File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is cerberus_
None of the 62 engines that analysed this Windows cabinet archive flagged it, and no malware database or rule set holds a match for it.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
No hostile evidence was found, so there is no reason to treat this archive as dangerous. Keep your antivirus protection enabled and scan the archive before extracting anything from it, especially if it came from an unfamiliar download source.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Open it only if you trust the person or website you got it from.
Keep your security software and system updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Antivirus results
0 of 62 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 62
- No result 14
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Not run
- First seen 7mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
2 points against it and 4 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This is a compressed cabinet archive first seen on Mar 22, 2026. None of the 62 engines that analysed it reported anything, including all 18 major antivirus engines, and no malware database or malware-specific rule set holds a match. Nothing hostile turned up, though the contents of the archive were not opened in our own analysis, so treat it as unchecked rather than proven clean.
The file is a Windows cabinet archive of about 4 MB, first seen on Mar 22, 2026 and submitted by a single source. Antivirus coverage is broad: 62 of the 62 antivirus engines that checked it returned a result and every one of them came back clean, including the major antivirus engines such as BitDefender, ESET, Kaspersky, Microsoft, Fortinet and Avast. No engine produced even a generic or rule-based label, so there is no family name or detection pattern to explain away. Reference databases are equally quiet: the sample-sharing database lookups found no listing, no malware-specific community rule matched, and there is no known-good software reference entry either. Our own observation from the test run and content inspection were not available, and the contacted-host reputation check was not completed, so nothing inside the archive was individually reviewed. On this evidence — no detections of any kind and no corroborating hostile signal — the file does not show malware characteristics.
What We Detected
The file is a Windows cabinet archive (CAB), roughly 4 MB in size, first seen on Mar 22, 2026. It carries no code signature, which is normal for this container format and tells us nothing either way about the author. The file name suggests game custom content, but that is only a naming convention and was not verified.
Detection results are uniformly empty: 62 of the 62 antivirus engines that checked it returned a result for this file and none of them flagged it, not even with a generic or machine-learning label. All 18 major antivirus engines — among them BitDefender, ESET, Kaspersky, Microsoft, Fortinet, Avast, Avira and GData — reported it as clean.
Threat Behavior
No sandbox execution was carried out for this file, so there is no observed behaviour in the test run to describe: no process activity, no network contacts and no dropped files were recorded. The contacted-host reputation cross-check was also not completed, so we cannot say anything about which destinations, if any, any extracted program might reach.
The archive was not unpacked in our own analysis, so the files inside it were not reviewed individually. External checks were completed and all came back empty — no listing in the public sample-sharing database, no malware-specific community rules matched, and no reference-database entry in either direction.
What To Do Now
Nothing hostile is associated with this archive in any source we consulted, so there is no need to delete it. Because the contents were never opened here, keep your antivirus protection switched on and let it scan the archive before you extract anything from it, particularly if you received it from a download site or a third party rather than from a project you already trust.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- The archive was never unpacked in our own analysis, so the individual files inside it were not reviewed by name, type or capability; antivirus silence on a compressed container is only as good as each engine's unpacking depth.
- With a single submitter and no runtime or host-reputation check, the absence of hostile evidence partly reflects the limited observation available rather than proof that nothing harmful is inside.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 62 engines that analysed the file flagged it, including all 18 major antivirus engines such as BitDefender, ESET, Kaspersky, Microsoft and Fortinet.
- No listing in the public malware sample-sharing database, no malware-specific community rule matches, and no known-malicious reference-database entry.
- No brand masquerade is present, and the name and structure do not imitate security software, a research tool or a portable executable.
- No prior reports or staff-reviewed complaints exist against this file.
- There is very little distribution history: the archive was first seen on Mar 22, 2026 and submitted by a single source, so there is no wider track record to compare it against.
- The contents of the archive were not unpacked during our own analysis, and no observation from the test run was recorded, so anything inside it was not individually reviewed.
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
Technical details
None of the 62 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Nov 7, 2026, 8:35 AM UTC
- SHA-256
9bc2264eccb3c3204fc9dca8e0f9f4b15100b0a3a941e33acc0af85280c7a3b4- SHA-1
9dbdadeeae32492033b3f2a5921b5b5b40255621- MD5
aec57821fd9deefadbaa66eba08f18fe
About this file
cerberus_tricoufamily_eli_hair_kids.package is a CAB file of 4.1 MB.
- Type and size
- CAB · 4.1 MB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Mar 22, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 1 sourceRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
First scanned
Antivirus consensus
0 of 62 engines flagged this file
14 of the 76 engines returned no result for this file (file type not supported, or the scan did not finish), so they did not check it.
- Tier-118 engines0flagged
- Tier-232 engines0flagged
- Low-trust12 engines0flagged
View all 76 engine results
- AcronisClean
- AhnLab-V3Clean
- AlibabaNo result
- alibabacloudClean
- ALYacClean
- Antiy-AVLClean
- APEXNo result
- ArcabitClean
- AvastClean
- Avast-MobileNo result
- AVGClean
- AviraClean
- BaiduClean
- BitDefenderClean
- BitDefenderFalxNo result
- BkavClean
- CAT-QuickHealClean
- ClamAVClean
- CMCClean
- CrowdStrikeClean
- CTXClean
- CylanceNo result
- CynetClean
- DeepInstinctNo result
- DrWebClean
- ElasticNo result
- EmsisoftClean
- ESET-NOD32Clean
- F-SecureClean
- FortinetClean
- GDataClean
- GoogleClean
- GridinsoftClean
- huorongClean
- IkarusClean
- JiangminClean
- K7AntiVirusClean
- K7GWClean
- KasperskyClean
- KingsoftClean
- LionicClean
- MalwarebytesClean
- MaxSecureClean
- McAfeeDClean
- MicrosoftClean
- MicroWorld-eScanClean
- NANO-AntivirusClean
- PaloaltoNo result
- PandaClean
- RisingClean
- SangforClean
- SentinelOneNo result
- SkyhighClean
- SophosClean
- SUPERAntiSpywareClean
- SymantecClean
- SymantecMobileInsightNo result
- TACHYONClean
- tehtrisNo result
- TencentClean
- TrapmineNo result
- TrellixENSClean
- TrendMicroClean
- TrendMicro-HouseCallClean
- TrustlookNo result
- VaristClean
- VBA32Clean
- VIPREClean
- VirITClean
- ViRobotClean
- WebrootNo result
- XcitiumClean
- YandexClean
- ZillyaClean
- ZoneAlarmClean
- ZonerClean
How widely this file has been seen
Rarely uploaded, and first seen more than two weeks ago. Often niche legitimate software or internal tooling; not a strong malware signal on its own.
Chapter 04
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is cerberus_tricoufamily_eli_hair_kids.package safe?
What is cerberus_tricoufamily_eli_hair_kids.package?
How many antivirus engines detected cerberus_tricoufamily_eli_hair_kids.package?
What is the SHA-256 hash of cerberus_tricoufamily_eli_hair_kids.package?
Is it safe to open or extract cerberus_tricoufamily_eli_hair_kids.package?
How up to date is this analysis of cerberus_tricoufamily_eli_hair_kids.package?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.