File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is rsclient. exe safe? Yes, no threats found.
Only 3 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it raised generic less reliable alerts, while all 17 reporting major antivirus engines and the completed sandbox supplied no…
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Run it only if it came from the developer's own website or an official app store.
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
3 of 71 flagged
- Flagged 3
- No detection 68
- No result 4
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen 5mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
3 points against it and 5 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
The three detections come exclusively from less reliable engines and use generic labels, while all 17 reporting major antivirus engines remained silent. One completed sandbox observed only routine system-information discovery, with no offensive techniques, malicious sandbox conclusion, dropped files, or network contacts recorded.
Only 3 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable, and all three detections came from less reliable engines using generic or machine-learning labels. All 17 reporting major antivirus engines, including BitDefender, Kaspersky, ESET-NOD32, and Fortinet, did not detect it. One completed sandbox observed system-information discovery, but no offensive techniques or malicious sandbox conclusion. No packer, high-entropy code, dropped files, or external-intelligence matches were found. The executable is unsigned, and no complete contacted-host reputation result is available, so ordinary source verification remains appropriate.
What We Detected
Only 3 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the sample: Bkav, Cylance, and Trapmine. Each is classified as less reliable here, and their labels are generic rather than identifying a consistent malware family. All 17 reporting major antivirus engines, including BitDefender, Kaspersky, ESET-NOD32, Avast, and Fortinet, did not detect the file.
Threat Behavior
One completed sandbox run observed only T1082, a common system-information discovery action. It recorded no offensive techniques, malicious sandbox conclusion, persistence indicators, written files, dropped hashes, or network contacts. Static PE analysis also found no packer, likely packing, or high-entropy code. No complete contacted-host reputation cross-check is available, but the sandbox contact lists themselves were empty.
What To Do Now
The pattern strongly favors generic false alarms from less reliable engines. Because the executable is unsigned, obtain it from its expected official source, verify its SHA-256 value when the publisher provides one, and keep security software enabled while using it.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- The file is unsigned for an executable where code signing applies to this file type, so no publisher identity or certificate history supports the file.
- Bkav reported W32.Malware.86F697FF, Cylance reported Unsafe, and Trapmine reported malicious.high.ml.score, although all are less reliable generic detections.
- The missing contacted-host reputation result means no complete host-reputation cross-check is available, though the completed sandbox recorded no contacted domains, IPs, or URLs.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- All 17 reporting major antivirus engines did not detect the sample
- No offensive MITRE techniques or malicious sandbox conclusion
- No dropped files, persistence indicators, or recorded network contacts
- No packing or high-entropy code indicators
- No MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, or YARAify match
- Unsigned Win32 executable with no verified publisher identity
- Three generic less reliable antivirus detections
- No complete contacted-host reputation cross-check was saved
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 1sandbox rule tag
- 2spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 0filesystem & mutex artifacts
What this file did when executed
This file was run in a sandbox and its runtime behaviour was observed.
Techniques observed in the sandbox
1MITRE ATT&CK techniques the sandbox mapped. Highlighted ones are rare in normal software; the others are common in legitimate programs too.
- T1082· System recon
Observed activity
Processes started
2Programs the file ran, with their command lines.
rsclient.exe"C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\rsclient.exe"rsclient.exe"C:\Users\user\Desktop\rsclient.exe"
Chapter 04
Technical details
3 of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 3
The saved verdict treats these detections as likely false positives.
- BkavW32.Malware.86F697FF
- CylanceUnsafe
- Trapminemalicious.high.ml.score
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Sep 10, 2026, 5:44 AM UTC
- SHA-256
ae9a52149ba2f61465fcd2b06c6b64ec174375585481494d13c3aa33c52a8dd1- SHA-1
2e37212ea5b8c618ccffaac8a7ededecdf572bbe- MD5
c5efb33936341406d46c0ff4369f217a
About this file
rsclient.exe is a Win32 EXE file of 65.5 kB.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 65.5 kB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- May 3, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 453 distinct sources
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 4.82 of 8
First scanned
Antivirus consensus
3 of 71 engines flagged this file
4 of the 75 engines returned no result for this file (file type not supported, or the scan did not finish), so they did not check it.
- Tier-118 engines0flagged
- Tier-236 engines0flagged
- Low-trust17 engines3flagged
View all 75 engine results
- BkavMalicious: W32.Malware.86F697FF
- CylanceMalicious: Unsafe
- TrapmineMalicious: malicious.high.ml.score
- AcronisClean
- AhnLab-V3Clean
- AlibabaClean
- alibabacloudClean
- ALYacClean
- Antiy-AVLClean
- APEXClean
- ArcabitClean
- AvastClean
- Avast-MobileNo result
- AVGClean
- AviraClean
- BitDefenderClean
- BitDefenderFalxNo result
- CAT-QuickHealClean
- ClamAVClean
- CMCClean
- CrowdStrikeClean
- CTXClean
- CynetClean
- DeepInstinctClean
- DrWebClean
- ElasticClean
- EmsisoftClean
- ESET-NOD32Clean
- F-SecureClean
- FortinetClean
- GDataClean
- GoogleClean
- GridinsoftClean
- huorongClean
- IkarusClean
- JiangminClean
- K7AntiVirusClean
- K7GWClean
- KasperskyClean
- KingsoftClean
- LionicClean
- MalwarebytesClean
- MaxSecureClean
- McAfeeDClean
- MicrosoftClean
- MicroWorld-eScanClean
- NANO-AntivirusClean
- PaloaltoClean
- PandaClean
- RisingClean
- SangforClean
- SentinelOneClean
- SkyhighClean
- SophosClean
- SUPERAntiSpywareClean
- SymantecClean
- SymantecMobileInsightNo result
- TACHYONClean
- tehtrisClean
- TencentClean
- TrellixENSClean
- TrendMicroClean
- TrendMicro-HouseCallClean
- TrustlookNo result
- VaristClean
- VBA32Clean
- VIPREClean
- VirITClean
- ViRobotClean
- WebrootClean
- XcitiumClean
- YandexClean
- ZillyaClean
- ZoneAlarmClean
- ZonerClean
Section entropy & packers
No high-entropy executable section or known packer signature was detected. Data and resource sections can still have high entropy without indicating packed code.
How widely this file has been seen
Widely uploaded, but first seen within the last six months. No strong prior applies.
Chapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is rsclient.exe safe?
What is rsclient.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected rsclient.exe?
What is the SHA-256 hash of rsclient.exe?
Is it safe to run rsclient.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of rsclient.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.