File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is IDM_
No engine among 75 flagged this ZIP, and threat-intelligence checks found no matches, though its short history (seen shortly before Sep 10, 2026) and absent data from the test…
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
Keep security protection enabled and scan the extracted files before use. Obtain the archive from its official source and avoid running unexpected executables, scripts, or shortcuts.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Open it only if you trust the person or website you got it from.
Keep your security software and system updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
0 of 35 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 35
- No result 40
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Not run
- First seen 1mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
5 points against it and 4 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
The archive produced no malicious or suspicious detections across 75 engines, including no major alerts, and external intelligence supplied no corroborating threat indicators. Because it was first observed on Sep 10, 2026 and no sandbox run examined its contents, extract and inspect it with protection enabled before opening anything inside.
No engine among 75 identified the ZIP as malicious or suspicious, and three major antivirus engines returned undetected results. Malware-family consensus is absent, and the available researcher intelligence checks produced no matches or YARA rules. However, the archive has only one submission from one source, so it lacks an established reputation. No completed observation from the test run is available, and contacted-host reputation was not checked or saved. The five prior favorable decisions involve only the broad ZIP file type and therefore add little sample-specific assurance.
What We Detected
None of the 35 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the archive as malicious or suspicious, and engines.tier1Malicious was zero. MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, and YARAify supplied no matching threat intelligence, while no engine proposed a malware family.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox observation is available because behaviour is null. The contents were therefore not observed executing, and contactedHosts is also null, so no complete host-reputation result is available.
What To Do Now
The archive is and has almost no reputation history. Keep security software enabled, scan the extracted contents, and verify that the download came from the expected official source before opening any executable, script, or shortcut inside.
Where this verdict could be wrong4 caveats
- The file is from one source, so the 0/35 detection result has little historical reputation behind it.
- The absence of a completed sandbox run means the archive and any contents were not observed running.
- The missing contacted-host reputation result means no complete host-reputation result is available.
- Twenty-nine engines timed out, including Avast, BitDefender, ESET-NOD32, Fortinet, Kaspersky, and GData.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/35 engines reported malicious or suspicious results
- No major antivirus engines flagged it
- The hash is not listed in the MalwareBazaar malware database
- No community YARA rule matched
- First observed on Sep 10, 2026 with only one source and one submission
- No completed sandbox execution
- No contacted-host reputation cross-check
- Twenty-nine engine timeouts reduced effective coverage
- Portable-style ZIP contents were not individually characterized
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
Technical details
None of the 35 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Sep 10, 2026, 12:17 PM UTC
- SHA-256
afe795616a5aeb4ad935b71156b41a07a94d0c03ad8126c40cc518691ef786a2- SHA-1
ca233af33a6758af7c728304f078e84a87cb4bf2- MD5
510997ff969595b4398324384436ac35
About this file
IDM_SCHEDULER_v.2.4.3.zip is a ZIP file of 62.7 MB.
- Type and size
- ZIP · 62.7 MB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Sep 10, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 1 sourceRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
First scanned
Antivirus consensus
0 of 35 engines flagged this file
40 of the 75 engines returned no result for this file (file type not supported, or the scan did not finish), so they did not check it.
- Tier-13 engines0flagged
- Tier-223 engines0flagged
- Low-trust9 engines0flagged
View all 75 engine results
- AcronisNo result
- AhnLab-V3Clean
- AlibabaClean
- alibabacloudClean
- ALYacNo result
- Antiy-AVLClean
- APEXNo result
- ArcabitNo result
- AvastNo result
- Avast-MobileClean
- AVGNo result
- AviraClean
- BitDefenderNo result
- BitDefenderFalxNo result
- BkavNo result
- CAT-QuickHealNo result
- ClamAVClean
- CMCClean
- CrowdStrikeClean
- CTXNo result
- CylanceClean
- CynetClean
- DeepInstinctNo result
- DrWebNo result
- ElasticNo result
- EmsisoftNo result
- ESET-NOD32No result
- F-SecureNo result
- FortinetNo result
- GDataNo result
- GoogleNo result
- GridinsoftClean
- huorongClean
- IkarusNo result
- JiangminNo result
- K7AntiVirusClean
- K7GWClean
- KasperskyNo result
- KingsoftClean
- LionicClean
- MalwarebytesClean
- MaxSecureClean
- McAfeeDClean
- MicrosoftClean
- MicroWorld-eScanClean
- NANO-AntivirusNo result
- PaloaltoNo result
- PandaNo result
- RisingNo result
- SangforClean
- SentinelOneClean
- SkyhighNo result
- SophosNo result
- SUPERAntiSpywareClean
- SymantecClean
- SymantecMobileInsightNo result
- TACHYONClean
- tehtrisNo result
- TencentClean
- TrapmineNo result
- TrellixENSNo result
- TrendMicroNo result
- TrendMicro-HouseCallNo result
- TrustlookClean
- VaristNo result
- VBA32No result
- VIPREClean
- VirITClean
- ViRobotClean
- WebrootClean
- XcitiumNo result
- YandexNo result
- ZillyaNo result
- ZoneAlarmClean
- ZonerClean
How widely this file has been seen
Rarely uploaded, and first seen more than two weeks ago. Often niche legitimate software or internal tooling; not a strong malware signal on its own.
Chapter 04
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is IDM_SCHEDULER_v.2.4.3.zip safe?
What is IDM_SCHEDULER_v.2.4.3.zip?
How many antivirus engines detected IDM_SCHEDULER_v.2.4.3.zip?
What is the SHA-256 hash of IDM_SCHEDULER_v.2.4.3.zip?
Is it safe to open or extract IDM_SCHEDULER_v.2.4.3.zip?
How up to date is this analysis of IDM_SCHEDULER_v.2.4.3.zip?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.