Threat LensFile scan report

Is POCO safe?

Verdict
Safe

No engine detected this established, verified CD PROJEKT DLL, while prevalence and five signer-matched prior samples strongly support legitimate commodity software.

None of 74 antivirus engines flagged the DLL, including all 17 reporting tier-1 engines. Its verified CD PROJEKT signature, established prevalence, and five signer-matched prior samples support legitimate software; the isolated T1055 mapping lacks a malicious sandbox verdict or corroborating artifacts.

Open with normal care

Use the file if it came with an official CD PROJEKT product and its signature remains valid. Keep endpoint protection enabled and replace it from the official installer if its origin is uncertain.

Read the full analysis
Saved file evidenceAntivirus consensus
0of 74 flagged
Flagged 0No detection 74
Digital specimenPOCOaaf856dcea277b53a5…befbe6a19e55f5
Size401.6 KB
Code signingCD PROJEKT S.A.
SandboxRuntime complete
First seen1y ago
Evidence3 priority signals
0 of 74 antivirus engines flagged the file.

Recommended next actions

01

Before opening

Open it only when its sender or download source is one you independently trust.

02

If you already opened it

Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.

Chapter 02

Intelligence

The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.

MT AI Engine · Verdict analysis

The reasoning behind this verdict

This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.

94%Confidence
Very high
Analyst conclusion

None of 74 antivirus engines flagged the DLL, including all 17 reporting tier-1 engines. Its verified CD PROJEKT signature, established prevalence, and five signer-matched prior samples support legitimate software; the isolated T1055 mapping lacks a malicious sandbox verdict or corroborating artifacts.

Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
  • behaviour.offensiveTechniques includes T1055 (Process Injection), although the saved evidence does not establish the exact injection method or malicious intent.
  • signing.signerStats.totalSamples=1 provides limited direct historical depth, though five separate signer-matched prior decisions support the same publisher.
  • contactedHosts=null, so no completed host-reputation cross-check is available; the observed sandbox contact lists were empty.

These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.

Recommended action

Use the file if it came with an official CD PROJEKT product and its signature remains valid. Keep endpoint protection enabled and replace it from the official installer if its origin is uncertain.

Scan transparency

Coverage & freshness

4 of 5 complete

Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.

  • Antivirus

    Complete

    0 of 74 engines flagged the file.

  • Sandbox

    Complete

    1 isolated runtime environment contributed observations.

  • Network

    Not run

    No contacted-host reputation check is recorded.

    No timestamp recorded
  • YARA

    Complete

    1 signature or behavior rule matched.

  • External intel

    Complete

    3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.

Chapter 03

Behavior

Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.

Runtime flight recorder

Capture complete
  • 1isolated sandbox run
  • 10MITRE ATT&CK techniques
  • 9spawned processes
  • 0network contacts
  • 7filesystem & mutex artifacts
Recorded behavior

Attack story

Runtime observations grouped by analysis stage. Arrows organize the stages; they do not claim chronology or causality.

ObservedDerived

5 recorded facts from one runtime window. Every fact remains independently traceable in Analyst mode.

Chapter 04

Detection & Forensics

Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.

Chapter 05

Safety & FAQ

Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.

What to do now

This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.

  1. Recovery step 01

    Open it only when its sender or download source is one you independently trust.

  2. Recovery step 02

    A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.

  3. Recovery step 03

    Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.

Safety FAQ

Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.

7 evidence-based answers
Is POCO safe?
Evidence-based answer
POCO appears safe. 0 of 74 antivirus engines flagged it. It carries a verified digital signature from CD PROJEKT S.A.. Open it only when its sender or download source is one you independently trust.
What is POCO?
Evidence-based answer
POCO is a file, about 402 KB. Our analysis did not identify a verdict-driving threat signal. It carries a verified digital signature from CD PROJEKT S.A.. A file's name can be reused by different files, so we identify it by its cryptographic hash (below).
How many antivirus engines detected POCO?
Evidence-based answer
None — 0 of 74 antivirus engines flagged POCO. That's reassuring, though it is not proof that a file is safe, so we also weigh its behaviour, identity, and reputation.
Is POCO digitally signed?
Evidence-based answer
Yes — POCO carries a valid digital signature from CD PROJEKT S.A., which confirms the file hasn't been tampered with since that publisher signed it. A valid signature is a positive signal, but note that malware is occasionally signed with stolen or abused certificates, so it isn't proof of safety on its own.
What is the SHA-256 hash of POCO?
Evidence-based answer
The SHA-256 hash of POCO is aaf856dcea277b53a5a2205e1fd035777d093f33d761170e76befbe6a19e55f5, and its MD5 is 316a06afb88cef6b29cb35f99de65f01. This hash is the file's unique fingerprint — two files with the same SHA-256 are identical. Use it to confirm you're looking at exactly this file (not just one with the same name) when comparing against antivirus databases or a download's published checksum.
Is it safe to open POCO?
Evidence-based answer
Based on the recorded evidence, POCO has a low observed risk and is properly signed. The important caveat is source: make sure you downloaded it from the official website or a trusted store, because attackers sometimes distribute malware-laced copies under a legitimate file's name. If your own antivirus flags it, verify the source and the exact hash before overriding the warning.
How up to date is this analysis of POCO?
Evidence-based answer
This report reflects the scan run on September 23, 2026. Because a file's hash never changes, the identity of POCO is fixed — but antivirus coverage improves over time, so a file that looks clean today can pick up detections later (and vice-versa). If you need the latest picture, MalwareTips staff can re-run the analysis from scratch.
Chapter 06

Community

Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.

The raw file is processed temporarily and is not retained after processing. Its hash and report are public and permanent, so the next person who checks the same file gets an instant answer. Unknown files may be submitted to VirusTotal for analysis. If you ran this file on your computer and are worried, scan your system with an up-to-date antivirus and change critical passwords from a different device.