Is Livro_de_Contas_Python.zip safe?
No antivirus engine detected the small ZIP archive, although its very limited history and lack of runtime analysis warrant routine caution when extracting it.
All 75 antivirus engines returned no malicious or suspicious detection, including 17 tier-1 engines. Static intelligence sources also found no match, but the archive is newly observed and has no completed runtime analysis, so inspect its extracted contents before opening them.
bf02ea64c76dd99a99…4bc0ee897aed66Recommended next actions
Before opening or extracting
Open or extract it only when its sender or download source has been independently verified.
If you already opened or extracted it
Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
All 75 antivirus engines returned no malicious or suspicious detection, including 17 tier-1 engines. Static intelligence sources also found no match, but the archive is newly observed and has no completed runtime analysis, so inspect its extracted contents before opening them.
The archive produced no malicious or suspicious detections across 75 antivirus engines. Seventeen tier-1 engines, including Kaspersky, Microsoft, ESET-NOD32, BitDefender, and Avast, reported no detection. Research intelligence supplied no MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, or YARAify match. However, the file has only one recorded submission, no similar-file history, and no completed sandbox observation. These limitations reduce confidence but do not outweigh the consistently negative static scan evidence.
What We Detected
The 5,652-byte ZIP archive received no malicious or suspicious detections from 75 antivirus engines. Seventeen tier-1 engines reported no detection, and no matching MalwareBazaar, CIRCL, or YARAify intelligence was present.
Threat Behavior
No completed runtime observation is available, so the behavior of files inside the archive was not assessed. No complete contacted-host reputation result is available either. The archive is newly observed and has only one recorded submission, which limits reputation-based assurance.
What To Do Now
Verify that the archive came from the expected source, scan the extracted files individually, and review any Python scripts before running them. Keep endpoint protection enabled and avoid executing unexpected scripts with elevated privileges.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- behaviour=null, so the archive's contents were not observed executing and static non-detection cannot establish how extracted files behave.
- contactedHosts=null means no complete host-reputation cross-check is available.
- The file is newly observed with only one submission, and similarHashes contains no historical comparison.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/75 engines reported a malicious or suspicious result
- engines.tier1ReportedClean=17 with engines.tier1Malicious=0
- externalIntel.malwareBazaar.hit=false
- externalIntel.yaraify.ruleCount=0
- adversarialInputFlags.anyInjectionSuspected=false
- prevalence.classification=rare_new with only one recorded submission
- behaviour=null, leaving extracted-file runtime behavior unobserved
- contactedHosts=null, so no complete host-reputation result is available
- similarHashes is empty, providing no historical comparison
The archive can be handled with routine caution: confirm its source, scan extracted files, and inspect Python code before execution. Keep endpoint protection enabled.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete0 of 75 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 0 / 75engines flagged
- 1sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
No completed runtime observation is available for this file.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceRuntime coverageObserved at - 03
The hash has been submitted 1 time from 1 source.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
0 of 75 engines flagged this file
View all 75 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Barely seen in the wild and first surfaced recently. That limits reputation evidence, but rarity alone is not proof of malware.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- Livro_de_Contas_Python.zip
- Format
- ZIP
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 5.5 KB
- Last analyzed
- Sep 13, 2026, 10:54 AM UTC
bf02ea64c76dd99a998f379a72829a365eebd7839ff32179db4bc0ee897aed66Safety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.
- Recovery step 01
Open or extract it only when its sender or download source has been independently verified.
- Recovery step 02
A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.
- Recovery step 03
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is Livro_de_Contas_Python.zip safe?
What is Livro_de_Contas_Python.zip?
How many antivirus engines detected Livro_de_Contas_Python.zip?
What is the SHA-256 hash of Livro_de_Contas_Python.zip?
Is it safe to open or extract Livro_de_Contas_Python.zip?
How up to date is this analysis of Livro_de_Contas_Python.zip?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.