Is mikayla.zip safe?
No engine among 76 flagged this established ZIP archive, and independent threat-intelligence checks found no matching malware family or research rule.
The archive drew no malicious or suspicious detections from 76 engines, including no tier-1 detections. It has been known for over three years and has no external threat-intelligence matches, although no runtime analysis or complete host-reputation check is available.
bea26e629f4c10209c…f58b3dc778c706Recommended next actions
Before opening or extracting
Open or extract it only when its sender or download source has been independently verified.
If you already opened or extracted it
Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
The archive drew no malicious or suspicious detections from 76 engines, including no tier-1 detections. It has been known for over three years and has no external threat-intelligence matches, although no runtime analysis or complete host-reputation check is available.
All 76 antivirus engines were free of malicious or suspicious findings, with 18 tier-1 engines reporting no detection. The archive has existed for 1,154 days and was submitted 11 times by 10 sources, reducing concern that it is an untested new sample. MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, and YARAify supplied no corroborating threat match. Code signing is not meaningful for a ZIP archive, so the absence of a signature carries no negative weight. No sandbox run was completed, and no complete contacted-host reputation result is available, limiting conclusions about extracted contents.
What We Detected
None of 76 antivirus engines flagged the ZIP as malicious or suspicious. This includes 18 tier-1 engines reporting no detection, with Microsoft, Kaspersky, BitDefender, ESET-NOD32, and Fortinet among them. MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, and YARAify also returned no matching threat intelligence.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox observation is available because behaviour is null. The archive therefore has no observed runtime activity in this evidence, and contactedHosts is null, so no complete host-reputation cross-check can be claimed. No malicious dropped child was reported, but the droppedChildren block itself is unavailable.
What To Do Now
The static evidence is strongly reassuring. Keep endpoint protection enabled, extract the archive only if its source is expected, and scan the extracted files before opening them, especially if they include executables, scripts, or password-protected content.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- behaviour=null means the archive was not observed executing, so static scanning cannot establish what extracted content might do at runtime.
- contactedHosts=null means no complete host-reputation cross-check is available.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/76 engines reported malicious or suspicious results.
- 18 tier-1 engines reported no detection.
- The sample has 1,154 days of history.
- MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, and YARAify returned no threat match.
- No heuristics, brand mismatch, or adverse feedback was recorded.
- No completed runtime observation is available for the archive or its extracted contents.
- No complete contacted-host reputation cross-check is available.
- Archive contents are not described in the supplied evidence.
Keep endpoint protection enabled and scan the extracted contents before opening them. Exercise extra caution if the archive came from an unexpected sender or contains executable files or scripts.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete0 of 76 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 0 / 76engines flagged
- 10sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
0 of 76 antivirus engines flagged the file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
No completed runtime observation is available for this file.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceRuntime coverageObserved at - 03
The hash has been submitted 11 times from 10 sources.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
0 of 76 engines flagged this file
View all 76 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Moderate prevalence — neither rare nor common. No strong prior applies.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- mikayla.zip
- Format
- ZIP
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 91.8 KB
- Last analyzed
- Sep 11, 2026, 1:08 AM UTC
bea26e629f4c10209cda7bf1d7017a4f2f34c56363985af785f58b3dc778c706Safety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.
- Recovery step 01
Open or extract it only when its sender or download source has been independently verified.
- Recovery step 02
A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.
- Recovery step 03
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is mikayla.zip safe?
What is mikayla.zip?
How many antivirus engines detected mikayla.zip?
What is the SHA-256 hash of mikayla.zip?
Is it safe to open or extract mikayla.zip?
How up to date is this analysis of mikayla.zip?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.