File scan report
Verdict Suspicious
Is MD5_
One of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it raised a generic machine-learning alert, but the unsigned executable lacks runtime, static, prevalence, and publisher evidence…
Read the whole reasonShow less
Why Suspicious? One antivirus engine (Malwarebytes) flags it; nothing else confirms it.
Limited evidence · One sign points to a problem; nothing else confirms it.
If it came from a link, an attachment or a stranger, delete it.
What to do now4 steps
Some signs point to a problem, but nothing confirms it is harmful. Treat it with caution.
What to do
Don't run it unless you're sure where it came from.
Check where you got it: an unexpected attachment, a link someone sent you or a re-upload is a red flag.
If you can't confirm where it came from, delete it. If you need the program, download it again from the publisher's own website.
If you already ran it
Stop using it, run a full scan with your antivirus and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts.
Not sure what to do?
Ask the MalwareTips community before you run it. If you already ran it, follow the cleanup guide.
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
1 of 65 flagged
- Flagged 1
- No detection 64
- No result 10
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Not run
- First seen 2y ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
3 points against it and 3 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
Malwarebytes alone flagged the executable with a generic machine-learning label; no major antivirus engines identified malware or named a family. That isolated alert is likely a false positive, but the file is unsigned and lacks completed runtime or static examination, so its safety cannot be established confidently.
One of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable, using a generic machine-learning label rather than identifying a malware family. No major antivirus engines detected it, which substantially weakens the isolated alert. The file is unsigned and has no established publisher history, so there is no strong benign identity anchor. No completed observation from the test run or static examination is available, and no complete contacted-host reputation result exists. Files built with the same import table mostly received favorable prior decisions, but their differing publishers make that similarity weak. The available evidence therefore points toward a probable false alarm without establishing that these exact bytes are benign.
What We Detected
Malwarebytes was the only engine to flag the executable among 75 engines, assigning a generic machine-learning anomaly label. No major antivirus engines identified a threat, and there was no agreement on a malware family.
Threat Behavior
No completed observation from the test run or static examination is available for these bytes. A complete contacted-host reputation result is also unavailable.
What To Do Now
Keep security software enabled and verify the file's origin before running it. If the source cannot be authenticated, avoid execution until the exact file can be examined in an isolated environment or confirmed by its publisher.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- Only one of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file, and the label is generic rather than a named malware family.
- No major antivirus engines detected it, while 15 major antivirus engines reported no detection.
- Four files built with the same import table previously received safe decisions, although their different publishers make those matches weak.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- No major antivirus engines detected the file.
- Only one of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged it, and the alert did not identify a malware family.
- No malware-specific community rules or public sample-database listing matched the hash.
- The executable is unsigned, so its publisher cannot be authenticated.
- One antivirus engine raised a generic machine-learning anomaly alert.
- No completed runtime or static examination is available to explain what the executable does.
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
Technical details
1 of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flags it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 1
- MalwarebytesMachineLearning/Anomalous.95%
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Apr 20, 2026, 8:00 PM UTC
- SHA-256
99cf802bec942be688352e3c0ccd1158250bd88cd38ea4cb6c5ef3bcecd5b21e- SHA-1
227a3d41d9fa9f07682e22799366668c817a23be- MD5
ea2d2d6003c858771eec344ac6aa494a
About this file
MD5_Hash_Changer.exe is a Win32 EXE file of 141.8 kB.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 141.8 kB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- May 20, 2024On VirusTotal.
First scanned Updated
Includes every engine result (75).
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is MD5_Hash_Changer.exe safe, or is it malware?
What is MD5_Hash_Changer.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected MD5_Hash_Changer.exe?
I already downloaded and ran MD5_Hash_Changer.exe — what should I do?
What is the SHA-256 hash of MD5_Hash_Changer.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of MD5_Hash_Changer.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.
