File verdict·MT AI Engine assessment

Our call: Is simpleunlocker_release (1).zip safe?Suspicious

Do not open or extract it until verified
42Safety ratingElevated risk

ZIP archive containing MSIL binaries that exhibit process injection and contact external IPs, flagged by three tier-1 engines.

distool
Evidence snapshot
  • 1 high-confidence signature or behavior rule matched this file.Derived · Signature and behavior rules
  • 10 of 74 antivirus engines flagged the file, including Fortinet and Google.Observed · Antivirus analysis
  • The hash has a long, established submission history across 3,098 sources.Derived · Submission history
simpleunlocker_release (1).zip
944.0 KB
9768bf823d8f801913225651d78f
Antivirus
10 of 74 flagged
Sandbox
Runtime complete
Code signing
Not applicable
First seen
First seen 1y ago

Recommended next actions

01

Before opening or extracting

Do not open or extract it until the source can be verified independently.

02

If you already opened or extracted it

Stop using it, scan the device, and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts. Get a fresh copy from the original trusted source and verify its exact hash when possible.

Scan transparency

Coverage & freshness

4 of 5 complete

Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.

  • Antivirus

    Complete

    10 of 74 engines flagged the file.

  • Sandbox

    Complete

    1 isolated runtime environment contributed observations.

  • Network

    Partial

    1 of 3 contacted hosts were cross-checked; coverage is incomplete.

  • YARA

    Complete

    2 signature or behavior rules matched.

  • External intel

    Complete

    3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.

Recorded behavior

Attack story

Runtime observations grouped by analysis stage. Arrows organize the stages; they do not claim chronology or causality.

ObservedDerived

7 recorded facts from one runtime window. Every fact remains independently traceable in Analyst mode.

Chapter 02

Intelligence

The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.

MT AI Engine · Verdict analysis

The reasoning behind this verdict

This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.

68%Confidence
High
Analyst conclusion

Three tier-1 engines detect malicious behavior and the sandbox shows process injection plus direct-IP traffic. No strong family consensus exists and dropped children returned clean, leaving mixed signals.

Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
  • tier1FamilyConsensus.strong=false (only 1 tier-1 engine on 'behavior' label) and 14 tier-1 engines reported clean.
  • droppedChildren.hasMaliciousChild=false and contactedHosts.maliciousHosts.length=0 — no confirmed malicious child or cached host hit.
  • prevalence is common_old rather than rare_new, which can indicate a long-lived PUA or cracked utility rather than fresh malware campaign.

These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.

Recommended action

Treat as untrusted; delete the archive and do not run any extracted executables until a definitive clean verdict is obtained from multiple high-trust scanners.

Chapter 03

Behavior

Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.

What this file does

Observed actions and their security significance

  • High concern: Injected code into another process, a technique that can conceal execution.

  • High concern: Attempted to impair or bypass security controls.

  • High concern: Manipulated how the operating system loads code, which can redirect execution.

  • Moderate concern: Runs hidden system commands (script or shell).

  • Moderate concern: Removed execution artefacts or logs, which can conceal activity.

  • Moderate concern: Communicated over a common application protocol; malware can use this for command-and-control.

  • Moderate concern: Communicates over the network in a non-standard way.

These are observed capabilities from an isolated analysis. A technique does not prove malicious intent on its own, and the file never ran on your device.

Chapter 04

Detection & Forensics

Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.

Chapter 05

Safety & FAQ

Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.

What to do now

We couldn't fully clear this file. Treat it with caution.

  1. Don't open or extract it unless you're certain it came from a source you trust.

  2. Check where you got it — an unexpected attachment or a random download link is a red flag.

  3. If its origin cannot be confirmed, delete this archive and use a fresh copy from a trusted source. Get a fresh copy from the original trusted source and verify its exact hash when possible.

  4. If you're still unsure, scan it again in a day or two — detections often catch up on newer files.

Frequently asked

Safety FAQ

  • simpleunlocker_release (1).zip is suspicious — treat it as unsafe until you're sure. 10 of 74 antivirus engines flag it (family: distool); that detection signal contributes to the cautious verdict. Don't open or extract it unless you fully trust where it came from. Get a fresh copy from the original trusted source and verify its exact hash when possible.
The raw file is processed temporarily and is not retained after processing. Its hash and report are public and permanent, so the next person who checks the same file gets an instant answer. Unknown files may be submitted to VirusTotal for analysis. If you ran this file on your computer and are worried, scan your system with an up-to-date antivirus and change critical passwords from a different device.