File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is lib
None of the 62 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this ELF shared library, and available external intelligence found no family-specific or known-sample match.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
Accept the scan result when the library came from a trusted, expected source. For an unknown download, keep protection enabled and validate the source or test it in isolation before loading it.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Open it only if you trust the person or website it came from.
Keep your security software and system updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Antivirus results
0 of 62 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 62
- No result 13
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Not run
- First seen 10d ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
3 points against it and 3 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
None of the 62 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the library, including the reporting major antivirus engines, and available external intelligence produced no corroborating malware hit. Its limited history and lack of the test run warrant ordinary caution, especially if it came from an untrusted source.
The strongest evidence is the absence of detections across 75 engines, with 15 major antivirus engines reporting no detection. MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, and YARAify also produced no matching intelligence, and no malware-specific YARA rules matched. No sandbox execution completed, so behavior in the test run cannot be characterized, and no complete contacted-host reputation result is available. The file was first observed on Oct 16, 2026 from a single submitter, which limits reputation-based confidence. Four of five prior file-type comparisons received benign assessments, although those broad matches carry little identity value.
What We Detected
None of the 62 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this 64-bit ELF shared library. Available external intelligence also returned no MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, or YARAify match.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox observation is available, so the library's runtime actions were not observed. The contacted-host reputation check was not completed or saved, meaning no conclusion can be drawn about network destinations. No malicious file it created or family-specific static rule is present in the supplied evidence.
What To Do Now
The scan evidence does not identify malware, but the sample is and has almost no prevalence history. Use it only if its source and expected application are trusted; otherwise, retain security software and test it in an isolated environment before deployment.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- The file is and has only one submission, so its reputation is not established.
- No completed sandbox run is available, and the contacted-host reputation cross-check was not completed or saved.
- The prior similar-file decisions are based only on broad file-type matches and do not establish identity or shared code.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 62 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file.
- Available malware-sample and researcher-rule intelligence returned no matches.
- No filename disguise, brand conflict, or suspicious rule was identified.
- The file was first observed on Oct 16, 2026 and has only one known submission.
- No completed sandbox run is available to show what the library does when loaded.
- No complete reputation check is available for any hosts the file might contact.
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
Technical details
None of the 62 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 16, 2026, 3:58 AM UTC
- SHA-256
8a355e9dee0870b54c0b099bd4167f9ab1a3bc067831545d8fb540edf3578c56- SHA-1
70588d8e2f66cedbaa81080b8551bd70f040e754- MD5
3f6b508e50d3d76cfa9bd8d3e6ea7e1d
About this file
libVape421Native.so is an ELF file of 24.5 MB.
- Type and size
- ELF · 24.5 MB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Oct 16, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 1 sourceRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75) and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is libVape421Native.so safe?
What is libVape421Native.so?
How many antivirus engines detected libVape421Native.so?
What is the SHA-256 hash of libVape421Native.so?
Is it safe to open libVape421Native.so?
How up to date is this analysis of libVape421Native.so?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.