File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is Train45.
No antivirus engine detected this widely submitted executable, although an unsigned publisher identity and one runtime mapping justify ordinary caution.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Run it only if it came from the developer's own website or an official app store.
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
0 of 71 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 71
- No result 4
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Completed
- First seen 4mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
3 points against it and 4 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
All 71 antivirus engines that checked it were silent, including 17 major antivirus engines, after nearly 3,000 submissions. One sandbox mapped activity to T1055 Process Injection, but it produced no malicious verdict, and neither packing analysis nor external intelligence corroborated a threat.
The strongest evidence is the complete absence of detections across 75 antivirus engines, with all 17 reporting major antivirus engines silent. The file has also been submitted 2,976 times by 2,533 sources, making sustained non-detection more meaningful than it would be for a sample. One completed sandbox run mapped activity to T1055 Process Injection, but the saved evidence does not establish the exact method or intent, and the sandbox issued no malicious verdict. The antivirus analysis found neither high-entropy code nor likely packing, while MalwareBazaar and YARAify supplied no corroborating intelligence. The executable is unsigned, so its publisher cannot be authenticated and some caution remains appropriate.
What We Detected
None of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the executable, including 17 major antivirus engines. The sample has meaningful exposure—2,533 sources and 2,976 submissions—without accumulating detections. It is unsigned, so no verified publisher identity or historical signer record is available.
Threat Behavior
One completed sandbox run mapped activity to MITRE T1055, Process Injection. That is a material risk indicator, but the available trace does not prove a specific injection mechanism or malicious intent, and the sandbox produced no malicious verdict. No contacted domains, IP addresses, or URLs were recorded; however, no separate host-reputation cross-check was saved. The antivirus analysis found no likely packing or high-entropy code, and external intelligence provided no matching malware family or YARA rules.
What To Do Now
Keep security software enabled and obtain the executable from its expected source. If its origin is uncertain or T1055 activity is unexpected for the program, test it in an isolated environment and verify its hash with the distributor before use.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- The saved runtime mapping includes T1055 Process Injection, an offensive technique that warrants caution even though the sandbox issued no malicious verdict.
- The file is unsigned for this Win32 executable, so there is no verified publisher identity or signer history.
- No contacted-host reputation result was saved, although no network contacts were recorded; no completed host-reputation cross-check is available.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/71 antivirus engines reported a detection
- 2,533 sources submitted the sample 2,976 times
- No malicious sandbox verdict or dropped malicious child
- No likely packing, MalwareBazaar hit, or YARAify rule match
- Unsigned Win32 executable with no verifiable publisher identity
- One sandbox mapped activity to MITRE T1055 Process Injection
- No completed contacted-host reputation cross-check was saved
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 6sandbox rule tags
- 2spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 2filesystem & mutex artifacts
Includes 6 mapped techniques and every process, file, registry and network entry.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
None of the 71 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Sep 9, 2026, 6:48 PM UTC
- SHA-256
bbf72efb2646d3a1c0aba7b4dcb8591ec28b33f7b5f554480a234add0a9f06dc- SHA-1
5800bf2426b8e403f1f92425c13b4d6309cd53e4- MD5
b5ae1b33d164736d0730cb0180d1c5fb
About this file
Train45.console.exe is a Win32 EXE file of 142.3 kB.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 142.3 kB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Jun 26, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 2,533 distinct sources
- Packer
- None detected
- Entropy
- 7.17 of 8
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75), 1 matched signature rule, PE section entropy and packers and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is Train45.console.exe safe?
What is Train45.console.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected Train45.console.exe?
What is the SHA-256 hash of Train45.console.exe?
Is it safe to run Train45.console.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of Train45.console.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.