Is Faithful 64x - December 2025 Release.zip safe?
No engine detected a threat in this established ZIP archive, and its broad submission history offers strong additional reassurance.
None of 75 antivirus engines flagged the archive, including all 17 tier-1 engines. It has circulated broadly across 624 sources and 688 submissions, while independent intelligence produced no threat matches; however, no completed runtime observation was available.
a136d9101a47485585…fb805d0a812dacRecommended next actions
Before opening or extracting
Open or extract it only when its sender or download source has been independently verified.
If you already opened or extracted it
Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
None of 75 antivirus engines flagged the archive, including all 17 tier-1 engines. It has circulated broadly across 624 sources and 688 submissions, while independent intelligence produced no threat matches; however, no completed runtime observation was available.
The archive produced zero malicious or suspicious detections across 75 engines. All 17 tier-1 engines were non-detecting, including Microsoft, Kaspersky, ESET-NOD32, BitDefender, and Avast. The file is established rather than newly observed, with 688 submissions from 624 sources over 297 days. Research intelligence found no matching malware entry or YARA rule. No sandbox run completed, and host-reputation coverage was unavailable, so the conclusion primarily reflects static scanning and prevalence.
What We Detected
None of 75 antivirus engines flagged this ZIP archive as malicious or suspicious. All 17 tier-1 engines reported no detection, and no malware family was identified.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox run is available, so runtime behavior was not observed. The archive had no malicious child finding, and independent intelligence returned no MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, or YARAify match. A complete contacted-host reputation result is also unavailable.
What To Do Now
The evidence supports normal use when the archive came from the expected source. Keep endpoint protection enabled and scan extracted files before opening them, especially if the download source cannot be verified.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- behaviour.sandboxCount=0 means the archive received no completed runtime observation.
- contactedHosts=null means no complete reputation assessment exists for any hosts that extracted contents might contact.
- signing.applicable=false for this ZIP, so publisher identity cannot be authenticated through code signing.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/75 antivirus engines reported a malicious or suspicious result.
- All 17 tier-1 engines reported no detection.
- 624 sources and 688 submissions indicate broad, established circulation.
- MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, and YARAify returned no matching intelligence.
- No malicious dropped child was identified.
- No completed runtime observation was available.
- ZIP signing is not applicable, so publisher authenticity is not cryptographically established.
- No complete contacted-host reputation result is available.
Use the archive if it came from the expected distribution source. Keep endpoint protection enabled and scan its extracted contents before opening them.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete0 of 75 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 0 / 75engines flagged
- 624sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
The hash has a long, established submission history across 624 sources.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceDerivedSourceSubmission historyObserved at - 03
No completed runtime observation is available for this file.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceRuntime coverageObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
0 of 75 engines flagged this file
View all 75 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Widely seen in the wild for a long time. High prior this is legitimate; isolated detections on common-old files are usually false positives.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- Faithful 64x - December 2025 Release.zip
- Format
- ZIP
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 15.3 MB
- Last analyzed
- Oct 2, 2026, 8:56 PM UTC
a136d9101a4748558587980dace3cd7447b758fb72c4684d15fb805d0a812dacSafety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.
- Recovery step 01
Open or extract it only when its sender or download source has been independently verified.
- Recovery step 02
A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.
- Recovery step 03
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is Faithful 64x - December 2025 Release.zip safe?
What is Faithful 64x - December 2025 Release.zip?
How many antivirus engines detected Faithful 64x - December 2025 Release.zip?
What is the SHA-256 hash of Faithful 64x - December 2025 Release.zip?
Is it safe to open or extract Faithful 64x - December 2025 Release.zip?
How up to date is this analysis of Faithful 64x - December 2025 Release.zip?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.