analyzed , 36 minutes ago

Is Xeno-v1.3.65.exe safe? Treat it as suspicious.

Three malware-specific YARA matches, a failed signature, one detection from a major antivirus engine, and divided sandbox results outweigh the file's broad distribution and…

Read the whole reasonShow less

Why Suspicious? One antivirus engine (Dr.Web) flags it and a community rule for known malware matched it.

Moderate evidence · More than one sign points to a problem, but nothing confirms it is harmful.

Don't run it until you know where it came from

If it came from a link, an attachment or a stranger, delete it.

What to do now4 steps

Some signs point to a problem, but nothing confirms it is harmful. Treat it with caution.

What to do

  1. Don't run it unless you're sure where it came from.

  2. Check where you got it: an unexpected attachment, a link someone sent you or a re-upload is a red flag.

  3. If you can't confirm where it came from, delete it. If you need the program, download it again from the publisher's own website.

If you already ran it

  1. Stop using it, run a full scan with your antivirus and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts.

Not sure what to do?

Ask the MalwareTips community before you run it. If you already ran it, follow the cleanup guide.

Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.

Why we think so

Share this file report

Xeno-v1.3.65.exe: Suspicious — MalwareTips file scan

The link always shows the latest result for this exact file (its SHA-256 fingerprint).

Antivirus results

1 of 52 flagged

  • Flagged 1
  • No detection 51
  • No result 23
FileXeno-v1.3.65.exe88.9 MBSHA-256 829c1e8861ca…52c7a1
  • Code signing Signer not verified
  • Test run Completed
  • First seen 17d ago
A sandbox test run rated its behaviour as malicious.

Chapter 02

Why we think so

4 points against it and 5 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.

MT AI Engine · Verdict analysis

The reasoning behind this verdict

Analyst conclusion

This executable carries several independent warning signs: three malware-specific YARA matches, a failed certificate chain, and a DrWeb trojan detection. Sandbox conclusions were divided rather than conclusive, while broad distribution and benign file it created references provide counterweight, so it should not be run outside an isolated research environment.

Where this verdict could be wrong5 caveats
  • Only 1 of the 52 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable, and several major engines that reported a result did not detect it.
  • The file was submitted by 3,654 distinct sources, indicating broad distribution.
  • Seven inspected files it created matched known-software reference entries, and none of the inspected children was malicious or suspicious.
  • The sandbox evidence was divided: one combined label was malicious while another was clean.
  • The three prior safe files with the same import-table fingerprint had different or unverified publishers, so those matches provide only weak reassurance.

These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.

6 sources checked · all complete. See every source

Chapter 03

What it did in our test

It ran in 7 isolated tests; 1 test environment rated what it did as risky.

Test run summary

Capture complete
  • 7isolated sandbox runs
  • 41sandbox rule tags
  • 5spawned processes
  • 0network contacts
  • 40filesystem & mutex artifacts

What the test run showed

What the file did on a test computer

Confirmed in the test run

  • High concern: Encrypted files on the test computer, as ransomware does.

  • Moderate concern: Contains packed or scrambled code that is harder to inspect (common in installers too).

  • Moderate concern: Ran commands or a script on the test computer.

  • Moderate concern: Unpacked hidden content while it ran.

  • Moderate concern: Checked whether it was running on a test computer.

  • Note: Read the user name of the test computer.

  • Note: Listed the programs running on the test computer.

Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)

  • Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as password-store access, but nothing touched the Windows password store.

  • Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as code injection, but no injected program was recorded.

  • Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as contacting a server, but no contacted host was recorded.

  • Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as setting up auto-start; no auto-start entry was recorded.

This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.

Recorded behavior

What happened in the test

Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.

Seen in the test runWorked out from other results

  1. Input file

    The submitted object

    1
    1. Evidence 1 of 5: FileSeen in the test run

      Xeno-v1.3.65.exe

      829c1e8861cadb5835fe968b98d06254254e6a4120250d9f5cf612d3f152c7a1

      Uploaded file

  2. Processes

    What ran

    2
    1. Evidence 2 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run

      OpenWith.exe

      C:\Windows\system32\OpenWith.exe -Embedding

      Test run
    2. Evidence 3 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run

      Xeno-v1.3.65.exe

      "C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\3KyUqhCJZ5zlHiOQfYR15XZ3zaE\Xeno-v1.3.65.exe" --type=utility --utility-sub-type=network.mojom.NetworkService --lang=en-US --service-sandbox-type=none --user-data-dir="C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Roaming\Xeno" --mojo-platform-channel-handle=2580 --field-trial-handle=1816,i,4875788451381389941,2585783611525294392,262144 --disable-features=SpareRendererForSitePerProcess,WinRetrieveSuggestionsOnlyOnDemand /prefetch:8

      Test run
    3. +1 more recorded observation

  3. Files

    Created or changed

    2
    1. Evidence 4 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run

      thumbcache_idx.db

      C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Explorer\thumbcache_idx.db

      Test run
    2. Evidence 5 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run

      thumbcache_32.db

      C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Explorer\thumbcache_32.db

      Test run
    3. +1 more recorded observation

5 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.

Chapter 04

Technical details

1 of the 52 antivirus engines that checked it flags it; a signature that did not verify.

Sources checked

Every check behind this verdict

6 sources checked · all complete. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.

SourceStatusResultChecked
Antivirus enginesVirusTotal · 75 enginesCompleteRisk signal: 1 of 52 engines flagged it · 23 gave no result Details for antivirus engines
Sandbox runVirusTotal sandboxes · C2AE, CAPA, CAPE SandboxCompleteWorth noting: 7 runs: 1 malicious, 1 clean, 5 without a verdict Details for sandbox run
Contacted hostsMalwareTips URL scannerComplete1 contacted host checked
Signature rulesYARAify community rules + MalwareTips rulesCompleteRisk signal: 7 community YARA rules (3 malware-specific) · 2 MalwareTips behaviour rules Details for signature rules
Malware sample databaseabuse.ch MalwareBazaarCompleteNot listed
Known-software referenceCIRCL hashlookupCompleteNo match

Engines that flagged it 1

  • DrWeb (major engine)Trojan.Siggen36.47113

File fingerprint

Last analyzed
Nov 7, 2026, 5:31 PM UTC
SHA-256
829c1e8861cadb5835fe968b98d06254254e6a4120250d9f5cf612d3f152c7a1
SHA-1
1062875afbb81eba98b1f121d723cb86d194fc9c
MD5
a9f2c1d8645d1c9ef97fc01771815dd1

About this file

Xeno-v1.3.65.exe says it is New Electron UI for Xeno (Xeno-v1.3.65), 88.9 MB.

Claims to be
New Electron UI for Xeno (Xeno-v1.3.65)From the file's own version information, written by whoever built it.
Type and size
Win32 EXE · 88.9 MB
Signer
Rizve A (unverified signature)Worth noting: Malware sometimes copies or steals a company's signature, so this does not mean that company made it.
First seen
Oct 20, 2026On VirusTotal.
Submitted by
3,654 distinct sources
Packer
None detected
Entropy
2.25 of 8

First scanned

Chapter 05

Questions & answers

Short answers to the 7 questions people ask most about this file.

Is Xeno-v1.3.65.exe safe, or is it malware?
Xeno-v1.3.65.exe is rated Suspicious: some signs point to a problem, but nothing confirms it is harmful. 1 of the 52 antivirus engines that checked it flags it. Don't run it unless you're sure where it came from. If you need the program, download it again from the publisher's own website.
What is Xeno-v1.3.65.exe?
Xeno-v1.3.65.exe is a Windows program, about 88.9 MB. Its version information says it is “New Electron UI for Xeno” (Xeno-v1.3.65). Version information is written by whoever built the file, so it is a claim, not proof of who made it. VirusTotal first saw it on Oct 20, 2026.
How many antivirus engines detected Xeno-v1.3.65.exe?
1 of the 52 antivirus engines that checked it flags Xeno-v1.3.65.exe (Dr.Web). We weigh which engines flagged it and what else the scan found, not just the count.
What should I do if I already ran Xeno-v1.3.65.exe?
No infection is confirmed: the rating is a caution, not a malware finding. 1) Check where it came from. If you can't confirm the source, delete it. 2) Run a full scan with your security software. 3) If the scan finds something, follow its removal steps and change passwords you typed on the device since then.
Is Xeno-v1.3.65.exe digitally signed?
It carries a signature in the name of Rizve A that could not be verified. Malware sometimes copies or steals a company's signature, so this does not mean that company made it.
What is the SHA-256 hash of Xeno-v1.3.65.exe?
The SHA-256 fingerprint of Xeno-v1.3.65.exe is 829c1e8861cadb5835fe968b98d06254254e6a4120250d9f5cf612d3f152c7a1, and its MD5 is a9f2c1d8645d1c9ef97fc01771815dd1. Two files with the same SHA-256 are identical, so use it to check you have exactly this file, not just one with the same name.
How up to date is this analysis of Xeno-v1.3.65.exe?
This report reflects the scan on Nov 7, 2026. A file's fingerprint never changes, but antivirus engines keep learning, so a rating can change later. To get a newer result, scan the file again: we refresh the antivirus results when the saved ones are out of date.
Chapter 06

Community

Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.

Scanned by
VirusChecker

Related file reports

Recent reports on other files with the same rating.

All file reports
Scan another
Check a different file
URL instead?
Check if a link is safe
This report and its SHA-256 fingerprint are public, so the next person who checks the same file gets an instant answer; documents and images are listed by type instead of their file name. A file we had not seen before is uploaded to VirusTotal, whose security partners and subscribers can download it; MalwareTips deletes its own copy after the scan. If you ran this file and are worried, scan your device with up-to-date security software.