File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is zylkur- 0. 6. 0- beta. jar. url safe? Yes, no threats found.
None of the 61 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this tiny link-style file, and available external checks found no malware-family evidence, though it lacks the test run.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Open it only if you trust the person or website it came from.
Keep your security software and system updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
0 of 61 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 61
- No result 14
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Not run
- First seen 16d ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
4 points against it and 4 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
None of the 61 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the 219-byte file, including the major antivirus engines, and external intelligence supplied no malware-family match. It is and was not run in a sandbox, so normal source verification remains appropriate before opening the referenced destination.
The strongest evidence is the absence of detections across 75 engines, with no major or independent engine flagging the sample. Its 219-byte size and compound “.jar.url” filename are consistent with a small link or metadata object rather than a Java archive itself, although the unknown file type prevents definitive format identification. Available MalwareBazaar and malware-specific YARA checks produced no corroborating hit. Five prior file-type matches also received favorable assessments, but those loose matches do not establish this file's identity. Because no sandbox run completed and contacted-host reputation was not checked or saved, the destination and runtime effects remain unobserved. Its short history (seen shortly before Oct 10, 2026) lowers confidence modestly without independently indicating malware.
What We Detected
None of the 61 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the 219-byte sample, and no major antivirus engines supplied a threat label or family name. Available external checks also found no MalwareBazaar match or malware-specific YARA rule.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox observation is available, so behavior in the test run cannot be characterized. A complete reputation result for any destination referenced by the file is also unavailable. The compound “.jar.url” name may indicate a shortcut or link associated with a Java archive, but the reported file type remains unknown.
What To Do Now
Verify that the file came from the expected project or sender before opening it. If it launches a browser or downloads another file, inspect the destination and scan the downloaded content while keeping security software enabled.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- The file was first observed on Oct 10, 2026 and has only one submission, so its history is too limited to establish broad reputation.
- No sandbox run completed, and no complete reputation check of potential contacted hosts is available.
- The five prior favorable results are file-type-only matches, not hash, signer, or publisher matches.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 61 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the file.
- No major antivirus engines reported a threat family.
- Available external intelligence checks found no known malware or malware-specific rule match.
- Five loosely similar file-type samples previously received favorable assessments.
- The file is and has only one recorded submission.
- No completed sandbox run is available to show what the file opens or downloads.
- The compound extension could obscure that this is a link-style file rather than the named Java archive.
- No complete reputation check is available for any referenced destination.
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
Technical details
None of the 61 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 10, 2026, 9:31 AM UTC
- SHA-256
c4021b47ed3d6068ee36cd95408d6f9c31b4f9b59b4e2514ab84084f9144f65c- SHA-1
5064b0a3eb7cf173158f40df1074cc3a1901cdd0- MD5
692a900bd121842f3506576566d04946
About this file
zylkur-0.6.0-beta.jar.url is an unknown file of 219 B.
- Type and size
- unknown · 219 B
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Oct 10, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 1 sourceRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75) and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is zylkur-0.6.0-beta.jar.url safe?
What is zylkur-0.6.0-beta.jar.url?
How many antivirus engines detected zylkur-0.6.0-beta.jar.url?
What is the SHA-256 hash of zylkur-0.6.0-beta.jar.url?
Is it safe to open zylkur-0.6.0-beta.jar.url?
How up to date is this analysis of zylkur-0.6.0-beta.jar.url?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.