MalwareTips

File scan report

Scan another file

Verdict Suspicious

Analyzed , 2 days ago

Is Bloomclient-crackedby648k.exe.jar safe? Treat it as suspicious.

No antivirus engine detected the JAR, but conflicting sandbox labels and its cracked-tool presentation leave its intent and safety unresolved.

Read the whole reasonShow less

Why Suspicious? One sandbox test run rated it malicious while another found nothing; nothing else confirms it.

Limited evidence · One sign points to a problem; nothing else confirms it.

Don't open or run it until you know where it came from

If it came from a link, an attachment or a stranger, delete it.

What to do now4 steps

Some signs point to a problem, but nothing confirms it is harmful. Treat it with caution.

What to do

  1. Don't open or run it unless you're sure where it came from.

  2. Check where you got it: an unexpected attachment, a link someone sent you or a re-upload is a red flag.

  3. If you can't confirm where it came from, delete it. If you need the program, download it again from the publisher's own website.

If you already opened or ran it

  1. Stop using it, run a full scan with your antivirus and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts.

Not sure what to do?

Ask the MalwareTips community before you run it. If you already ran it, follow the cleanup guide.

Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.

Why we think so

Share this file report

Bloomclient-crackedby648k.exe.jar: Suspicious — MalwareTips file scan

The link always shows the latest result for this exact file (its SHA-256 fingerprint).

Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.

Antivirus results

0 of 63 flagged

  • Flagged 0
  • No detection 63
  • No result 12
FileBloomclient-crackedby648k.exe.jar2.1 MBSHA-256 b56fdb0fdb73…ceeef9
  • Code signing Not applicable
  • Test run Completed
  • First seen 9d ago
A sandbox test run rated its behaviour as malicious.

Chapter 02

Why we think so

4 points against it and 3 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.

MT AI Engine · Verdict analysis

The reasoning behind this verdict

Analyst conclusion

None of the 63 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file, and no malware-specific rules, malicious files it created, or public sample-database entries corroborate the hostile sandbox label. However, the sandbox evidence conflicts, with one combined label indicating malware or a trojan and another indicating clean activity, so the file should not be trusted without further verification.

Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
  • A combined sandbox label identified malware or trojan activity, although it conflicts with a clean combined label.
  • The file name presents the archive as a cracked client, an untrusted distribution context that deserves caution.
  • No complete reputation result is available for contacted hosts, although the only recorded address was identified as analysis-environment background traffic.

These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.

6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source

Chapter 03

What it did in our test

It ran in 4 isolated tests; 1 test environment rated what it did as risky.

Test run summary

Capture complete
  • 4isolated sandbox runs
  • 16sandbox rule tags
  • 4spawned processes
  • 0network contacts
  • 15filesystem & mutex artifacts

What the test run showed

What the file did on a test computer

Confirmed in the test run

  • Moderate concern: Contains packed or scrambled code that is harder to inspect (common in installers too).

  • Moderate concern: Ran commands or a script on the test computer.

  • Moderate concern: Hid files or windows on the test computer.

  • Note: Read basic details of the test computer, such as its Windows version.

  • Note: Loaded extra code modules while running.

  • Note: Checked which security software was installed on the test computer.

Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)

  • Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as code injection, but no injected program was recorded.

  • Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as downloading a file, but no download was recorded.

  • Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as creating a service; no new service was recorded.

  • Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as changing how Windows loads code; nothing confirms it.

This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.

Recorded behavior

What happened in the test

Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.

Seen in the test runWorked out from other results

  1. Input file

    The submitted object

    1
    1. Evidence 1 of 5: FileSeen in the test run

      Bloomclient-crackedby648k.exe.jar

      b56fdb0fdb73f4d481fe9ff80524cf2fe50bec7322385eaa5472179bedceeef9

      Uploaded file

  2. Processes

    What ran

    2
    1. Evidence 2 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run

      javaw.exe

      "C:\Program Files\Java\jre-1.8\bin\javaw.exe" -jar "C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\runtime.jar"

      Test run
    2. Evidence 3 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run

      cmd.exe

      C:\Windows\SysWOW64\cmd.exe C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe /c ""C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.8.0_441\bin\java.exe" -jar "C:\Users\user\Desktop\sample.jar""

      Test run
    3. +1 more recorded observation

  3. Files

    Created or changed

    2
    1. Evidence 4 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run

      2668

      C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_<USER>\2668

      Test run
    2. Evidence 5 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run

      3903daac9bc4a3b7.timestamp

      C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\.oracle_jre_usage\3903daac9bc4a3b7.timestamp

      Test run
    3. +1 more recorded observation

5 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.

Chapter 04

Technical details

None of the 63 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.

Sources checked

Every check behind this verdict

6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.

SourceStatusResultChecked
Antivirus enginesVirusTotal · 75 enginesCompletePositive signal: 0 of 63 engines flagged it · 12 gave no result Details for antivirus engines
Sandbox runVirusTotal sandboxes · C2AE, CAPE Sandbox, ZenboxCompleteWorth noting: 4 runs: 1 malicious, 1 clean, 2 without a verdict Details for sandbox run
Contacted hostsMalwareTips URL scannerNot neededThe sandbox recorded no contacted hosts to checkNo date recorded
Signature rulesYARAify community rules + MalwareTips rulesComplete1 MalwareTips behaviour rule Details for signature rules
Malware sample databaseabuse.ch MalwareBazaarCompleteNot listed
Known-software referenceCIRCL hashlookupCompleteNo match

File fingerprint

Last analyzed
Oct 24, 2026, 8:45 AM UTC
SHA-256
b56fdb0fdb73f4d481fe9ff80524cf2fe50bec7322385eaa5472179bedceeef9
SHA-1
7197088de39976dd986eab6e298b0326e0044309
MD5
7ab5bf1922cbe8555b9050195a5269d2

About this file

Bloomclient-crackedby648k.exe.jar is a JAR file of 2.1 MB.

Type and size
JAR · 2.1 MB
Signer
Not applicable
First seen
Oct 17, 2026On VirusTotal.
Submitted by
79 distinct sources

First scanned

Chapter 05

Questions & answers

Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.

Is Bloomclient-crackedby648k.exe.jar safe, or is it malware?
Bloomclient-crackedby648k.exe.jar is rated Suspicious: some signs point to a problem, but nothing confirms it is harmful. No antivirus engine flags it; the caution comes from other evidence, such as who made it, how widely it is used or what it did in a test run. Don't open or run it unless you're sure where it came from. If you need it, download it again from the project's own website.
What is Bloomclient-crackedby648k.exe.jar?
Bloomclient-crackedby648k.exe.jar is a Java program (JAR), about 2.1 MB. VirusTotal first saw it on Oct 17, 2026.
How many antivirus engines detected Bloomclient-crackedby648k.exe.jar?
None of the 63 antivirus engines that checked it flag Bloomclient-crackedby648k.exe.jar. A clean antivirus result is not proof of safety; the caution comes from other evidence, such as who made it, how widely it is used or what it did in a test run.
What should I do if I already opened or ran Bloomclient-crackedby648k.exe.jar?
No infection is confirmed: the rating is a caution, not a malware finding. 1) Check where it came from. If you can't confirm the source, delete it. 2) Run a full scan with your security software. 3) If the scan finds something, follow its removal steps and change passwords you typed on the device since then.
What is the SHA-256 hash of Bloomclient-crackedby648k.exe.jar?
The SHA-256 fingerprint of Bloomclient-crackedby648k.exe.jar is b56fdb0fdb73f4d481fe9ff80524cf2fe50bec7322385eaa5472179bedceeef9, and its MD5 is 7ab5bf1922cbe8555b9050195a5269d2. Two files with the same SHA-256 are identical, so use it to check you have exactly this file, not just one with the same name.
How up to date is this analysis of Bloomclient-crackedby648k.exe.jar?
This report reflects the scan on Oct 24, 2026. A file's fingerprint never changes, but antivirus engines keep learning, so a rating can change later. To get a newer result, scan the file again: we refresh the antivirus results when the saved ones are out of date.
Chapter 06

Community

Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.

Scan another
Check a different file
URL instead?
Check if a link is safe
This report and its SHA-256 fingerprint are public, so the next person who checks the same file gets an instant answer; documents and images are listed by type instead of their file name. A file we had not seen before is uploaded to VirusTotal, whose security partners and subscribers can download it; MalwareTips deletes its own copy after the scan. If you ran this file and are worried, scan your device with up-to-date security software.