Is the-house-of-the-dead-pc_archive.torrent safe?
No antivirus engine detected a threat, although the newly observed sample lacks runtime analysis and its torrent-style filename conflicts with its JavaScript classification.
All 75 antivirus engines returned no malicious or suspicious detection, including 17 tier-1 engines, and external intelligence produced no matching threat indicators. Confidence is moderated because the sample is newly observed, has no completed sandbox analysis, and is classified as JavaScript despite its .torrent-style filename.
867d857ba0fb5da93f…83d3f7d90ef810Recommended next actions
Before running
Run it only when it came from the developer's official site or another source you independently trust.
If you already ran it
Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
All 75 antivirus engines returned no malicious or suspicious detection, including 17 tier-1 engines, and external intelligence produced no matching threat indicators. Confidence is moderated because the sample is newly observed, has no completed sandbox analysis, and is classified as JavaScript despite its .torrent-style filename.
The strongest evidence is broad detection agreement: 0 of 75 engines flagged the file, and all 17 reporting tier-1 engines found no threat. Research intelligence also returned no MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, or YARAify match. Signing is not meaningful for this file type, so its absence carries no negative weight. However, the sample has only one submission and no completed runtime observation, while contacted-host reputation was not checked or saved. The filename and detected JavaScript type also conflict, so it should be handled cautiously despite the favorable static scan.
What We Detected
None of the 75 antivirus engines marked this sample as malicious or suspicious. The detection-free group includes Avast, BitDefender, ESET-NOD32, Kaspersky, and Microsoft, while externalIntel.malwareBazaar.hit=false, externalIntel.circl.hit=false, and externalIntel.yaraify.ruleCount=0 provide no independent malware-family corroboration.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox observation is available because behaviour=null, so execution behavior cannot be characterized. contactedHosts=null also means there is no complete host-reputation result. One caution is the mismatch between the torrent-style filename and file.fileType=JavaScript, which could reflect misidentification or misleading packaging.
What To Do Now
Keep endpoint protection enabled and open the file only with software appropriate for its verified format. If it unexpectedly launches a script, requests elevated privileges, or came from an untrusted source, do not run it and obtain a fresh scan or sandbox report.
Where this verdict could be wrong4 caveats
- prevalence.classification=rare_new and file.ageDays=0 mean reputation has not had time to develop.
- behaviour=null, so the file was not observed executing in a completed sandbox run.
- contactedHosts=null, so no complete host-reputation cross-check is available.
- The .torrent filename conflicts with file.fileType=JavaScript, warranting care before opening it.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/75 antivirus engines reported a malicious or suspicious result
- 17 tier-1 engines reported no detection
- No MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, or YARAify match
- No malicious dropped child was reported
- 5/5 broad file-type similarities had prior safe verdicts
- Newly observed sample with only one recorded submission
- No completed runtime sandbox observation
- No complete contacted-host reputation cross-check
- Torrent-style filename conflicts with the JavaScript file-type classification
Keep security software enabled and verify that the file is a genuine torrent metadata file before opening it. Avoid executing it as JavaScript, especially if its source is untrusted.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete0 of 75 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 0 / 75engines flagged
- 1sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
No completed runtime observation is available for this file.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceRuntime coverageObserved at - 03
The hash has been submitted 1 time from 1 source.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
0 of 75 engines flagged this file
View all 75 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Barely seen in the wild and first surfaced recently. That limits reputation evidence, but rarity alone is not proof of malware.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- the-house-of-the-dead-pc_archive.torrent
- Format
- JavaScript
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 25.3 KB
- Last analyzed
- Oct 2, 2026, 6:38 PM UTC
867d857ba0fb5da93f50a4c4f0ab05ab60e11ce99086ebb43e83d3f7d90ef810Safety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.
- Recovery step 01
Run it only when it came from the developer's official site or another source you independently trust.
- Recovery step 02
A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.
- Recovery step 03
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is the-house-of-the-dead-pc_archive.torrent safe?
What is the-house-of-the-dead-pc_archive.torrent?
How many antivirus engines detected the-house-of-the-dead-pc_archive.torrent?
What is the SHA-256 hash of the-house-of-the-dead-pc_archive.torrent?
Is it safe to run the-house-of-the-dead-pc_archive.torrent?
How up to date is this analysis of the-house-of-the-dead-pc_archive.torrent?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.