File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is DLTB Save Editor.
Only APEX flagged this unsigned executable, while no higher-confidence engine detected it; the isolated generic alert is most consistent with a false positive.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Run it only if it came from the developer's own website or an official app store.
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Antivirus results
1 of 71 flagged
- Flagged 1
- No detection 70
- No result 4
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Partial
- First seen 5d ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
3 points against it and 4 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
Only 1 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file, and that was APEX with a generic label; no higher-confidence engine detected it. This pattern usually indicates a false positive, although the absence of a verified signature, completed observation from the test run, and byte-level static inspection warrants obtaining it from a trusted source.
The antivirus results are dominated by non-detections: only APEX flagged the file, using a generic label, while no higher-confidence engine found a threat. No engine identifies a malware family, and public malware databases and malware-specific community rules produced no hit. The executable is not packed according to the antivirus analysis, and there is no high-entropy code indication. However, it is unsigned, has only seven distinct submitters, and was first seen on Oct 21, 2026. No completed observation from the test run or byte-level static inspection is available, so confidence remains moderate despite the strong false-positive pattern.
What We Detected
Only 1 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file. APEX supplied the sole alert and used the generic label “Malicious”; no higher-confidence engine detected it, and no malware family was identified.
Threat Behavior
No completed observation from the test run is available, so the file's behavior was not observed. Our static analysis was also unavailable because the bytes were not uploaded. The antivirus analysis reported no packer, no unusually high-entropy code, no external malware-database match, and no malware-specific community-rule match.
What To Do Now
Obtain the file from the developer's expected distribution channel and keep security software enabled. If its source is uncertain or it behaves unexpectedly, do not load it into an application until it has been examined with completed runtime and static analysis.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- The executable is unsigned and was submitted by only seven distinct sources, so the isolated detection cannot be dismissed with the same confidence as one affecting established signed software.
- No completed observation from the test run or byte-level static inspection is available, leaving the file's actual functionality unverified.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- Only 1 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file, and the alert was a generic APEX detection.
- No higher-confidence engine detected the file.
- No malware family, public malware-database entry, or malware-specific community-rule match was found.
- The antivirus analysis found no packer or unusually high-entropy code.
- The executable has no verified digital signature.
- It has been submitted by only seven distinct sources and was first seen on Oct 21, 2026.
- No completed observation from the test run or byte-level static inspection is available.
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 partial · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
Technical details
1 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flags it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 partial · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 1
The saved verdict treats these detections as likely false positives.
- APEXMalicious
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 25, 2026, 3:48 PM UTC
- SHA-256
8a01a8498a10ae682e8fead24770cd668b490aebdd0ba36090e87959b57d010f- SHA-1
8873753a8010b3d0eccd735eff74125810289ef8- MD5
d5fcf76fd50a00b8821ad2b0494ff9c0
About this file
DLTB Save Editor.dll is a Win32 EXE file of 3.3 MB.
- Claims to be
- DLTB Save EditorFrom the file's own version information, written by whoever built it.
- Original name
- DLTB Save Editor.dllMatches the shared file name.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 3.3 MB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Oct 21, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 7 distinct sourcesRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 5.70 of 8
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75), PE section entropy and packers and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is DLTB Save Editor.dll safe?
What is DLTB Save Editor.dll?
How many antivirus engines detected DLTB Save Editor.dll?
What is the SHA-256 hash of DLTB Save Editor.dll?
Is it safe to run DLTB Save Editor.dll?
How up to date is this analysis of DLTB Save Editor.dll?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.