File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is Child
None of the 60 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this 7 MB package file, no malware reference databases list it, and our static review found nothing hostile inside.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
No action is needed if you expected this package file; keep your security protection enabled as usual. If it arrived unexpectedly, confirm its origin with the sender before opening it, since the file itself has no established track record.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Open it only if you trust the person or website it came from.
Keep your security software and system updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Antivirus results
0 of 60 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 60
- No result 15
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Not run
- First seen Today
Chapter 02
Why we think so
4 points against it and 4 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
No antivirus engine out of 75 detected anything in this file, including the 18 highest-trust vendors, and neither public malware listings nor malware-specific rule sets matched it. Our own review of the uploaded bytes surfaced no macros, scripts, embedded programs or other risky constructs. The remaining uncertainty is that the package format itself could not be identified, so tell us if you were not expecting to receive it.
The scan results are uniformly empty: every one of the 60 engines that analysed the file returned no verdict, and the 18 highest-trust vendors — BitDefender, Kaspersky, ESET-NOD32, Microsoft, Avira and others — all cleared it. Independent lookups in three public malware reference feeds found no listing, no family name and no malware-specific rule match. Our own static review of the uploaded bytes found no macros, scripts, embedded executables, external links or other hostile constructs, and no behaviour rules fired. The one real limitation is that the file's internal format was not identified, which means the engines could only examine it shallowly; that limits what can be positively confirmed about its contents. With no detection, no reference-database entry and no hostile content observed, the evidence points to an ordinary data package rather than anything harmful.
What We Detected
Nothing. All 60 antivirus engines that checked it were asked about this file, 60 returned a result, and none of them flagged it — not even as a low-confidence or generic detection. The highest-trust group behaved the same way: BitDefender, Kaspersky, ESET-NOD32, Microsoft, Avira, Fortinet, G Data, Emsisoft, DrWeb and their peers all reported the file as clean.
Public malware reference feeds were checked and returned nothing: the file is not listed in any sample-sharing database, matched no family signature, and triggered no malware-specific detection rule.
Threat Behavior
There is no behaviour to describe. The file was not executed in a monitoring environment, so no process activity, file drops or network traffic were observed. No complete contacted-host reputation result was available.
Our own review of the uploaded bytes raised no findings: no document macros, no scripts, no shortcut with hidden arguments, no embedded executable, no archive holding a disguised file. The file is roughly 7 MB, was first seen on Nov 7, 2026, and was submitted by a single source, so there is no distribution history to compare it against.
The file is a package-format container and its specific internal structure was not identified during the review. That means the scan engines looked at it with less depth than they would a standard Windows program, which is the main reason this assessment is not stronger than it is.
What To Do Now
Nothing needs to be done if you were expecting this package — for example from a game, an application installer bundle or an asset download. Keep your antivirus and other protection switched on; it gave no cause for concern here.
If the file arrived unexpectedly, from a stranger or alongside a message urging you to open it quickly, treat it with ordinary caution: confirm with the sender through a channel you already trust before opening it, and leave it alone if you cannot establish where it came from.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- The package format could not be identified, so the scan engines had only limited visibility into its contents; a technically clean set of scans is not the same as a positive identification of what the file contains.
- The contacted-host reputation check was not completed and no sandbox execution exists, so nothing is known about any network activity the file might perform if opened.
- A single submitter and a first-seen date of Nov 7, 2026 mean the file has no track record — a missed detection on a rare, opaque container cannot be ruled out by reputation alone.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 60 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file, including all 18 of the highest-trust vendors such as BitDefender, Kaspersky, ESET-NOD32 and Microsoft.
- No public malware database lists this file, and no malware-specific detection rule matched it.
- Our own review of the uploaded bytes found no macros, scripts, embedded programs, links or other risky constructs.
- No behaviour rules fired, and no dropped files or bundled payloads were recorded alongside it.
- The file's internal format was not identified, so the engines could examine its contents only shallowly.
- It is very rare: a single submitter and a first-seen date of Nov 7, 2026, with no established history to check against.
- No publisher signature applies to this file type, so there is no way to confirm who built it.
- No sandbox execution and no host-reputation check were completed, so its behaviour in the test run and any network activity are unknown.
7 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
Technical details
None of the 60 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
No risky structure found
We opened the uploaded file in an isolated sandbox and read its structure without running it.
Checked on Nov 7, 2026 while the file was uploaded. MalwareTips deleted its copy afterwards; VirusTotal keeps the uploaded file.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
7 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Nov 7, 2026, 8:44 AM UTC
- SHA-256
bc11a01972b450c7eae88e086cfa4b35e5c88e4383c8d3a570654d85aef9aaa8- SHA-1
1137d7f8c7afe2d6fcbc0706f942dbef491828c2- MD5
323dfa2c8141e064844f5f06f1dd5ced
About this file
ChildQWERTYMiloHair.package is an unknown file of 7.1 MB.
- Type and size
- unknown · 7.1 MB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Nov 7, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 1 sourceRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
First scanned
Antivirus consensus
0 of 60 engines flagged this file
15 of the 75 engines returned no result for this file (file type not supported, or the scan did not finish), so they did not check it.
- Tier-118 engines0flagged
- Tier-232 engines0flagged
- Low-trust10 engines0flagged
View all 75 engine results
- AcronisClean
- AhnLab-V3Clean
- AlibabaNo result
- alibabacloudClean
- ALYacClean
- Antiy-AVLClean
- APEXNo result
- ArcabitClean
- AvastClean
- Avast-MobileNo result
- AVGClean
- AviraClean
- BitDefenderClean
- BitDefenderFalxNo result
- BkavClean
- CAT-QuickHealClean
- ClamAVClean
- CMCClean
- CrowdStrikeClean
- CTXClean
- CylanceNo result
- CynetClean
- DeepInstinctNo result
- DrWebClean
- ElasticNo result
- EmsisoftClean
- ESET-NOD32Clean
- F-SecureClean
- FortinetClean
- GDataClean
- GoogleClean
- GridinsoftClean
- huorongClean
- IkarusClean
- JiangminClean
- K7AntiVirusClean
- K7GWClean
- KasperskyClean
- KingsoftClean
- LionicClean
- MalwarebytesClean
- MaxSecureNo result
- McAfeeDClean
- MicrosoftClean
- MicroWorld-eScanClean
- NANO-AntivirusClean
- PaloaltoNo result
- PandaClean
- RisingClean
- SangforClean
- SentinelOneNo result
- SkyhighClean
- SophosClean
- SUPERAntiSpywareClean
- SymantecClean
- SymantecMobileInsightNo result
- TACHYONClean
- tehtrisNo result
- TencentClean
- TrapmineNo result
- TrellixENSClean
- TrendMicroClean
- TrendMicro-HouseCallClean
- TrustlookNo result
- VaristClean
- VBA32Clean
- VIPREClean
- VirITClean
- ViRobotClean
- WebrootNo result
- XcitiumClean
- YandexClean
- ZillyaClean
- ZoneAlarmClean
- ZonerClean
How widely this file has been seen
Barely seen in the wild and first surfaced recently. That limits reputation evidence, but rarity alone is not proof of malware.
Chapter 04
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is ChildQWERTYMiloHair.package safe?
What is ChildQWERTYMiloHair.package?
How many antivirus engines detected ChildQWERTYMiloHair.package?
What is the SHA-256 hash of ChildQWERTYMiloHair.package?
Is it safe to open ChildQWERTYMiloHair.package?
How up to date is this analysis of ChildQWERTYMiloHair.package?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.