File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is $RQETMF7.
A lone generic detection lacks major support, while the completed sandbox run and full reputation check of observed network contacts found no corroborating threat.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Open it only if you trust the person or website you got it from.
Keep your security software and system updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
1 of 59 flagged
- Flagged 1
- No detection 58
- No result 16
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Completed
- First seen 2mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
3 points against it and 5 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
Only 1 of the 59 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this RAR archive, using a generic label, and no major antivirus engines identified malware. The completed sandbox run returned clean and all distinct observed IP contacts were reputation-checked without adverse results, although three offensive MITRE mappings and ten unclassified extracted files warrant ordinary caution.
The antivirus result is isolated: Google supplied the only detection among 75 engines, with no major detection or family consensus. One completed sandbox run returned clean and showed an installer-like sequence involving OMIX Cockpit, Node.js, and Edge WebView2. The mapping raises concern, but no injected process was identified; and likewise lack a corroborating malicious runtime verdict. All 15 distinct contacted IPs were included within the 19 host-reputation inspections, and none was listed as malicious or suspicious. No malware-specific YARA rule, MalwareBazaar record, malicious extracted child, persistence indicator, or named threat family supports the lone detection. The ten extracted children remain unclassified, so the evidence favors a false positive without proving every bundled component benign.
What We Detected
Only 1 of the 59 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the RAR archive. Google used the generic label “Detected”; no major antivirus engines flagged it and no engine consensus identified a malware family. Malware-specific external checks also produced no corroborating family rule or known sample record.
Threat Behavior
One completed sandbox run returned clean and launched an OMIX Cockpit installer, its temporary setup process, Omix.exe, Node.js, and Microsoft Edge WebView2. The run mapped T1055, T1485, and T1562.001, but it recorded no injected target process, no persistence indicators, and no malicious sandbox conclusion. The sample contacted 15 distinct IP addresses; the host-reputation check covered those contacts and found none listed as malicious or suspicious.
What To Do Now
The evidence is most consistent with an isolated false positive, but the archive contains ten extracted files without individual saved verdicts. Obtain the archive from the expected source, verify its hash if the publisher provides one, keep security software enabled, and rescan the extracted installer before execution if its origin is uncertain.
Where this verdict could be wrong4 caveats
- The runtime mapping includes T1055, T1485, and T1562.001, which can represent process injection, data destruction, and defense impairment, although no injection target or malicious sandbox verdict corroborates them.
- One engine, Google, flagged the archive generically; this is a real counter-signal but does not identify a family or receive major support.
- The sample made direct-IP connections, a pattern sometimes associated with remote control, though every distinct observed IP received a complete reputation check without a malicious or suspicious result.
- The 10 extracted files have no saved verdicts, leaving their individual safety unresolved rather than established.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- No major antivirus engines flagged the file, and no malware family consensus formed.
- The completed sandbox run returned clean.
- Every distinct observed network contact was covered by the host-reputation check, with no malicious or suspicious result.
- No malware-specific YARA rule or MalwareBazaar record matched the archive.
- No persistence indicator or saved malicious child verdict was found.
- The sandbox mapped activity associated with possible process injection, data destruction, and defense impairment, although it did not identify an injection target or conclude that the run was malicious.
- One antivirus engine flagged the archive with a generic detection.
- The program contacted external IP addresses directly rather than recording application domains.
6 sources checked · all complete. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 22sandbox rule tags
- 6spawned processes
- 19network contacts
- 34filesystem & mutex artifacts
Includes the sandbox verdicts, 22 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 9 dropped files.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
1 of the 59 antivirus engines that checked it flags it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · all complete. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 1
The saved verdict treats these detections as likely false positives.
- GoogleDetected
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 9, 2026, 1:37 PM UTC
- SHA-256
d62b0d6b8a5f07f621912d0f7fc3efaa1f4fb1247113242e5c93551b35465145- SHA-1
00d24e46cdc957d687278f2b2352ac8d1281d1dd- MD5
636f8ad12075c0ed5d742a43642dc43f
About this file
$RQETMF7.rar is an RAR file of 3.8 MB.
- Type and size
- RAR · 3.8 MB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Aug 26, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 15 distinct sources
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75), 1 matched signature rule and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is $RQETMF7.rar safe?
What is $RQETMF7.rar?
How many antivirus engines detected $RQETMF7.rar?
What is the SHA-256 hash of $RQETMF7.rar?
Is it safe to open or extract $RQETMF7.rar?
How up to date is this analysis of $RQETMF7.rar?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.