Is Sin confirmar 658653.crdownload safe?
Only MaxSecure raised a generic heuristic alert among 73 engines, while all 17 reporting tier-1 engines found no detection.
The only alert is MaxSecure's generic Trojan heuristic, with no support from the other 72 engines or any tier-1 detector. Independent intelligence also produced no matches, making the isolated alert highly likely to be a false positive, though no runtime analysis was completed.
8de5e702e5ac597573…8fe6bd1f4db11aRecommended next actions
Before opening or extracting
Open or extract it only when its sender or download source has been independently verified.
If you already opened or extracted it
Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
The only alert is MaxSecure's generic Trojan heuristic, with no support from the other 72 engines or any tier-1 detector. Independent intelligence also produced no matches, making the isolated alert highly likely to be a false positive, though no runtime analysis was completed.
One of 73 antivirus engines flagged the archive, and that result came from MaxSecure, a low-trust detector using a generic label. All 17 reporting tier-1 engines, including Kaspersky, BitDefender, ESET-NOD32, and Fortinet, returned no detection. No engine family consensus, confirmed hacktool label, malicious child, or external-intelligence match supports the alert. The sample has also been known since 2020 and was submitted by eight distinct sources, reducing concern that it is a newly emerging file. Runtime behavior and contacted-host reputation remain unassessed, so this conclusion rests primarily on the strong static detection pattern.
What We Detected
Only 1 of 73 antivirus engines raised an alert. MaxSecure labeled the archive “Trojan.Malware.300983.susgen,” but this is a generic heuristic result from a low-trust detector. All 17 reporting tier-1 engines returned no detection, and there is no agreed malware family.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox observation is available, so execution behavior was not observed. The contacted-host reputation check was also not completed or saved. The archive is tagged as containing a PE file and UPX content, but those static traits alone do not prove harmful behavior.
What To Do Now
The isolated detection is most consistent with a false positive. Keep endpoint protection enabled, verify that the incomplete download came from the intended source, and rescan the finished file before opening or extracting it.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- MaxSecure flagged the archive as 'Trojan.Malware.300983.susgen', although no other engine corroborated that generic detection.
- The file carries the tags 'contains-pe' and 'upx', which can complicate static inspection but do not independently establish harmful content.
- behaviour=null and contactedHosts=null leave runtime activity and contacted-host reputation unverified.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- Only 1/73 engines reported a detection.
- engines.tier1Malicious=0; all 17 reporting tier-1 engines were clean.
- engines.onlyLowTrustFlagging=true.
- No MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, or YARAify match was found.
- The sample has been observed since 2020 across eight sources.
- MaxSecure produced one generic Trojan heuristic detection.
- The ZIP archive is tagged 'contains-pe' and 'upx'.
- No completed runtime observation is available.
- No complete contacted-host reputation result is available.
Keep security protection enabled and rescan the completed download before use. If its source is unexpected or cannot be verified, delete it rather than opening or extracting it.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete1 of 73 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 1 / 73engines flagged
- 8sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
No completed runtime observation is available for this file.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceRuntime coverageObserved at - 02
1 of 73 antivirus engines flagged the file, including MaxSecure.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 03
The hash has been submitted 9 times from 8 sources.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
1 of 73 engines flagged this file
View all 73 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Moderate prevalence — neither rare nor common. No strong prior applies.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- Sin confirmar 658653.crdownload
- Format
- ZIP
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 3.1 MB
- Last analyzed
- Sep 22, 2026, 4:16 AM UTC
8de5e702e5ac59757385c3cb40a1246af1ab26907dac8d20b38fe6bd1f4db11aSafety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.
- Recovery step 01
Open or extract it only when its sender or download source has been independently verified.
- Recovery step 02
A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.
- Recovery step 03
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is Sin confirmar 658653.crdownload safe?
What is Sin confirmar 658653.crdownload?
How many antivirus engines detected Sin confirmar 658653.crdownload?
What is the SHA-256 hash of Sin confirmar 658653.crdownload?
Is it safe to open or extract Sin confirmar 658653.crdownload?
How up to date is this analysis of Sin confirmar 658653.crdownload?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.