File scan report
Verdict Low Risk
Is ender-
This Java archive with a bypass-style name shows no engine detections, but it is rarely submitted and its contents have not been inspected, so its safety cannot be confirmed.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Why not Safe? We could not confirm who made it.
Limited evidence · Nothing points to a problem, but little confirms who made it.
Avoid running this archive unless you trust its source and author; keep your antivirus enabled if you do.
Good practice2 tips
Low Risk: no threat found, but we could not fully confirm this file.
Get it from the publisher's own website or app store, not from a re-upload or a link someone sent you.
Keep your security software on, and stop if the file does anything you didn't expect.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
0 of 65 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 65
- No result 8
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Completed
- First seen 3mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
3 points against it and 2 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this Java archive, and the combined sandbox verdict was clean. However, its name suggests a cheat or bypass tool, only five sources have submitted it, and nobody has examined the code inside. Engines often miss threats packed in Java archives, so the evidence is too thin for a firm call.
The file is a small Java archive first seen on Jul 20, 2026, submitted by five distinct sources. None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged it, including all major antivirus engines, and the combined sandbox verdict was clean with no named injection targets. Java archives compress their class files, so antivirus silence on them carries less weight than on ordinary programs. The file name uses a bypass-style word common to game cheats and loaders, a category frequently abused to spread stealers. Without a signature, a published release match, a known-software reference entry or an inspection of its contents, there is no positive evidence of who made it or what it does.
What We Detected
None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this Java archive, and the major antivirus engines reported it clean. It was first seen on Jul 20, 2026 and has been submitted by only five sources. Its name suggests a cheat or bypass tool.
Threat Behavior
The combined sandbox verdict was clean: the sample started Java, wrote ordinary Java runtime files and made no network contact of its own. Sandbox technique labels that appear on most legitimate software were recorded without any matching activity. Nobody has examined the classes inside the archive, so hidden functionality cannot be ruled out.
What To Do Now
Only run this file if you obtained it from a source you trust and know its author. Cheat and bypass tools for games are a common way to spread password stealers, so keep your security software enabled and consider submitting the file for a deeper inspection.
Where this verdict could be wrong1 caveat
- None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file and the combined sandbox verdict was clean, which may simply mean the archive is a harmless mod.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file
- The combined sandbox verdict was clean with no injection into other processes
- The file name suggests a cheat or bypass tool, a category often used to spread stealers
- Only five sources have submitted this file
- The contents of the archive have not been inspected, and engines see little inside Java archives
6 sources checked · all complete. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 15sandbox rule tags
- 4spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 11filesystem & mutex artifacts
Includes the sandbox verdicts, 15 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 3 dropped files.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
None of the 65 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · all complete. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 14, 2026, 5:59 AM UTC
- SHA-256
9df9fafc4b18f15d1e2635ab3b345bf2b61f5b13ef8ce6a94ab65ebc6de42cd2- SHA-1
56a65d6f93ef2595c48d7f7c5e6eec18505661f6- MD5
f052dbce1e0483bfdbba4f19941ced2b
About this file
ender-bypass-1.0.0.jar is a JAR file of 25.9 kB.
- Type and size
- JAR · 25.9 kB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Jul 20, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 5 distinct sourcesRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
First scanned Updated
Verdict history
- Safe
- Low Riskafter a re-check of the saved evidence
Ratings change when antivirus engines, our checks or MalwareTips staff learn more about a file.
Includes every engine result (73), 1 matched signature rule and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 5 questions people ask most about this file.
Is ender-bypass-1.0.0.jar safe?
What is ender-bypass-1.0.0.jar?
How many antivirus engines detected ender-bypass-1.0.0.jar?
What is the SHA-256 hash of ender-bypass-1.0.0.jar?
How up to date is this analysis of ender-bypass-1.0.0.jar?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.