File scan report
Verdict Suspicious
Is Lua Tools- win- Portable. zip safe? Treat it as suspicious.
ZIP archive containing Java executables flagged by four engines with no major consensus and no malicious files it created.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Why Suspicious? 4 antivirus engines flag it, but no major engine agrees; nothing else confirms it.
Limited evidence · One sign points to a problem; nothing else confirms it.
If it came from a link, an attachment or a stranger, delete it.
What to do now4 steps
Some signs point to a problem, but nothing confirms it is harmful. Treat it with caution.
What to do
Don't open or extract it unless you're sure where it came from.
Check where you got it: an unexpected attachment, a link someone sent you or a re-upload is a red flag.
If you can't confirm where it came from, delete it. If you need the program, download it again from the publisher's own website.
If you already opened or extracted it
Stop using it, run a full scan with your antivirus and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts.
Not sure what to do?
Ask the MalwareTips community before you run it. If you already ran it, follow the cleanup guide.
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
4 of 67 flagged
- Flagged 4
- No detection 63
- No result 8
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Completed
- First seen 1mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
2 points against it and 3 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
Four of the 67 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the archive, all smaller or less reliable, with labels such as RiskWare.SteamHack and Trojan.Win32.Save.a.
The absence of major detections and the lack of any confirmed malicious child or external-intel corroboration keep the file out of the malicious category. However, the presence of offensive MITRE technique T1543.002. No complete contacted-host reputation result was available. The file is widely seen but new, portable-looking, and only five days old, so its reputation is still forming.
What We Detected
Four engines (DeepInstinct, Malwarebytes, Sangfor, MaxSecure) returned malicious labels; none are major. The archive contains Java JARs that executed under Java 8 and contacted IP 162.159.36.2 without an associated domain.
Threat Behavior
Observed MITRE technique T1543.002 (new service creation) is listed as offensive, yet sandbox verdicts were empty and no file it created was flagged malicious. No YARA, CIRCL or MalwareBazaar hits exist.
What To Do Now
Do not run the archive on production systems. Keep security software enabled and monitor for any follow-up submissions that might add major detections or malicious child verdicts.
- No malicious detections from major antivirus engines
- No malicious files it created
- No external-intel hits
- Offensive MITRE technique observed
- Less reliable engine detections present
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 2sandbox rule tags
- 3spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 6filesystem & mutex artifacts
What the test run showed
What the file did on a test computer
Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as creating a service; no new service was recorded.
This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.
Recorded behavior
What happened in the test
Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.
- 1
Input file
The submitted object
- Evidence 1 of 5: FileSeen in the test run
LuaTools-win-Portable.zip
b7b42b3e20a7f1b8c0a0173b294112e99f76510b2c82cf5db47d0efbe6cabccb
Uploaded file
- 2
Processes
What ran
- Evidence 2 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
javaw.exe
"C:\Program Files\Java\jre-1.8\bin\javaw.exe" -jar "C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\runtime.jar"
Test run - Evidence 3 of 5: ProcessSeen in the test run
cmd.exe
C:\Windows\SysWOW64\cmd.exe C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe /c ""C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.8.0_441\bin\java.exe" -jar "C:\Users\user\Desktop\download.jar""
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Files
Created or changed
- Evidence 4 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
ConDrv
\Device\ConDrv
Test run - Evidence 5 of 5: Written fileSeen in the test run
Connect
\Device\ConDrv\\Connect
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
5 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.
What this file did when executed
This file was run in a sandbox and its runtime behaviour was observed.
Techniques observed in the sandbox
2MITRE ATT&CK techniques the sandbox mapped. Highlighted ones are rare in normal software; the others are common in legitimate programs too.
- T1064
- T1543.002· Service install
Observed activity
Processes started
3Programs the file ran, with their command lines.
javaw.exe"C:\Program Files\Java\jre-1.8\bin\javaw.exe" -jar "C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\runtime.jar"cmd.exeC:\Windows\SysWOW64\cmd.exe C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe /c ""C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.8.0_441\bin\java.exe" -jar "C:\Users\user\Desktop\download.jar""java.exe"C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.8.0_441\bin\java.exe" -jar "C:\Users\user\Desktop\download.jar"
Files
6Files the file created, changed or deleted.
- Written
\Device\ConDrv - Written
\Device\ConDrv\\Connect - Written
/var/log/auth.log.1.gz - Written
/var/log/dpkg.log.1.gz - Written
/var/log/kern.log.1.gz - Written
/var/log/syslog.1.gz
Sandbox background — not the file
13The analysis machine's own processes and connections, recorded in every run.
- VM process
conhost.exeC:\Windows\System32\conhost.exe C:\Windows\system32\conhost.exe 0xffffffff -ForceV1 - VM process
gzip/bin/gzip - VM process
sh/bin/sh sh -c "\n\t\tinvoke-rc.d --quiet cups restart > /dev/null\n" logrotate_script "/var/log/cups/*log " - VM process
invoke-rc.d/usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d invoke-rc.d --quiet cups restart - VM process
runlevel/sbin/runlevel - VM process
systemctl/usr/bin/systemctl systemctl --quiet is-enabled cups.service
Show all 13 entries for sandbox background — not the file
- VM process
ls/usr/bin/ls ls /etc/rc[S2345].d/S[0-9][0-9]cups - VM process
systemctl/usr/bin/systemctl systemctl --quiet is-active cups.service - VM process
sh/bin/sh sh -c /usr/lib/rsyslog/rsyslog-rotate logrotate_script /var/log/syslog - VM process
rsyslog-rotate/usr/lib/rsyslog/rsyslog-rotate - VM process
systemctl/usr/bin/systemctl systemctl kill -s HUP rsyslog.service - VM process
sh/bin/sh sh -c /usr/lib/rsyslog/rsyslog-rotate logrotate_script /var/log/mail.info/var/log/mail.warn/var/log/mail.err/var/log/mail.log/var/log/daemon.log/var/log/kern.log/var/log/auth.log/var/log/user.log/var/log/lpr.log/var/log/cron.log/var/log/debug/var/log/messages - VM host
162.159.36.2
Chapter 04
Technical details
4 of the 67 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 4
- DeepInstinctMALICIOUS
- MalwarebytesRiskWare.SteamHack
- MaxSecureTrojan.Malware.300983.susgen
- SangforTrojan.Win32.Save.a
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Sep 3, 2026, 7:34 PM UTC
- SHA-256
b7b42b3e20a7f1b8c0a0173b294112e99f76510b2c82cf5db47d0efbe6cabccb- SHA-1
0a89381bf2b122ecd30a7aa5d1e487f9e9ca1108- MD5
e160007b722aa8bc3617b7dd655d9dcb
About this file
LuaTools-win-Portable.zip is a ZIP file of 7.3 MB.
- Type and size
- ZIP · 7.3 MB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Aug 30, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 140 distinct sources
First scanned
Antivirus consensus
4 of 67 engines flagged this file
8 of the 75 engines returned no result for this file (file type not supported, or the scan did not finish), so they did not check it.
- Tier-117 engines0flagged
- Tier-237 engines3flagged
- Low-trust13 engines1flagged
View all 75 engine results
- DeepInstinctMalicious: MALICIOUS
- MalwarebytesMalicious: RiskWare.SteamHack
- MaxSecureMalicious: Trojan.Malware.300983.susgen
- SangforMalicious: Trojan.Win32.Save.a
- AcronisClean
- AhnLab-V3Clean
- AlibabaClean
- alibabacloudClean
- ALYacClean
- Antiy-AVLClean
- APEXNo result
- ArcabitClean
- AvastClean
- Avast-MobileClean
- AVGClean
- AviraClean
- BitDefenderClean
- BitDefenderFalxNo result
- BkavClean
- CAT-QuickHealClean
- ClamAVClean
- CMCClean
- CrowdStrikeClean
- CTXClean
- CylanceNo result
- CynetClean
- DrWebClean
- ElasticClean
- EmsisoftClean
- ESET-NOD32Clean
- F-SecureClean
- FortinetClean
- GDataClean
- GoogleClean
- GridinsoftClean
- huorongClean
- IkarusNo result
- JiangminClean
- K7AntiVirusClean
- K7GWClean
- KasperskyClean
- KingsoftClean
- LionicClean
- McAfeeDClean
- MicrosoftClean
- MicroWorld-eScanClean
- NANO-AntivirusClean
- PaloaltoNo result
- PandaClean
- RisingClean
- SentinelOneClean
- SkyhighClean
- SophosClean
- SUPERAntiSpywareClean
- SymantecClean
- SymantecMobileInsightNo result
- TACHYONClean
- tehtrisNo result
- TencentClean
- TrapmineNo result
- TrellixENSClean
- TrendMicroClean
- TrendMicro-HouseCallClean
- TrustlookClean
- VaristClean
- VBA32Clean
- VIPREClean
- VirITClean
- ViRobotClean
- WebrootClean
- XcitiumClean
- YandexClean
- ZillyaClean
- ZoneAlarmClean
- ZonerClean
How widely this file has been seen
Widely uploaded, but first seen within the last six months. No strong prior applies.
Chapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is LuaTools-win-Portable.zip safe, or is it malware?
What is LuaTools-win-Portable.zip?
How many antivirus engines detected LuaTools-win-Portable.zip?
What should I do if I already opened or extracted LuaTools-win-Portable.zip?
What is the SHA-256 hash of LuaTools-win-Portable.zip?
How up to date is this analysis of LuaTools-win-Portable.zip?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.