Is Empire_Of_Lust_[Final]_[Carnality_INC]_-_Archive_win_607739.zip safe?
One tier-1 engine identified a Python trojan, but 74 of 75 engines did not flag it and no independent evidence confirms that finding.
ESET-NOD32 detected Python/Agent.BVZ, while the other 74 of 75 engines did not flag the archive and no family consensus formed. Because the file is newly observed and has no completed runtime analysis, the isolated detection remains unresolved; avoid opening it until its source or contents can be independently verified.
b1b88c1fbc811ad7da…7806c11e2cd8d9Recommended next actions
Before opening or extracting
Do not open or extract it until the source can be verified independently.
If you already opened or extracted it
Stop using it, scan the device, and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts. Get a fresh copy from the original trusted source and verify its exact hash when possible.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
ESET-NOD32 detected Python/Agent.BVZ, while the other 74 of 75 engines did not flag the archive and no family consensus formed. Because the file is newly observed and has no completed runtime analysis, the isolated detection remains unresolved; avoid opening it until its source or contents can be independently verified.
The archive received one detection among 75 engines, and that detection came from tier-1 engine ESET-NOD32 with a Python/Agent.BVZ label. However, 16 other tier-1 engines reported no detection, and there is no tier-1 family consensus. The file has only one recorded submission and was first observed recently, so reputation evidence is not mature enough to settle the conflict. No completed sandbox observation, malicious dropped-child result, similar-file history, or researcher-rule match is available. The evidence therefore supports caution without establishing a confirmed malware family.
What We Detected
ESET-NOD32 was the only engine among 75 to flag the archive, reporting Python/Agent.BVZ. Sixteen other tier-1 engines, including BitDefender, Kaspersky, Fortinet, Avast, and Avira, did not reproduce the detection, and no tier-1 family consensus formed.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox run is available, so execution behavior was not observed. The contacted-host reputation check was also unavailable, and there is no malicious dropped-child finding. Researcher intelligence produced no YARAify or MalwareBazaar match, though those absences cannot prove a newly observed file is benign.
What To Do Now
Do not open or extract the archive on a primary system until its source and contents are verified. Keep endpoint protection enabled, obtain the file from a trusted official source if possible, and rescan it after additional engine coverage or controlled sandbox results become available.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- ESET-NOD32 is a tier-1 engine and specifically identified Python/Agent.BVZ, so its isolated detection should not be dismissed outright.
- Sixteen other tier-1 engines reported no detection, including BitDefender, Kaspersky, Fortinet, Avast, and Avira.
- No external-intelligence hit was found, although absence of a match does not establish that a newly submitted archive is benign.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- Only 1/75 engines reported a detection.
- Sixteen tier-1 engines reported no detection.
- engines.tier1FamilyConsensus.strong=false.
- externalIntel.yaraify.ruleCount=0 and externalIntel.malwareBazaar.hit=false.
- brandMismatch.detected was not reported.
- ESET-NOD32 identified Python/Agent.BVZ.
- The archive is newly observed with only one recorded submission.
- The ZIP contains a PE file according to file.tags.
- No completed runtime analysis is available.
- No complete contacted-host reputation result is available.
Avoid opening the archive until its origin is verified or further analysis resolves the isolated detection. Keep security protection enabled and use a controlled sandbox if examination is necessary.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete1 of 75 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 1 / 75engines flagged
- 1sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
1 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file, including ESET-NOD32.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
The hash has been submitted 1 time from 1 source.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
1 of 75 engines flagged this file
View all 75 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Barely seen in the wild and first surfaced recently. 1 antivirus detection make that low prevalence materially relevant, but rarity alone is not proof of malware.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- Empire_Of_Lust_[Final]_[Carnality_INC]_-_Archive_win_607739.zip
- Format
- ZIP
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 36.0 MB
- Last analyzed
- Sep 11, 2026, 1:03 PM UTC
b1b88c1fbc811ad7dafe2a40e98bd06e7fc1b77c18b5e0674e7806c11e2cd8d9Safety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
We couldn't fully clear this file. Treat it with caution.
- Recovery step 01
Don't open or extract it unless you're certain it came from a source you trust.
- Recovery step 02
Check where you got it — an unexpected attachment or a random download link is a red flag.
- Recovery step 03
If its origin cannot be confirmed, delete this archive and use a fresh copy from a trusted source. Get a fresh copy from the original trusted source and verify its exact hash when possible.
- Recovery step 04
If you're still unsure, scan it again in a day or two — detections often catch up on newer files.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is this file safe, or is it malware?
What is this file?
How many antivirus engines detected this file?
What should I do if I already opened or extracted this file?
How do I remove this file?
What is the SHA-256 hash of this file?
How up to date is this analysis of this file?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.