File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is viruz. sys safe? Yes, no threats found.
Only 2 of the 72 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this unsigned executable, both using generic low-confidence labels, while all 18 major antivirus engines remained silent.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Use it only with hardware or software from the original manufacturer.
Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
2 of 72 flagged
- Flagged 2
- No detection 70
- No result 4
- Code signing Unsigned
- Test run Not run
- First seen 1y ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
3 points against it and 3 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
The two detections are isolated, generic results from lower-confidence engines, with no named malware family or stronger antivirus support. Although the executable lacks a verified publisher signature and has no observation from the test run, the available evidence indicates that these detections are likely false positives.
None of the 18 major antivirus engines detected it, and there is no agreement on a malware family. Public sample intelligence and malware-specific community rules add no corroboration. The executable is unsigned, which prevents its publisher from being authenticated but does not independently establish harmful intent. No completed observation from the test run or our own static examination is available, so confidence is moderate rather than absolute.
What We Detected
Bkav and McAfeeD flagged the executable, accounting for 2 of the 72 antivirus engines that checked it.
Threat Behavior
No completed observation from the test run is available, and our static analysis was not run on the uploaded bytes. There is therefore no observed execution behavior, malicious network activity, or code-level finding available to corroborate the two detections. A complete host-reputation result is also unavailable.
What To Do Now
The detection pattern is most consistent with false positives. Because the executable is unsigned and its behavior was not observed, obtain it only from a source you trust, keep security software enabled, and avoid running it if its origin is unclear.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- The executable is unsigned, so there is no verified publisher identity supporting its origin.
- No runtime or first-party static examination was completed, leaving behavior and code-level intent unverified.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- The two detections do not agree on a recognized malware family.
- No malware-specific community rule or public sample-database listing corroborates the detections.
- The file has been known for over 600 days without broader antivirus convergence.
- The executable has no verified publisher signature.
- Two antivirus engines reported generic malware detections.
- No completed observation from the test run or first-party static examination is available.
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
Technical details
2 of the 72 antivirus engines that checked it flag it; no publisher signature.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 2
The saved verdict treats these detections as likely false positives.
- BkavW64.AIDetectMalware
- McAfeeDti!CE5B7AAD9B51
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Apr 20, 2026, 6:30 PM UTC
- SHA-256
ce5b7aad9b51a3df9bbaff5526c1addcb844ed7aeb1fca368d7b41462f6333a7- SHA-1
0b1dd0b32b8056302d7151182e06788cefa89978- MD5
b69d358dd6971f7969942576e85cdc7f
About this file
viruz.sys is a Win32 EXE file of 6.9 kB.
- Type and size
- Win32 EXE · 6.9 kB
- Signer
- UnsignedNo code signature.
- First seen
- Jan 23, 2025On VirusTotal.
First scanned Updated
Antivirus consensus
2 of 72 engines flagged this file
4 of the 76 engines returned no result for this file (file type not supported, or the scan did not finish), so they did not check it.
- Tier-118 engines0flagged
- Tier-236 engines0flagged
- Low-trust18 engines2flagged
View all 76 engine results
- BkavMalicious: W64.AIDetectMalware
- McAfeeDMalicious: ti!CE5B7AAD9B51
- AcronisClean
- AhnLab-V3Clean
- AlibabaClean
- alibabacloudClean
- ALYacClean
- Antiy-AVLClean
- APEXClean
- ArcabitClean
- AvastClean
- Avast-MobileNo result
- AVGClean
- AviraClean
- BaiduClean
- BitDefenderClean
- BitDefenderFalxNo result
- CAT-QuickHealClean
- ClamAVClean
- CMCClean
- CrowdStrikeClean
- CTXClean
- CylanceClean
- CynetClean
- DeepInstinctClean
- DrWebClean
- ElasticClean
- EmsisoftClean
- ESET-NOD32Clean
- F-SecureClean
- FortinetClean
- GDataClean
- GoogleClean
- GridinsoftClean
- huorongClean
- IkarusClean
- JiangminClean
- K7AntiVirusClean
- K7GWClean
- KasperskyClean
- KingsoftClean
- LionicClean
- MalwarebytesClean
- MaxSecureClean
- MicrosoftClean
- MicroWorld-eScanClean
- NANO-AntivirusClean
- PaloaltoClean
- PandaClean
- RisingClean
- SangforClean
- SentinelOneClean
- SkyhighClean
- SophosClean
- SUPERAntiSpywareClean
- SymantecClean
- SymantecMobileInsightNo result
- TACHYONClean
- tehtrisClean
- TencentClean
- TrapmineClean
- TrellixENSClean
- TrendMicroClean
- TrendMicro-HouseCallClean
- TrustlookNo result
- VaristClean
- VBA32Clean
- VIPREClean
- VirITClean
- ViRobotClean
- WebrootClean
- XcitiumClean
- YandexClean
- ZillyaClean
- ZoneAlarmClean
- ZonerClean
Chapter 04
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is viruz.sys safe?
What is viruz.sys?
How many antivirus engines detected viruz.sys?
What is the SHA-256 hash of viruz.sys?
Is it safe to use viruz.sys?
How up to date is this analysis of viruz.sys?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.