Is winkey.exe safe?
A sandbox raised a malware alert after possible process-injection and LSASS-related activity, despite zero detections across 75 antivirus engines and a verified signature.
Runtime evidence raises substantial concern: one sandbox issued a malware alert and mapped possible process injection plus defense impairment, with LSASS-related activity also recorded. However, all 75 engines were silent, the signature verifies, and the sample is broadly submitted, so a sandbox false positive remains plausible.
8e5028fdeaebece7aa…18c8175ed3f29aRecommended next actions
Before running
Do not run it. Delete this file from the device, then empty the Recycle Bin or Trash.
If you already ran it
Disconnect from the internet, start a full or offline antivirus scan, then secure important accounts from a clean device.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
Runtime evidence raises substantial concern: one sandbox issued a malware alert and mapped possible process injection plus defense impairment, with LSASS-related activity also recorded. However, all 75 engines were silent, the signature verifies, and the sample is broadly submitted, so a sandbox false positive remains plausible.
One completed sandbox produced a malware alert and associated the execution with T1055 process injection and T1562.001 defense impairment. A synthesis heuristic also identified LSASS-related process activity resembling credential-access behavior, although the saved evidence does not prove that LSASS memory was read. In contrast, 0 of 75 engines detected the sample, including all 17 tier-1 engines, and no malware family consensus exists. The signature for Peter Panisz is valid, but there is no trusted-publisher match or historical signer record to establish a benign baseline. The sample is broadly submitted and external intelligence returned no hits, leaving a credible possibility that the runtime alert was caused by ambiguous sandbox telemetry.
What We Detected
None of the 75 antivirus engines flagged the file, including 17 tier-1 engines. The executable carries a verified signature from Peter Panisz, but that signer has no recorded sample history and is not matched to the curated trusted-publisher list. The file has also appeared across 160 sources and 177 submissions.
Threat Behavior
One completed sandbox issued a malware alert and mapped activity to T1055 for possible process injection and T1562.001 for possible defense impairment. A separate heuristic highlighted interaction involving lsass.exe as resembling credential-access tooling. These are important runtime indicators, but the retained evidence does not prove a specific injection method or establish that LSASS memory was actually read. Four contacted domains were checked without reputation hits, although the full set of observed domains, IPs, and URLs was not comprehensively covered.
What To Do Now
Do not run the file on a production system until its source and intended purpose are verified. Keep endpoint protection enabled, quarantine the sample, and obtain a fresh behavioral analysis or publisher confirmation before allowing execution.
Where this verdict could be wrong4 caveats
- All 75 engines produced no malicious detection, including 17 tier-1 engines, which strongly conflicts with the runtime alert.
- The file is verified as signed by 'Peter Panisz' and has been submitted 177 times by 160 sources, reducing the likelihood of a narrowly distributed new threat.
- contactedHosts inspected four domain hosts without a malicious or suspicious cache hit; however, the IP and URL contacts were not all covered.
- externalIntel.yaraify.ruleCount=0 and both externalIntel.malwareBazaar.hit=false and externalIntel.circl.hit=false, though absence of such hits does not prove benignity.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/75 engines reported a malicious result
- All 17 tier-1 engines reported no detection
- signing.verified=true for 'Peter Panisz'
- 160 unique sources and 177 submissions indicate broad prevalence
- externalIntel.yaraify.ruleCount=0 and externalIntel.malwareBazaar.hit=false
- behaviour.hasMaliciousSandboxVerdict=true in one completed sandbox
- T1055 possible process-injection activity
- T1562.001 possible defense-impairment activity
- LSASS-related activity surfaced by MalwareTips.Synth.CredentialDumper
- No established history for signer 'Peter Panisz'
- peAnalysis.likelyPacked=true for a .NET executable
Quarantine the executable and verify it directly with its publisher or distributor before use. Keep endpoint protection enabled and seek a second controlled runtime analysis to resolve the conflict between the sandbox alert and 0/75 engine detections.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete0 of 75 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
Complete1 isolated runtime environment contributed observations.
Network
Partial4 of 6 contacted hosts were cross-checked; coverage is incomplete.
YARA
Complete2 signature or behavior rules matched.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime flight recorder
Capture complete- 1isolated sandbox run
- 13MITRE ATT&CK techniques
- 8spawned processes
- 10network contacts
- 6filesystem & mutex artifacts
What this file does
Observed actions and their security significance
High concern: Injected code into another process, a technique that can conceal execution.
High concern: Attempted to impair or bypass security controls.
Moderate concern: Communicated over a common application protocol; malware can use this for command-and-control.
Moderate concern: Scans through your files and folders.
Moderate concern: Checked the environment for virtualisation or analysis tools.
Moderate concern: Checks which security software you have installed.
Note: Listed running processes; both legitimate software and malware may do this.
These are observed capabilities from an isolated analysis. A technique does not prove malicious intent on its own, and the file never ran on your device.
Attack story
Runtime observations grouped by analysis stage. Arrows organize the stages; they do not claim chronology or causality.
Input file
The submitted object
- FileObserved
winkey.exe
8e5028fdeaebece7aa5a376397fe6d498b30829e9ab1da28c318c8175ed3f29a
01Uploaded file
Processes
Runtime execution
- ProcessObserved
Observed process
"C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\winkey.exe"
02Isolated runtime analysis - ProcessObserved
Observed process
C:\Windows\system32\services.exe
03Isolated runtime analysis - +1 more recorded observation in Analyst mode
Files
Created or changed
- Written fileObserved
Download-1.tmp
C:\Windows\ServiceProfiles\LocalService\AppData\Local\FontCache\Fonts\Download-1.tmp
04Isolated runtime analysis - Written fileObserved
Cab29DB.tmp
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\Cab29DB.tmp
05Isolated runtime analysis - +1 more recorded observation in Analyst mode
Network
Hosts contacted
- Contacted hostObserved
subca.ocsp-certum.com
Contact observed during runtime.
06Isolated runtime analysis - Contacted hostObserved
ccsca2021.ocsp-certum.com
Contact observed during runtime.
07Isolated runtime analysis - +1 more recorded observation in Analyst mode
7 recorded facts from one runtime window. Every fact remains independently traceable in Analyst mode.
What this file did when executed
This file was detonated in 1 sandbox; 1 returned "malicious".
Adversary techniques mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
- subca.ocsp-certum.com
- ccsca2021.ocsp-certum.com
- repository.certum.pl
- bg.microsoft.map.fastly.net
- 23.215.11.239
- 8.8.8.8
- http://subca.ocsp-certum.com/MFEwTzBNMEswSTAJBgUrDgMCGgUABBTYOkzrrCGQj08njZXbUQQpkoUmuQQUCHbNywf%2FJPbFze27kLzihDdGdfcCEBu1jyUq3yMASSjJrj1%2B7Sc%3D
- http://subca.ocsp-certum.com/MFIwUDBOMEwwSjAJBgUrDgMCGgUABBRIH1V64SBkA%2BzJQVQ6VFBAcvLB3wQUtqFUOQLDoD%2BOirz61PgcptE6Dv0CEQCZo4AKJlU7ZavcboSms%2Bo5
- http://ccsca2021.ocsp-certum.com/MFEwTzBNMEswSTAJBgUrDgMCGgUABBRxypYNH69rICCzQBIRXN0YAFa3AAQU3XRdTADbe5%2BgdMqxbvc8wDLAcM0CEEMTg3mqk4p4k%2BFOjb4LvbI%3D
- http://repository.certum.pl/ctnca.cer
- C:\Windows\ServiceProfiles\LocalService\AppData\Local\FontCache\Fonts\Download-1.tmp
- C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\Cab29DB.tmp
- C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\Tar29DC.tmp
- C:\Users\user\AppData\Roaming
- C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\Cab29DB.tmp
- C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\Tar29DC.tmp
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 2rule hits recorded
- 0 / 75engines flagged
- 160sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
1 isolated runtime environment classified the observed behavior as malicious.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 02
1 high-confidence signature or behavior rule matched this file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceDerivedSourceSignature and behavior rulesObserved at - 03
0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file.
ProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 04
Scanned file: winkey.exe — 8e5028fdeaebece7aa5a376397fe6d498b30829e9ab1da28c318c8175ed3f29a
ProvenanceObservedSourceUploaded fileObserved at - 05
Observed process — "C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\winkey.exe"
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 06
Observed process — C:\Windows\system32\services.exe
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 07
File written: Download-1.tmp — C:\Windows\ServiceProfiles\LocalService\AppData\Local\FontCache\Fonts\Download-1.tmp
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 08
File written: Cab29DB.tmp — C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\Cab29DB.tmp
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 09
Contacted host: subca.ocsp-certum.com — Contact observed during runtime.
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 10
Contacted host: ccsca2021.ocsp-certum.com — Contact observed during runtime.
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
Signatures and behavior heuristics
A community signature or high-severity behavioral heuristic matched. Signatures identify known patterns; heuristics are strong leads but are not proof on their own.
The saved runtime evidence maps this activity to MITRE T1055 (Process Injection). The mapping supports possible process injection, but it does not prove the exact injection method or the operator's intent.
EvidenceC:\Windows\System32\svchost.exe -k NetworkService -pSandbox observed process activity targeting LSASS (Windows credential store). Legitimate software has no business reading LSASS memory — this is Mimikatz-shape behaviour.
EvidenceC:\Windows\system32\lsass.exe
0 of 75 engines flagged this file
View all 75 engine results
Section entropy & packers
A known packer signature (UPX / Themida / VMProtect / etc.) matched this file. Packers aren't malicious on their own, but most malware uses them.
Packers compress or encrypt the executable and only unpack it at runtime. Legitimate commercial software uses them too — but if the file is also unsigned and rare, it's a strong malware signal.
How widely this file has been seen
Widely seen in the wild for a long time. High prior this is legitimate; isolated detections on common-old files are usually false positives.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- winkey.exe
- Format
- Win32 EXE
- Code signing
- Signature valid: Peter Panisz
- Size
- 280.1 KB
- Last analyzed
- Oct 7, 2026, 3:06 PM UTC
8e5028fdeaebece7aa5a376397fe6d498b30829e9ab1da28c318c8175ed3f29aSafety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file is dangerous. Treat it as harmful and remove it.
- Recovery step 01
Don't run this file. Delete this file from the device, then empty the Recycle Bin or Trash.
- Recovery step 02
If you already ran it, disconnect from the internet and start with a full antivirus scan or Microsoft Defender Offline scan. If compromise is suspected or the problem persists, use a reputable second-opinion scanner and follow incident-recovery or clean-reinstall guidance.
- Recovery step 03
If you typed any passwords while it was open, change them from a device you trust.
- Recovery step 04
Get a fresh copy from the developer's official site or an official app store.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is winkey.exe a virus?
What is winkey.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected winkey.exe?
What should I do if I already ran winkey.exe?
How do I remove winkey.exe?
Is winkey.exe digitally signed?
What is the SHA-256 hash of winkey.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of winkey.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.