File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is twilightforest-
None of the 50 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this JAR, while one sandbox returned clean despite several uncorroborated offensive-technique mappings that merit limited…
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
Verify the SHA-256 against the expected mod publisher or trusted distribution channel before installation. Keep security protection enabled and use an isolated game profile if the source cannot be independently confirmed.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Run it only if it came from the project's own website.
Keep your security software and system updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Antivirus results
0 of 50 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 50
- No result 25
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Completed
- First seen 2mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
4 points against it and 4 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
None of the 50 antivirus engines that checked it detected malware, including the reporting major antivirus engines, and the completed sandbox did not issue a malicious finding. Several MITRE mappings suggest possible injection, service execution, and defense impairment, but no injection target, persistence artifact, or corroborating threat intelligence was identified.
The strongest evidence is the absence of detections across 75 engines, with no major or independent flags. One completed sandbox returned clean and recorded no injected target, persistence indicator, program markers, or registry modification. Its T1055, T1543.002, and mappings are noteworthy, but technique mappings alone do not establish malicious intent or confirm the exact actions. No malware-specific YARA rules, repository match, malicious child verdict, or named threat family corroborates those mappings. The file is rarely submitted, nine extracted children lack saved verdicts, and no complete host-reputation check is available, so the conclusion carries some residual uncertainty.
What We Detected
None of the 50 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the JAR, and the reporting major antivirus engines included Microsoft, BitDefender, ESET-NOD32, Fortinet, and Avira without detections. No named malware family, malware-specific YARA rule, or repository match was present.
Threat Behavior
One completed sandbox returned clean but mapped T1055, T1543.002, and T1562.001. These mappings can be associated with process injection, service execution, and defense impairment; however, no injected process target, persistence indicator, program markers, or registry change was recorded. The only recorded IP was identified as analysis-environment background traffic rather than sample activity. A complete reputation check for observed hosts is unavailable.
What To Do Now
Use the file only if it came from the expected mod distribution channel and its hash matches the publisher's value. Keep security software enabled, and consider testing it in an isolated game profile because the file is uncommon and nine extracted components do not have saved verdicts.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- The sandbox mapped possible process injection, service execution, and defense impairment, but it did not identify an injected target, persistence artifact, or malicious sandbox outcome.
- The file has only two known submissions, so the lack of detections carries less historical assurance than it would for widely distributed software.
- Nine extracted files lack saved verdicts, leaving incomplete file it created coverage.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 50 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file.
- The completed sandbox did not return a malicious finding.
- No malicious child verdict or persistence artifact was recorded.
- No malware-specific researcher rule or known malware-repository match was found.
- The sandbox produced mappings associated with possible process injection, service execution, and defense impairment.
- The file has only two known submissions, providing limited prevalence-based assurance.
- Nine extracted files do not have saved verdicts.
- A complete reputation check for observed hosts is unavailable.
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 16sandbox rule tags
- 3spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 15filesystem & mutex artifacts
What this file did when executed
This file was run in a sandbox and its runtime behaviour was observed.
Sandbox verdicts
1- VT: CLEANclean
Techniques observed in the sandbox
16MITRE ATT&CK techniques the sandbox mapped. Highlighted ones are rare in normal software; the others are common in legitimate programs too.
- T1055· Process injection
- T1059· Runs commands
- T1064
- T1074
- T1082· System recon
- T1105· Network file transfer
- T1106
- T1129· Loads modules
- T1202
- T1497· Sandbox evasion
- T1518.001· Checks your AV
- T1543.002· Service install
- T1562.001· Disables security
- T1564· Hides artifacts
- T1564.001· Hides artifacts
- T1564.003· Hides artifacts
Observed activity
Processes started
3Programs the file ran, with their command lines.
javaw.exe"C:\Program Files\Java\jre-1.8\bin\javaw.exe" -jar "C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\sample.jar"cmd.exeC:\Windows\SysWOW64\cmd.exe C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe /c ""C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.8.0_441\bin\java.exe" -javaagent:"C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\jartracer.jar" -jar "C:\Users\user\Desktop\download.jar"" >> C:\cmdlinestart.log 2>&1java.exe"C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.8.0_441\bin\java.exe" -javaagent:"C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\jartracer.jar" -jar "C:\Users\user\Desktop\download.jar"
Files
15Files the file created, changed or deleted.
- Written
C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_<USER>\2840 - Written
C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\.oracle_jre_usage\3903daac9bc4a3b7.timestamp - Written
C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\.oracle_jre_usage\17dfc292991c8786.timestamp - Written
C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_user - Written
C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_user\7108 - Written
C:\cmdlinestart.log
Show all 15 entries for files
- Written
\Device\ConDrv\\Connect - Written
/proc/3560/coredump_filter - Written
/tmp/hsperfdata_root/3560 - Written
/var/log/auth.log.1.gz - Written
/var/log/dpkg.log.1.gz - Written
/var/log/kern.log.1.gz - Written
/var/log/syslog.1.gz - Deleted
C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\hsperfdata_user\1840 - Deleted
/tmp/hsperfdata_root/3560
Sandbox background — not the file
13The analysis machine's own processes and connections, recorded in every run.
- VM process
icacls.exeC:\Windows\system32\icacls.exe C:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\.oracle_jre_usage /grant "everyone":(OI)(CI)M - VM process
conhost.exeC:\Windows\System32\conhost.exe C:\Windows\system32\conhost.exe 0xffffffff -ForceV1 - VM process
gzip/bin/gzip - VM process
sh/bin/sh sh -c "\n\t\tinvoke-rc.d --quiet cups restart > /dev/null\n" logrotate_script "/var/log/cups/*log " - VM process
invoke-rc.d/usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d invoke-rc.d --quiet cups restart - VM process
runlevel/sbin/runlevel
Show all 13 entries for sandbox background — not the file
- VM process
systemctl/usr/bin/systemctl systemctl --quiet is-enabled cups.service - VM process
ls/usr/bin/ls ls /etc/rc[S2345].d/S[0-9][0-9]cups - VM process
systemctl/usr/bin/systemctl systemctl --quiet is-active cups.service - VM process
sh/bin/sh sh -c /usr/lib/rsyslog/rsyslog-rotate logrotate_script /var/log/syslog - VM process
rsyslog-rotate/usr/lib/rsyslog/rsyslog-rotate - VM process
systemctl/usr/bin/systemctl systemctl kill -s HUP rsyslog.service - VM host
162.159.36.2
Files this sample writes at runtime
This file drops 3 children at runtime. None are currently flagged malicious in our cache. 3 have no saved verdict and were not checked; that is missing coverage, not a finding.
- ac951b841c2e30ad64a5…4a0bc0Not checkedno saved verdict
- 0353fadf59d926047f51…eb76b6Not checkedno saved verdict
- 7072018cd2a204c31842…2afc88Not checkedno saved verdict
Chapter 04
Technical details
None of the 50 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 5 complete · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 13, 2026, 7:07 AM UTC
- SHA-256
be042bed23d8defd397bf594cefa9f5063f8d5c402b98dac6fdb1f485506ab15- SHA-1
e36a700399bb6d131c25b270d138004273e2dff8- MD5
dee6ceed5db048b8d8ee9cb855e3c3e0
About this file
twilightforest-fabric-1.21.1-4.8.441.jar is a JAR file of 31.2 MB.
- Type and size
- JAR · 31.2 MB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Aug 21, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 2 distinct sourcesRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
First scanned
Antivirus consensus
0 of 50 engines flagged this file
25 of the 75 engines returned no result for this file (file type not supported, or the scan did not finish), so they did not check it.
- Tier-112 engines0flagged
- Tier-229 engines0flagged
- Low-trust9 engines0flagged
View all 75 engine results
- AcronisClean
- AhnLab-V3Clean
- AlibabaClean
- alibabacloudClean
- ALYacNo result
- Antiy-AVLClean
- APEXNo result
- ArcabitClean
- AvastNo result
- Avast-MobileClean
- AVGNo result
- AviraClean
- BitDefenderClean
- BitDefenderFalxNo result
- BkavNo result
- CAT-QuickHealClean
- ClamAVNo result
- CMCClean
- CrowdStrikeClean
- CTXClean
- CylanceNo result
- CynetClean
- DeepInstinctNo result
- DrWebClean
- ElasticNo result
- EmsisoftClean
- ESET-NOD32Clean
- F-SecureNo result
- FortinetClean
- GDataClean
- GoogleNo result
- GridinsoftClean
- huorongClean
- IkarusNo result
- JiangminNo result
- K7AntiVirusClean
- K7GWClean
- KasperskyNo result
- KingsoftClean
- LionicClean
- MalwarebytesClean
- MaxSecureNo result
- McAfeeDClean
- MicrosoftClean
- MicroWorld-eScanClean
- NANO-AntivirusClean
- PaloaltoNo result
- PandaClean
- RisingNo result
- SangforNo result
- SentinelOneClean
- SkyhighNo result
- SophosClean
- SUPERAntiSpywareClean
- SymantecClean
- SymantecMobileInsightNo result
- TACHYONClean
- tehtrisNo result
- TencentClean
- TrapmineNo result
- TrellixENSNo result
- TrendMicroClean
- TrendMicro-HouseCallClean
- TrustlookClean
- VaristClean
- VBA32Clean
- VIPREClean
- VirITClean
- ViRobotClean
- WebrootClean
- XcitiumClean
- YandexClean
- ZillyaNo result
- ZoneAlarmClean
- ZonerClean
Signatures and behavior heuristics
Low-severity pattern matches — worth noting but not on their own cause for alarm.
VirusTotal's sandbox summary maps this run to MITRE T1055 (Process Injection), but no injected process of the sample's own was recorded (the analysis VM's own WMI adapter, crash handlers and Chrome updater are not counted). VirusTotal maps T1055 on about half of all files no engine flags, so the mapping alone is not evidence of injection.
EvidenceT1055 (sandbox MITRE mapping)
How widely this file has been seen
Rarely uploaded, and first seen more than two weeks ago. Often niche legitimate software or internal tooling; not a strong malware signal on its own.
Chapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is twilightforest-fabric-1.21.1-4.8.441.jar safe?
What is twilightforest-fabric-1.21.1-4.8.441.jar?
How many antivirus engines detected twilightforest-fabric-1.21.1-4.8.441.jar?
What is the SHA-256 hash of twilightforest-fabric-1.21.1-4.8.441.jar?
Is it safe to open or run twilightforest-fabric-1.21.1-4.8.441.jar?
How up to date is this analysis of twilightforest-fabric-1.21.1-4.8.441.jar?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.