Is cli.exe safe?
Two independent tier-1 detections and seven additional flags raise substantial concern, but conflicting generic labels and uncorroborating runtime evidence prevent family attribution.
Nine of 74 engines flagged this unsigned executable, including Microsoft and TrendMicro-HouseCall as two independent tier-1 detections. However, most tier-1 engines were silent, labels conflict, and one completed sandbox run produced no malicious verdict or offensive behavior, leaving the evidence materially mixed.
c434ce8620057d9dd9…1052775e7ddc70Recommended next actions
Before running
Do not run it until the source and publisher can be verified independently.
If you already ran it
Stop using it, scan the device, and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts. Get a fresh copy from the developer's official site or an official app store.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
Nine of 74 engines flagged this unsigned executable, including Microsoft and TrendMicro-HouseCall as two independent tier-1 detections. However, most tier-1 engines were silent, labels conflict, and one completed sandbox run produced no malicious verdict or offensive behavior, leaving the evidence materially mixed.
The strongest concern is that 9 of 74 engines detected the executable, with Microsoft and TrendMicro-HouseCall contributing two independent tier-1 flags. Their labels do not establish consensus: one names Wacatac, another uses a generic identifier, and other engines suggest LuaJIT abuse or Matanbuchus. The file is unsigned and carries a reputation score of -54, which provides no publisher assurance and adds risk. Conversely, 15 tier-1 engines did not detect it, and one completed sandbox run recorded no malicious verdict, offensive techniques, persistence, or dropped payload hashes. No external research rule, known-malware record, or similar-file history corroborates a family, while no complete contacted-host reputation result is available.
What We Detected
Nine of 74 antivirus engines flagged the executable. Microsoft reported Wacatac and TrendMicro-HouseCall reported TL0101HU26Z8, accounting for two independent tier-1 detections; CrowdStrike, Elastic, Malwarebytes, Skyhigh, TrellixENS, MaxSecure, and VBA32 also raised alerts. The labels are inconsistent and mostly generic, so they do not reliably identify one malware family.
Threat Behavior
One completed sandbox run recorded eight techniques commonly seen in both ordinary software and threats, including T1027, T1071, T1082, and T1083. It produced no malicious sandbox verdict, offensive-only technique, persistence indicator, contacted endpoint, or dropped-file hash. No complete contacted-host reputation cross-check is available, so no complete contacted-host reputation result was available.
What To Do Now
Do not run the file on a production or personal system unless its origin and checksum can be verified through the software publisher's official release channel. Keep endpoint protection enabled, quarantine the file, and obtain a fresh copy from a trusted source if it was unexpected.
Where this verdict could be wrong5 caveats
- 15 of 17 tier-1 engines did not detect the sample, including BitDefender, ESET-NOD32, Fortinet, and Avast.
- The completed sandbox run recorded no offensive techniques, persistence indicators, dropped hashes, or malicious sandbox verdict.
- externalIntel.malwareBazaar.hit=false and externalIntel.yaraify.ruleCount=0, although absence of those hits does not establish benignity.
- peAnalysis.highEntropyCode=false and peAnalysis.likelyPacked=false, providing no static packing signal.
- The communityComments[0] annotation reports a sandbox MAL score of 48/100, but it is uncorroborated third-party context rather than a structured runtime verdict.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 15 of 17 tier-1 engines did not detect the sample
- One sandbox run produced no malicious verdict
- No offensive techniques or persistence indicators were observed
- No dropped payload hashes were recorded
- No packing or high-entropy code signal was found
- 9/74 antivirus detections
- Two independent tier-1 detections
- Unsigned Win32 executable
- Reputation score of -54
- Conflicting generic trojan and riskware labels
- No complete contacted-host reputation cross-check
Quarantine the executable and verify its SHA-256 with the publisher or official distribution channel before use. Keep antivirus and endpoint protection enabled, and replace the file with a trusted copy if verification is unavailable.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete9 of 74 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
Complete1 isolated runtime environment contributed observations.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime flight recorder
Capture complete- 1isolated sandbox run
- 8MITRE ATT&CK techniques
- 3spawned processes
- 0network contacts
- 2filesystem & mutex artifacts
What this file does
Observed actions and their security significance
Moderate concern: Contained obfuscated or packed code that makes inspection harder.
Moderate concern: Communicated over a common application protocol; malware can use this for command-and-control.
Moderate concern: Scans through your files and folders.
Note: Collects details about your system.
Note: Loads extra code modules while running.
These are observed capabilities from an isolated analysis. A technique does not prove malicious intent on its own, and the file never ran on your device.
Attack story
Runtime observations grouped by analysis stage. Arrows organize the stages; they do not claim chronology or causality.
Input file
The submitted object
- FileObserved
cli.exe
c434ce8620057d9dd9073b4af8382bf27e85729d152164909f1052775e7ddc70
01Uploaded file
Processes
Runtime execution
- ProcessObserved
Observed process
"C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\program.exe"
02Isolated runtime analysis - ProcessObserved
Observed process
"C:\Users\user\Desktop\software.exe"
03Isolated runtime analysis - +1 more recorded observation in Analyst mode
Files
Created or changed
- Written fileObserved
ConDrv
\Device\ConDrv
04Isolated runtime analysis - Written fileObserved
Connect
\Device\ConDrv\\Connect
05Isolated runtime analysis - +1 more recorded observation in Analyst mode
5 recorded facts from one runtime window. Every fact remains independently traceable in Analyst mode.
What this file did when executed
This file was detonated in 1 sandbox and its runtime behaviour was observed.
Adversary techniques mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
- \Device\ConDrv
- \Device\ConDrv\\Connect
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 9 / 74engines flagged
- 95sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
9 of 74 antivirus engines flagged the file, including CrowdStrike and Elastic.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
The hash has been submitted 108 times from 95 sources.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at - 03
Scanned file: cli.exe — c434ce8620057d9dd9073b4af8382bf27e85729d152164909f1052775e7ddc70
ProvenanceObservedSourceUploaded fileObserved at - 04
Observed process — "C:\Users\<USER>\Desktop\program.exe"
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 05
Observed process — "C:\Users\user\Desktop\software.exe"
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 06
File written: ConDrv — \Device\ConDrv
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 07
File written: Connect — \Device\ConDrv\\Connect
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
Category: generic-trojan
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
9 of 74 engines flagged this file
View all 74 engine results
Section entropy & packers
No high-entropy executable section or known packer signature was detected. Data and resource sections can still have high entropy without indicating packed code.
How widely this file has been seen
Moderate prevalence — neither rare nor common. No strong prior applies.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- cli.exe
- Format
- Win32 EXE
- Code signing
- No verified publisher
- Size
- 742.5 KB
- Last analyzed
- Sep 19, 2026, 4:44 AM UTC
c434ce8620057d9dd9073b4af8382bf27e85729d152164909f1052775e7ddc70Safety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
We couldn't fully clear this file. Treat it with caution.
- Recovery step 01
Don't run it unless you're certain it came from a source you trust.
- Recovery step 02
Check where you got it — an unexpected attachment or a random download link is a red flag.
- Recovery step 03
If its origin cannot be confirmed, delete this file and use a fresh copy from a trusted source. Get a fresh copy from the developer's official site or an official app store.
- Recovery step 04
If you're still unsure, scan it again in a day or two — detections often catch up on newer files.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is cli.exe safe, or is it malware?
What is cli.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected cli.exe?
I already downloaded and ran cli.exe — what should I do?
How do I remove cli.exe?
What kind of malware is cli.exe?
What is the SHA-256 hash of cli.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of cli.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.