Is Blade_Ball_NEW.rbxl safe?
No antivirus engine detected the 902-day-old file, and established prevalence plus absent research-intelligence matches provide strong static evidence against the unsupported comment allegations.
None of 74 antivirus engines flagged this file, including 18 tier-1 engines that reported no detection. It has been observed for 902 days across 63 sources without a named family or external-intelligence match, although no completed runtime or contacted-host assessment is available.
abae0400484b465fe7…690f4b8820b8baRecommended next actions
Before opening
Open it only when its sender or download source is one you independently trust.
If you already opened it
Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
None of 74 antivirus engines flagged this file, including 18 tier-1 engines that reported no detection. It has been observed for 902 days across 63 sources without a named family or external-intelligence match, although no completed runtime or contacted-host assessment is available.
Static scanning found no detection from any of 74 antivirus engines, with all 18 reporting tier-1 engines silent. The file has existed for 902 days and appeared through 63 sources, reducing concern that it is an unrecognized newly distributed sample. MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL supplied no corroborating match. Community annotations allege malicious behavior, but the comment channel was marked as containing instruction-like contamination and the claims lack engine or intelligence support. No sandbox run or complete contacted-host reputation result is available, so the assessment does not claim observed benign runtime behavior.
What We Detected
None of 74 antivirus engines flagged the file. The reporting set included 18 tier-1 engines with no detection, including Avast, BitDefender, ESET-NOD32, Kaspersky, and Microsoft. No malware family was identified, and MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL returned no matching intelligence.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox observation is available because behaviour is null. Contacted-host reputation was also not checked or saved, so network activity cannot be characterized. Community comments allege stealer and trojan behavior, but their text channel was marked as contaminated and those unsupported claims were excluded from the decision.
What To Do Now
The static evidence does not indicate malware. Obtain the file from a trusted source, keep endpoint protection enabled, and use the intended Roblox Studio workflow; seek a fresh sandbox assessment if the file behaves unexpectedly or came from an untrusted sender.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- file.reputation=-1 is mildly negative, although it is not supported by any antivirus detection or named threat family.
- communityComments contain stealer and trojan allegations, but adversarialInputFlags.commentInjectionSuspected=true and the annotations have zero votes; they were downweighted.
- behaviour=null and contactedHosts=null leave runtime activity and contacted-host reputation unverified.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/74 antivirus engines reported a detection.
- All 18 reporting tier-1 engines returned no detection.
- No MalwareBazaar, YARAify, or CIRCL match was recorded.
- Observed for 902 days across 63 sources.
- No malicious dropped child or brand mismatch was reported.
- No completed runtime observation is available.
- Contacted-host reputation was not checked or saved.
- The file has a mildly negative reputation score of -1.
- Unverified community annotations allege stealer and trojan activity.
Use the file only if it came from a trusted source and opens through the expected application. Keep endpoint protection enabled and rescan or sandbox it if its behavior differs from expectations.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete0 of 74 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 0 / 74engines flagged
- 63sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
0 of 74 antivirus engines flagged the file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
No completed runtime observation is available for this file.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceRuntime coverageObserved at - 03
The hash has been submitted 68 times from 63 sources.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
0 of 74 engines flagged this file
View all 74 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Moderate prevalence — neither rare nor common. No strong prior applies.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- Blade_Ball_NEW.rbxl
- Format
- unknown
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 693.4 KB
- Last analyzed
- Oct 4, 2026, 3:17 AM UTC
abae0400484b465fe735ff3beb898600b7994feec5f530d91d690f4b8820b8baSafety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.
- Recovery step 01
Open it only when its sender or download source is one you independently trust.
- Recovery step 02
A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.
- Recovery step 03
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is Blade_Ball_NEW.rbxl safe?
What is Blade_Ball_NEW.rbxl?
How many antivirus engines detected Blade_Ball_NEW.rbxl?
What is the SHA-256 hash of Blade_Ball_NEW.rbxl?
Is it safe to open Blade_Ball_NEW.rbxl?
How up to date is this analysis of Blade_Ball_NEW.rbxl?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.