File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is Mf
Widely submitted RAR archive with zero engine detections and established prevalence.
Strong evidence · Widely seen for a long time, and nothing harmful found.
Treat as low-risk commodity archive; verify contents after extraction.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Open it only if you trust the person or website you got it from.
Keep your security software and system updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
0 of 60 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 60
- No result 16
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Not run
- First seen 10mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
0 points against it and 3 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
No engines flagged the file. It shows widely seen and long established prevalence across 165 sources over 211 days with no sandbox, host, or file it created signals.
The file is a RAR that has been submitted 184 times by 165 sources since late 2025, placing it in the widely seen and long established bucket. Filename analysis shows no security-software mimicry and none of our behaviour rules matched. Without sandbox execution data the behaviour in the test run remains unknown, but the combination of age, volume, and clean engine results supports a safe classification.
What We Detected
63 of the 60 antivirus engines that checked it processed the RAR; none returned a malicious or suspicious label. Major antivirus engines (Avast, AVG, Avira, BitDefender, DrWeb, Emsisoft, ESET-NOD32, F-Secure, Fortinet, GData, Ikarus, Kaspersky, Microsoft) all reported clean.
Threat Behavior
No sandbox execution data, no contacted hosts, no files it created, and no external-intel hits (CIRCL, MalwareBazaar, YARAify). The archive carries no digital signature.
What To Do Now
Extract only inside a controlled environment and scan the resulting contents with up-to-date security software before execution.
Where this verdict could be wrong1 caveat
- RAR archive with generic filename could still contain malicious contents once extracted; absence of sandbox data leaves behaviour in the test run unverified.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- Zero detections across major and smaller engines
- Established widely seen and long established prevalence
- No adversarial filename or injection flags
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
Technical details
None of the 60 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Jul 8, 2026, 2:31 PM UTC
- SHA-256
d5c5bb2e7273e825814cb2fd7b392ac5768241dadb2ef04033fd3a82e2f1d3bb- SHA-1
613dcd060cfa8b37d22d9b5d741316870f455341- MD5
dee620e541cc2f8617e3248bfbab1654
About this file
MfW10_Fix_Repair_GDK_V6_Generic.rar is an RAR file of 8.9 MB.
- Type and size
- RAR · 8.9 MB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Dec 10, 2025On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 165 distinct sources
First scanned
Includes every engine result (76) and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is MfW10_Fix_Repair_GDK_V6_Generic.rar safe?
What is MfW10_Fix_Repair_GDK_V6_Generic.rar?
How many antivirus engines detected MfW10_Fix_Repair_GDK_V6_Generic.rar?
What is the SHA-256 hash of MfW10_Fix_Repair_GDK_V6_Generic.rar?
Is it safe to open or extract MfW10_Fix_Repair_GDK_V6_Generic.rar?
How up to date is this analysis of MfW10_Fix_Repair_GDK_V6_Generic.rar?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.