Is Downloaded from CracksHash.com.txt safe?
This 402-byte text file drew no detections from 75 engines and has no corroborated malicious behavior or threat-intelligence match.
No engine flagged this 402-byte text file, including the high-trust scanners, and one completed sandbox run produced no malicious verdict. Its long, widespread submission history and lack of external intelligence matches further support a benign text artifact, although the crack-themed filename warrants ordinary source caution.
85365f8542ef3903f6…a28254d6da215eRecommended next actions
Before opening
Open it only when its sender or download source is one you independently trust.
If you already opened it
Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
No engine flagged this 402-byte text file, including the high-trust scanners, and one completed sandbox run produced no malicious verdict. Its long, widespread submission history and lack of external intelligence matches further support a benign text artifact, although the crack-themed filename warrants ordinary source caution.
All 75 antivirus engines returned without a malicious or suspicious detection, with 16 high-trust engines specifically reporting no detection. The submitted object is only a 402-byte text file, so executable code signing is not applicable. One completed sandbox run recorded no offensive techniques, malicious verdict, persistence, written files, or dropped payloads. The two observed domains were covered by the host cross-check and had no known malicious or suspicious result, although separate coverage of the four IP addresses is not documented. The file has circulated since 2020 across 1,198 sources and 1,358 submissions without accumulating detections, while researcher intelligence services supplied no matching threat evidence. The filename and isolated community annotation are weaker contextual concerns and are not supported by the technical findings.
What We Detected
The sample is a 402-byte text file. None of 75 antivirus engines flagged it, and 16 high-trust engines reported no detection. Research intelligence checks also returned no MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, or YARAify match.
Threat Behavior
One completed sandbox run recorded no offensive techniques, malicious sandbox verdict, persistence changes, written files, or dropped payloads. The two observed domains were inspected and had no known malicious or suspicious classification. The record does not establish separate reputation coverage for all four observed IP addresses. Script-host process entries appear in the sandbox telemetry, but they reference differently named JavaScript files and did not lead to corroborated harmful activity.
What To Do Now
The evidence supports treating this object as a benign text artifact. Because its filename references an untrusted crack-distribution source, avoid visiting embedded links or obtaining software from that source, and keep endpoint protection enabled when examining related downloads.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- The filename references a crack-distribution domain, and communityComments include an unsupported malware annotation; neither is corroborated by the 0/75 engine result.
- Sandbox process records include wscript.exe running download.js and sample.js, but those names do not match the submitted 402-byte text filename and no malicious sandbox verdict, written files, persistence, or offensive techniques followed.
- contactedHosts.inspected=2 covers the two observed domains, but the payload does not document separate reputation inspection for all four contacted IP addresses.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/75 antivirus engines reported a malicious or suspicious result.
- 16 tier-1 engines reported no detection.
- The object is a 402-byte text file rather than an executable.
- One sandbox run produced no malicious verdict, offensive technique, persistence, written file, or dropped payload.
- The hash has 1,358 submissions from 1,198 sources dating back to 2020.
- Filename references a crack-distribution source.
- One community annotation labels the sample as malware without supporting technical evidence.
- Sandbox telemetry includes script-host commands for differently named JavaScript files.
- Host-reputation coverage for all four contacted IP addresses is not documented.
No remediation is indicated for this text file itself. Avoid links and software associated with crack-distribution sources, and keep endpoint protection enabled.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete0 of 75 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
Complete1 isolated runtime environment contributed observations.
Network
Partial2 of 6 contacted hosts were cross-checked; coverage is incomplete.
YARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime flight recorder
Capture complete- 1isolated sandbox run
- 4MITRE ATT&CK techniques
- 4spawned processes
- 6network contacts
- 1filesystem & mutex artifacts
What this file did when executed
This file was detonated in 1 sandbox and its runtime behaviour was observed.
Adversary techniques mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
- gateway.fe.apple-dns.net
- tse1.mm.bing.net
- 204.79.197.203
- 17.57.144.84
- 17.248.185.206
- 17.253.21.201
- NULL
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 0 / 75engines flagged
- 1,198sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
The hash has a long, established submission history across 1,198 sources.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceDerivedSourceSubmission historyObserved at - 03
The hash has been submitted 1,358 times from 1,198 sources.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at - 04
Scanned file: Downloaded from CracksHash.com.txt — 85365f8542ef3903f6981c365f9e6529335438b2e3d444795aa28254d6da215e
ProvenanceObservedSourceUploaded fileObserved at - 05
Observed process — "C:\Windows\system32\wscript.exe" "C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\download.js"
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 06
Observed process — /usr/libexec/xpcproxy
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 07
Contacted host: gateway.fe.apple-dns.net — Contact observed during runtime.
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 08
Contacted host: tse1.mm.bing.net — Contact observed during runtime.
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
0 of 75 engines flagged this file
View all 75 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Widely seen in the wild for a long time. High prior this is legitimate; isolated detections on common-old files are usually false positives.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- Downloaded from CracksHash.com.txt
- Format
- Text
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 402 B
- Last analyzed
- Oct 2, 2026, 10:48 PM UTC
85365f8542ef3903f6981c365f9e6529335438b2e3d444795aa28254d6da215eSafety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.
- Recovery step 01
Open it only when its sender or download source is one you independently trust.
- Recovery step 02
A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.
- Recovery step 03
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is Downloaded from CracksHash.com.txt safe?
What is Downloaded from CracksHash.com.txt?
How many antivirus engines detected Downloaded from CracksHash.com.txt?
What is the SHA-256 hash of Downloaded from CracksHash.com.txt?
Is it safe to open Downloaded from CracksHash.com.txt?
How up to date is this analysis of Downloaded from CracksHash.com.txt?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.