File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is this PDF document safe? Yes, no threats found.
None of the 63 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this PDF document, and opening it in a sandboxed PDF viewer showed only ordinary viewer activity with no high-risk…
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
This PDF document can be opened if you expect it from the sender. Keep your PDF reader updated, and be careful with any links inside that ask for credentials.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Open it only if you trust the person or website it came from.
Keep your security software and system updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
0 of 63 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 63
- No result 11
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Completed
- First seen 2mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
1 point against it and 3 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
When the document was opened in a PDF viewer under analysis, only the viewer and its helper processes ran, and no injection or suspicious network activity was recorded. The document is rarely submitted and was first seen on Jul 29, 2026.
None of the 63 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this PDF document, and every major antivirus engine returned a clean result. The sandbox runs show the document being opened by Adobe Acrobat and Reader, along with their crash-reporting and log helpers, which is normal viewer activity. The sandbox summary mapped two techniques, but no injected process or credential-store access was recorded, so those labels carry no weight. The only network contact was a public DNS resolver that belongs to the analysis machine's background traffic. The document is rarely submitted, and our own static review of its contents was not available, but nothing in the evidence points to a hostile document.
What We Detected
None of the 63 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this PDF document, including 18 major antivirus engines such as Kaspersky, BitDefender, ESET and Microsoft. It was first seen on Jul 29, 2026 and has been submitted by a single source.
Threat Behavior
In the sandbox runs, the document was opened in Adobe Acrobat and Reader. Only the viewer and its crash and log helpers ran, and they wrote ordinary temporary files. No process injection was recorded, and the only network contact was the analysis machine's own DNS background traffic. Two technique labels appeared in the summary without any supporting activity, so they do not indicate harmful behaviour.
What To Do Now
The document appears to be an ordinary PDF. As with any document, open it only if you expect it from its sender, and be careful with any links inside that ask you to log in or download files.
Where this verdict could be wrong1 caveat
- The document has been submitted by only one source, and our own static analysis of its contents was not available, so embedded links could not be reviewed.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 63 antivirus engines that checked it flagged it, including all 18 major antivirus engines.
- Opening it in a PDF viewer showed only normal viewer activity.
- No process injection or contact with a host belonging to the document was recorded.
- The document is rarely submitted, with only one source seen.
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 13sandbox rule tags
- 7spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 34filesystem & mutex artifacts
Includes 13 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 5 dropped files.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
None of the 63 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- File name
- PDF document
- Format
- Size
- 193.4 kB
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Last analyzed
- Jul 29, 2026, 10:30 PM UTC
- SHA-256
9959c82fa7ebb964a272c40bd833080864fcbe4c6abf3746a538a7a435f10f4a- SHA-1
fc716b7d0faffe907db153b326dd61d6f621e1a5- MD5
5611f68c0b7b328aa6f9a4f344a0c005
First scanned Updated
Verdict history
- Not fully confirmed
- Safeafter a re-check of the saved evidence
Ratings change when antivirus engines, our checks or MalwareTips staff learn more about a file.
Includes every engine result (74), 2 matched signature rules and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is this PDF document safe?
What is this PDF document?
How many antivirus engines detected this PDF document?
What is the SHA-256 hash of this PDF document?
Is it safe to open this PDF document?
How up to date is this analysis of this PDF document?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.