Is XenoUI.dll safe?
No antivirus engine identified malware, and observed activity lacked offensive techniques, although generic YARA matches, uncertain signing, and an unchecked IP contact warrant caution.
All 75 antivirus engines avoided flagging this DLL, including 17 high-trust engines, and one completed sandbox run produced no malicious verdict or offensive technique. Generic YARA matches, an uncertain signature, and one direct-IP connection prevent absolute assurance, especially because the contacted host was not reputation-checked.
ae6fc5ba07dc314423…283c32b24a56fcRecommended next actions
Before using
Use it only as part of software obtained from the developer's official site or another source you independently trust.
If you already used it
Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
All 75 antivirus engines avoided flagging this DLL, including 17 high-trust engines, and one completed sandbox run produced no malicious verdict or offensive technique. Generic YARA matches, an uncertain signature, and one direct-IP connection prevent absolute assurance, especially because the contacted host was not reputation-checked.
The strongest evidence is the complete absence of detections across 75 engines, with all 17 reporting tier-1 engines remaining silent. One completed sandbox observation recorded seven benign-common techniques, no offensive techniques, no persistence indicators, and no malicious runtime verdict. Seven community YARA rules matched, but the disclosed names describe broad implementation features such as .NET, Go, certificates, TLS callbacks, and debugger checks rather than a named threat. The signature attributed to Rizve A has no established history, and the invalid-signature tag means it cannot materially support trust. A direct connection to 162.159.36.2 was observed, but contactedHosts is unavailable, so no complete reputation conclusion can be made about that contact.
What We Detected
No antivirus engine flagged the sample: 0 of 75 reported it as malicious or suspicious, including all 17 reporting high-trust engines. Seven community YARA rules matched, but the disclosed rules identify broad technical characteristics such as .NET or Go code, a digital certificate, TLS callbacks, network functionality, and debugger checks; none names a malware family.
Threat Behavior
One completed sandbox run recorded seven benign-common MITRE techniques and zero offensive techniques. It produced no malicious sandbox verdict, wrote no recorded files, established no recorded persistence, and dropped no listed child hashes. The sample contacted 162.159.36.2 directly, but no complete host-reputation result is available because the contacted-host cross-check was not saved.
What To Do Now
Obtain the DLL from its official distribution channel and verify its hash or publisher documentation before loading it into an application. Keep endpoint protection enabled and consider isolated testing if the source is uncertain, particularly because the signer lacks history and the file carries an invalid-signature tag.
Where this verdict could be wrong4 caveats
- Seven YARAify rules matched, including DebuggerCheck__API and pe_detect_tls_callbacks; these traits can occur in evasive software even though no rule identifies a malware family.
- The sandbox observed direct-IP traffic to 162.159.36.2, and contactedHosts=null means its reputation was not completely cross-checked.
- One community annotation reported a suspicious sandbox score, although the structured behaviour record has no malicious sandbox verdict.
- The signing identity lacks historical statistics, and file.tags reports invalid-signature, so the signature cannot be treated as trusted-publisher evidence.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/75 antivirus engines reported a malicious or suspicious result.
- tier1Malicious=0 and tier1ReportedClean=17.
- behaviour.offensiveCount=0 in one completed sandbox run.
- behaviour.hasMaliciousSandboxVerdict=false.
- peAnalysis.highEntropyCode=false and peAnalysis.likelyPacked=false.
- externalIntel.yaraify.ruleCount=7 indicates several static rule matches.
- DebuggerCheck__API suggests debugger-detection capability.
- behaviour.contactedIps includes a direct connection to 162.159.36.2.
- contactedHosts=null leaves host-reputation coverage incomplete.
- file.tags includes invalid-signature.
- signing.signerStats.found=false for Rizve A.
Use the DLL only if it came from the expected official source and its hash can be independently verified. Keep endpoint protection enabled and isolate it for further testing if its origin is uncertain.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete0 of 75 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
Complete1 isolated runtime environment contributed observations.
Network
Partial1 runtime contact was observed without a completed reputation cross-check.
YARA
Complete6 signature or behavior rules matched.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime flight recorder
Capture complete- 1isolated sandbox run
- 7MITRE ATT&CK techniques
- 4spawned processes
- 1network contacts
- 1filesystem & mutex artifacts
Attack story
Runtime observations grouped by analysis stage. Arrows organize the stages; they do not claim chronology or causality.
Input file
The submitted object
- FileObserved
XenoUI.dll
ae6fc5ba07dc314423a518f93b8ad69a5730df780669fd3b40283c32b24a56fc
01Uploaded file
Processes
Runtime execution
- ProcessObserved
Observed process
"C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\program.exe"
02Isolated runtime analysis - ProcessObserved
Observed process
"C:\Users\user\Desktop\software.exe" -install
03Isolated runtime analysis - +1 more recorded observation in Analyst mode
Network
Hosts contacted
- Contacted hostObserved
162.159.36.2
Contact observed during runtime.
04Isolated runtime analysis
4 recorded facts from one runtime window. Every fact remains independently traceable in Analyst mode.
What this file did when executed
This file was detonated in 1 sandbox and its runtime behaviour was observed.
Adversary techniques mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
- 162.159.36.2
- \Sessions\1\BaseNamedObjects\DBWinMutex
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 6rule hits recorded
- 0 / 75engines flagged
- 2,261sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
5 high-confidence signature or behavior rules matched this file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceSignature and behavior rulesObserved at - 03
YARAify matched 7 researcher rules to this file.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at - 04
Scanned file: XenoUI.dll — ae6fc5ba07dc314423a518f93b8ad69a5730df780669fd3b40283c32b24a56fc
ProvenanceObservedSourceUploaded fileObserved at - 05
Observed process — "C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\program.exe"
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 06
Observed process — "C:\Users\user\Desktop\software.exe" -install
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 07
Contacted host: 162.159.36.2 — Contact observed during runtime.
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
One or more independent reference databases matched this hash.
Signatures and behavior heuristics
A community signature or high-severity behavioral heuristic matched. Signatures identify known patterns; heuristics are strong leads but are not proof on their own.
- DebuggerCheck__API
- golang_bin_JCorn_CSC846
- NET
- pe_detect_tls_callbacks
- PE_Digital_Certificate
The sample contacted an external IP address directly and no application domain was recorded. Direct-IP traffic also occurs in legitimate installers and infrastructure, so this is supporting context only and requires corroboration from host reputation and other runtime evidence.
Evidence162.159.36.2
0 of 75 engines flagged this file
View all 75 engine results
Section entropy & packers
No high-entropy executable section or known packer signature was detected. Data and resource sections can still have high entropy without indicating packed code.
How widely this file has been seen
Moderate prevalence — neither rare nor common. No strong prior applies.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- XenoUI.dll
- Format
- Win32 EXE
- Code signing
- Signature not verified: Rizve A
- Size
- 164.8 KB
- Last analyzed
- Sep 14, 2026, 2:46 PM UTC
ae6fc5ba07dc314423a518f93b8ad69a5730df780669fd3b40283c32b24a56fcSafety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.
- Recovery step 01
Use it only as part of software obtained from the developer's official site or another source you independently trust.
- Recovery step 02
A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.
- Recovery step 03
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is XenoUI.dll safe?
What is XenoUI.dll?
How many antivirus engines detected XenoUI.dll?
Is XenoUI.dll digitally signed?
What is the SHA-256 hash of XenoUI.dll?
Is it safe to use XenoUI.dll?
How up to date is this analysis of XenoUI.dll?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.