Is PDF_31MDKF_20261008_9577.ZIP safe?
ESET identifies a Trojan downloader and two K7 engines concur, but limited detection agreement and absent runtime evidence prevent firm family attribution.
Three of 75 engines flagged this newly observed ZIP, including ESET-NOD32 with a TrojanDownloader label. The signal warrants caution, but most tier-1 engines did not detect it, and no completed sandbox or host-reputation evidence is available.
b0cbe6043ad9e9cdbd…54444b822b7956Recommended next actions
Before opening or extracting
Do not open or extract it until the source can be verified independently.
If you already opened or extracted it
Stop using it, scan the device, and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts. Get a fresh copy from the original trusted source and verify its exact hash when possible.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
Three of 75 engines flagged this newly observed ZIP, including ESET-NOD32 with a TrojanDownloader label. The signal warrants caution, but most tier-1 engines did not detect it, and no completed sandbox or host-reputation evidence is available.
ESET-NOD32 identified Win32/TrojanDownloader.Agent.IRT, while K7AntiVirus and K7GW supplied generic Trojan detections. That gives the archive one tier-1 detection and limited tier-2 corroboration, but not a strong family consensus. The file has only one recorded submission and no established reputation, increasing uncertainty around a document-themed archive. No completed runtime observation is available, and contacted-host reputation was not checked or saved. With most tier-1 engines silent and no external or historical corroboration, the evidence supports isolation and further inspection rather than definitive family attribution.
What We Detected
Three of 75 antivirus engines flagged the ZIP archive. ESET-NOD32 identified Win32/TrojanDownloader.Agent.IRT, while K7AntiVirus and K7GW used the generic Trojan label 006e60631. Only one tier-1 engine supplied the downloader attribution, so there is no strong family consensus.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox observation is available, so execution, persistence, payload retrieval, and command-and-control activity were not observed. The contacted-host reputation check was also unavailable. The archive is newly observed, with one submitter and one submission, leaving little reputation history.
What To Do Now
Do not extract or open the archive on a production system. Keep endpoint protection enabled, verify the sender and expected document through an independent channel, and submit the archive or its extracted contents for controlled sandbox analysis before use.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- Only 3/75 engines detected the file, while 16 tier1 engines reported no detection.
- externalIntel.circl.hit=false, but MalwareBazaar and YARAify coverage was skipped, so external corroboration is incomplete.
- The two K7 detections use the same label and may not represent fully independent corroboration.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- Only 3/75 engines detected the archive.
- 16 tier1 engines reported no detection.
- engines.tier1FamilyConsensus.strong=false.
- No malicious dropped child is reported.
- No brand mismatch or adversarial text contamination was detected.
- ESET-NOD32 reports Win32/TrojanDownloader.Agent.IRT.
- K7AntiVirus and K7GW report Trojan 006e60631.
- The archive has only one recorded submission and no established reputation.
- The PDF-themed ZIP filename could be used to entice document execution.
- No completed runtime evidence is available.
- No complete contacted-host reputation result is available.
Quarantine the archive and avoid extracting it until its source is independently verified and the contents receive controlled runtime analysis. Keep endpoint protection enabled.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete3 of 75 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
PartialIndependent reference checks were attempted but are incomplete.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 3 / 75engines flagged
- 1sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
3 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file, including ESET-NOD32 and K7AntiVirus.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
The hash has been submitted 1 time from 1 source.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
Category: downloader
Available reference checks returned no match, but at least one source was unavailable. This is not a clean result.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
3 of 75 engines flagged this file
View all 75 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Barely seen in the wild and first surfaced recently. 3 antivirus detections make that low prevalence materially relevant, but rarity alone is not proof of malware.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- PDF_31MDKF_20261008_9577.ZIP
- Format
- ZIP
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 288.1 KB
- Last analyzed
- Oct 8, 2026, 8:20 AM UTC
b0cbe6043ad9e9cdbd92ce93168b9efb7c9382d465ae9b5e7f54444b822b7956Safety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
We couldn't fully clear this file. Treat it with caution.
- Recovery step 01
Don't open or extract it unless you're certain it came from a source you trust.
- Recovery step 02
Check where you got it — an unexpected attachment or a random download link is a red flag.
- Recovery step 03
If its origin cannot be confirmed, delete this archive and use a fresh copy from a trusted source. Get a fresh copy from the original trusted source and verify its exact hash when possible.
- Recovery step 04
If you're still unsure, scan it again in a day or two — detections often catch up on newer files.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is PDF_31MDKF_20261008_9577.ZIP safe, or is it malware?
What is PDF_31MDKF_20261008_9577.ZIP?
How many antivirus engines detected PDF_31MDKF_20261008_9577.ZIP?
I already downloaded and opened or extracted PDF_31MDKF_20261008_9577.ZIP — what should I do?
How do I remove PDF_31MDKF_20261008_9577.ZIP?
What kind of malware is PDF_31MDKF_20261008_9577.ZIP?
What is the SHA-256 hash of PDF_31MDKF_20261008_9577.ZIP?
How up to date is this analysis of PDF_31MDKF_20261008_9577.ZIP?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.