File scan report
Verdict Low Risk
Is dinput8wrapper. url safe? Not fully confirmed.
90-byte .url file with zero detections but only one submission and no data from the test run.
Why not Safe? Only one source had seen it when we scanned it.
Limited evidence · Nothing points to a problem, but little confirms who made it.
Good practice2 tips
Low Risk: no threat found, but we could not fully confirm this file.
Get it from the publisher's own website or app store, not from a re-upload or a link someone sent you.
Keep your security software on, and stop if the file does anything you didn't expect.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
0 of 61 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 61
- No result 14
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Not run
- First seen 2mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
3 points against it and 2 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
No engines flagged the file, yet the evidence is limited and the file is brand new. Similar filetype matches produced mostly unknown verdicts. Without sandbox or external-intel results, the sample remains inconclusive.
All 61 antivirus engines that checked it returned clean results, including 17 major antivirus engines. The file is a 90-byte .url of unknown type, first seen on Aug 9, 2026, with no signing, no sandbox data, and no external-intel hits. Similar filetype matches in the RAG set were mostly unknown due to limited evidence. The absence of malicious signals is noted, but the lack of completed analysis prevents a definitive safe classification.
What We Detected
Zero detections across 75 engines; 61 engines reported. File is a 90-byte Internet shortcut (.url) with no code-signing metadata.
Threat Behavior
No sandbox execution data available. No contacted hosts, files it created, or external-intel matches recorded.
What To Do Now
Re-scan after more engines report or obtain sandbox results. Treat the file as unverified until additional evidence appears.
Where this verdict could be wrong1 caveat
- similarHashes shows one prior suspicious verdict on filetype match, but that file was an executable with 2 malicious detections, unlike this 90-byte URL file.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- 0/61 engines malicious
- no rule triggers
- rare and prevalence
- unknown file type
- no sandbox coverage
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
Technical details
None of the 61 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Aug 9, 2026, 4:37 PM UTC
- SHA-256
d720d0248b698c2b6b609086b99b3ddcf5f7f2d69b6b257a9e4a36e86a529ee7- SHA-1
2281ab9db5644f9771f0b9bc6144ec2af2a79f21- MD5
57dfeb27d68ff2677ee4a9bd3105318e
About this file
dinput8wrapper.url is an unknown file of 90 B.
- Type and size
- unknown · 90 B
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Aug 9, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 1 sourceRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75) and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 5 questions people ask most about this file.
Is dinput8wrapper.url safe?
What is dinput8wrapper.url?
How many antivirus engines detected dinput8wrapper.url?
What is the SHA-256 hash of dinput8wrapper.url?
How up to date is this analysis of dinput8wrapper.url?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.