File scan report
Verdict Suspicious
Is [tcheats. com]asdf Hook HL_ March_ 27. rar safe? Treat it as suspicious.
Single major antivirus engine flags a 2012 RAR containing a password-protected game cheat executable.
Why Suspicious? One antivirus engine (Fortinet) flags it; nothing else confirms it.
Limited evidence
Treat the archive as untrusted; avoid running the extracted executable and monitor any systems that have already done so.
What to do now4 steps
Some signs point to a problem, but nothing confirms it is harmful. Treat it with caution.
What to do
Don't open or extract it unless you're sure where it came from.
Check where you got it: an unexpected attachment, a link someone sent you or a re-upload is a red flag.
If you can't confirm where it came from, delete it. If you need the program, download it again from the publisher's own website.
If you already opened or extracted it
Stop using it, run a full scan with your antivirus and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts.
Not sure what to do?
Ask the MalwareTips community before you run it. If you already ran it, follow the cleanup guide.
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
1 of 47 flagged
- Flagged 1
- No detection 46
- No result 28
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Completed
- First seen 14y ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
4 points against it and 4 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
One of the 47 antivirus engines that checked it (Fortinet) labels the archive W32/Zbot.FG. Sandbox extraction shows asdfHookHL.exe and cheat-related shortcuts; no malicious child verdict or external-intel hits. Mixed signals keep the file in suspicious territory.
The archive is old and widely submitted, yet carries a one detection from a major antivirus engine and sandbox behaviour consistent with game-cheat tooling. Offensive technique and password-protected extraction raise concern, but the absence of major consensus, malicious files it created, and external corroboration prevents a malicious verdict. The combination of signals lands between safe and malicious.
What We Detected
75 engines scanned the RAR; only Fortinet returned a malicious result (W32/Zbot.FG). Sandbox execution extracted asdfHookHL.exe plus cheat-related .url files using password 'infected'. One offensive MITRE technique (T1562.001) was logged.
Threat Behavior
The extracted executable and shortcuts suggest game-hack distribution. No malicious files it created or sandbox verdict were recorded, and no external intelligence sources flagged the sample.
What To Do Now
Do not execute the extracted files. Keep security software enabled. If the archive is not required, delete it; otherwise submit the inner executable for deeper analysis.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- One detection from a major antivirus engine without family consensus could be a rule-based false positive on a long-lived game-cheat archive.
- No sandbox malicious verdict and no malicious files it created observed despite extraction of asdfHookHL.exe.
- No external-intel hits (CIRCL, MalwareBazaar, YARAify) despite 5109-day history.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- No major family consensus
- No malicious files it created
- No external-intel corroboration
- Long history with no recent malicious activity
- One malicious detection from a major antivirus engine
- Password-protected extraction of executable
- Offensive technique observed
- Cheat/hack filename references
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 7sandbox rule tags
- 2spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 9filesystem & mutex artifacts
What the test run showed
What the file did on a test computer
Confirmed in the test run
Moderate concern: Checked whether it was running on a test computer.
Note: Read basic details of the test computer, such as its Windows version.
Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as recording keystrokes; no keylogging was confirmed.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as contacting a server, but no contacted host was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as weakening security settings; no setting change was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as changing how Windows loads code; nothing confirms it.
This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.
Recorded behavior
What happened in the test
Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.
- 1
Input file
The submitted object
- Evidence 1 of 5: FileSeen in the test run
[tcheats.com]asdfHookHL_March_27.rar
871d2e5f63716d6a451e3a0e782fa4e57c8bcf270a80dca41efb6ef087110d5f
Uploaded file
- 2
Processes
What ran
- Evidence 2 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
unarchiver.exe
"C:\Windows\SysWOW64\unarchiver.exe" "C:\Users\user\Desktop\[tobys.dk]asdfHookHL_March_27_2.rar"
Test run - Evidence 3 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
7za.exe
C:\Windows\SysWOW64\7za.exe "C:\Windows\System32\7za.exe" x -pinfected -y -o"C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\j2jgnq5h.uha" "C:\Users\user\Desktop\[tobys.dk]asdfHookHL_March_27_2.rar"
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Files
Created or changed
- Evidence 4 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
j2jgnq5h.uha
C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\j2jgnq5h.uha
Test run - Evidence 5 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
asdfHookHL March 27
C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\j2jgnq5h.uha\asdfHookHL March 27
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
5 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.
Includes 7 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 1 dropped file.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
1 of the 47 antivirus engines that checked it flags it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 1
- Fortinet (major engine)W32/Zbot.FG
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Jul 25, 2026, 11:34 AM UTC
- SHA-256
871d2e5f63716d6a451e3a0e782fa4e57c8bcf270a80dca41efb6ef087110d5f- SHA-1
f1bb745e4b6a4a0f1b062a53c8b9e0b3a7ce07b6- MD5
35568388e0dae2afb41a3278466a86aa
About this file
[tcheats.com]asdfHookHL_March_27.rar is an RAR file of 270.4 kB.
- Type and size
- RAR · 270.4 kB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Jul 28, 2012On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 258 distinct sources
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75) and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is [tcheats.com]asdfHookHL_March_27.rar safe, or is it malware?
What is [tcheats.com]asdfHookHL_March_27.rar?
How many antivirus engines detected [tcheats.com]asdfHookHL_March_27.rar?
What should I do if I already opened or extracted [tcheats.com]asdfHookHL_March_27.rar?
What is the SHA-256 hash of [tcheats.com]asdfHookHL_March_27.rar?
How up to date is this analysis of [tcheats.com]asdfHookHL_March_27.rar?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.