File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is Blox
No antivirus engine flagged this exact release archive, and its clean sandbox result plus established GitHub release identity outweigh the unconfirmed behavior mappings.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Open it only if you trust the person or website you got it from.
Keep your security software and system updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Antivirus results
0 of 67 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 67
- No result 8
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Completed
- First seen 1mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
2 points against it and 5 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
None of the 67 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the archive, including all 17 major antivirus engines that returned results.
The archive drew no malicious or suspicious detection from 75 engines, with all 17 reporting major antivirus engines silent. Its SHA-256 exactly matches the v5.4.1 asset published by an established GitHub repository, providing strong provenance evidence. One completed sandbox run returned a clean result, and the complete reputation check of its five observed hosts found no known hostile endpoint. The test run nevertheless mapped possible process injection and impairment of defenses, but it identified no injected target or method and found no persistence. Eight extracted files lack saved individual verdicts, so that file it created coverage remains incomplete despite the absence of a known malicious child. Overall, the provenance and broad detection silence outweigh those uncorroborated behavioral mappings.
What We Detected
None of the 67 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the ZIP archive, including the 17 major antivirus engines that returned results. The file is byte-identical to the BloxDump v5.4.1 asset published by the established EmK530/BloxDump repository.
Threat Behavior
One completed sandbox run returned a clean result. It mapped possible process injection and impairment of defenses, but recorded no injected target, injection method, persistence, malicious child, or known hostile host. The observed GitHub downloads are consistent with fetching a dependency, while two separately identified background contacts were excluded from sample activity.
What To Do Now
Obtain the archive from the project's official release page and verify its SHA-256 as 9aa6e93f349c7ff1db3045360b4c9bcad41be2e1eeaeb37dc490d653ac73f0ad. Keep security software enabled, particularly because the archive contains executables and eight extracted files do not have saved individual verdicts.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- Runtime mapping included possible process injection and impairment of defenses, although no injected process, injection method, persistence, or hostile endpoint was identified.
- Eight extracted files have no saved individual verdicts, so their contents are not independently cleared by file it created results.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- Byte-identical to BloxDump.v5.4.1.zip in EmK530/BloxDump release v5.4.1 (published Sep 12, 2026).
- No engine among the 75-engine network flagged the archive.
- All 17 major antivirus engines that returned results reported no detection.
- The completed sandbox run returned a clean result and identified no persistence.
- The reputation check covered all five distinct observed hosts and found no known malicious or suspicious matches.
- The test run mapped possible process injection and impairment of defenses, although it did not identify a target or concrete injection method.
- The archive contains executable content, and eight extracted files lack saved individual verdicts.
7 sources checked · all complete. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 11sandbox rule tags
- 9spawned processes
- 4network contacts
- 31filesystem & mutex artifacts
Includes the sandbox verdicts, 11 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 8 dropped files.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
None of the 67 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
7 sources checked · all complete. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 15, 2026, 4:04 AM UTC
- SHA-256
9aa6e93f349c7ff1db3045360b4c9bcad41be2e1eeaeb37dc490d653ac73f0ad- SHA-1
44a3ce877dc4234fd2811fa1efef0d865806acad- MD5
f4f3f20cef5066a2739be0f254886dbf
About this file
BloxDump.v5.4.1.zip is a ZIP file of 11.9 MB.
- Type and size
- ZIP · 11.9 MB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Sep 13, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 31 distinct sources
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75), 1 matched signature rule and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is BloxDump.v5.4.1.zip safe?
What is BloxDump.v5.4.1.zip?
How many antivirus engines detected BloxDump.v5.4.1.zip?
What is the SHA-256 hash of BloxDump.v5.4.1.zip?
Is it safe to open or extract BloxDump.v5.4.1.zip?
How up to date is this analysis of BloxDump.v5.4.1.zip?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.