Is ransom_file.zip safe?
Only 2 of 75 engines detected the archive, but possible process injection and defense-evasion activity warrant caution despite absent high-trust corroboration.
Zillya identified XWorm and Webroot issued a generic Trojan detection, but all 17 reporting tier-1 engines were undetected. A sandbox recorded process injection, service execution, and security-control impairment mappings, yet returned no malicious verdict; keep protection enabled and avoid opening the archive unless its origin is verified.
d92fee7766d4e44391…6170094f276b89Recommended next actions
Before opening or extracting
Do not open or extract it until the source can be verified independently.
If you already opened or extracted it
Stop using it, scan the device, and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts. Get a fresh copy from the original trusted source and verify its exact hash when possible.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
Zillya identified XWorm and Webroot issued a generic Trojan detection, but all 17 reporting tier-1 engines were undetected. A sandbox recorded process injection, service execution, and security-control impairment mappings, yet returned no malicious verdict; keep protection enabled and avoid opening the archive unless its origin is verified.
Two of 75 engines flagged the archive, and neither detection represents a tier-1 vote. Zillya named XWorm, but Webroot supplied only a generic Trojan label, leaving the family claim uncorroborated. One completed sandbox mapped activity to process injection, service execution, and impairment of defenses, although that sandbox did not issue a malicious verdict. Ten dropped children produced no malicious result, but all remained unclassified, so they do not establish benign contents. Research feeds and prior-similarity records provided no additional corroboration, making the evidence materially mixed.
What We Detected
Two of 75 antivirus engines flagged the ZIP archive. Zillya reported Backdoor.XWorm.Win32.3294, while Webroot reported Win.Trojan.Gen; none of the 17 reporting tier-1 engines detected it, and there was no tier-1 family consensus.
Threat Behavior
One completed sandbox mapped execution to T1055 process injection, T1543.002 service execution, and T1562.001 impairment of defenses. These are meaningful risk indicators, but the sandbox itself did not issue a malicious verdict. Ten dropped files were inspected without a malicious child result, although all ten remained unclassified. Host-reputation coverage included the three contacted domains but not the separately observed IP address, so no complete reputation conclusion is available for every contact.
What To Do Now
Do not open or extract this archive on a production system until its source and expected contents are verified. Keep endpoint protection enabled, quarantine the file if it was unsolicited, and obtain a fresh copy from a trusted source when possible.
Where this verdict could be wrong4 caveats
- All 17 reporting tier-1 engines were undetected, which weighs against the isolated XWorm label.
- The sole completed sandbox returned a clean verdict despite recording three offensive MITRE mappings.
- The 10 inspected children had no malicious verdict, but all remained unclassified rather than affirmatively clean.
- No independent MalwareBazaar or YARAify hit corroborates Zillya's XWorm identification.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- All 17 reporting tier-1 engines were undetected.
- Only 2 of 75 engines flagged the archive.
- behaviour.hasMaliciousSandboxVerdict=false.
- droppedChildren.hasMaliciousChild=false.
- MalwareBazaar and YARAify returned no corroborating hits.
- Zillya identified Backdoor.XWorm.Win32.3294.
- Webroot reported Win.Trojan.Gen.
- Runtime evidence mapped possible process injection to T1055.
- Runtime evidence included T1543.002 and T1562.001.
- The archive contains executable content and uses long sleeps and debugger-environment checks.
- All 10 dropped children remain unclassified.
Keep security protection enabled and quarantine the archive unless it came from a verified source and its contents are expected. If required for work, inspect it only in an isolated analysis environment.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete2 of 75 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
Complete1 isolated runtime environment contributed observations.
Network
Partial3 of 4 contacted hosts were cross-checked; coverage is incomplete.
YARA
Complete1 signature or behavior rule matched.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Runtime flight recorder
Capture complete- 1isolated sandbox run
- 13MITRE ATT&CK techniques
- 15spawned processes
- 4network contacts
- 40filesystem & mutex artifacts
What this file does
Observed actions and their security significance
High concern: Injected code into another process, a technique that can conceal execution.
High concern: Created or modified a system service, which can keep code running.
High concern: Attempted to impair or bypass security controls.
High concern: Manipulated how the operating system loads code, which can redirect execution.
Moderate concern: Removed execution artefacts or logs, which can conceal activity.
Moderate concern: Communicated over a common application protocol; malware can use this for command-and-control.
Moderate concern: Checked the environment for virtualisation or analysis tools.
These are observed capabilities from an isolated analysis. A technique does not prove malicious intent on its own, and the file never ran on your device.
Attack story
Runtime observations grouped by analysis stage. Arrows organize the stages; they do not claim chronology or causality.
Input file
The submitted object
- FileObserved
ransom_file.zip
d92fee7766d4e443918ed84ea06db9a0def70fef521510a3216170094f276b89
01Uploaded file
Processes
Runtime execution
- ProcessObserved
Observed process
"C:\Windows\system32\rundll32.exe" "C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\ransom/_internal/api-ms-win-core-processenvironment-l1-1-0.dll",#1
02Isolated runtime analysis - ProcessObserved
Observed process
"C:\Windows\system32\rundll32.exe" "C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\ransom/_internal/api-ms-win-core-processthreads-l1-1-0.dll",#1
03Isolated runtime analysis - +1 more recorded observation in Analyst mode
Files
Created or changed
- Written fileObserved
Temp
C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\Temp
04Isolated runtime analysis - Written fileObserved
5b522947-b9bd-47d8-a48e-6759d8b30af0
C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\Temp\5b522947-b9bd-47d8-a48e-6759d8b30af0
05Isolated runtime analysis - +1 more recorded observation in Analyst mode
Network
Hosts contacted
- Contacted hostObserved
a1672.dscr.akamai.net
Contact observed during runtime.
06Isolated runtime analysis - Contacted hostObserved
eip-terr-na.cdp1.digicert.com.akahost.net
Contact observed during runtime.
07Isolated runtime analysis - +1 more recorded observation in Analyst mode
7 recorded facts from one runtime window. Every fact remains independently traceable in Analyst mode.
What this file did when executed
This file was detonated in 1 sandbox and its runtime behaviour was observed.
Adversary techniques mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
- a1672.dscr.akamai.net
- eip-terr-na.cdp1.digicert.com.akahost.net
- nexusrules.officeapps.live.com
- 162.159.36.2
- C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\Temp
- C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\Temp\5b522947-b9bd-47d8-a48e-6759d8b30af0
- C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\ReportQueue
- C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\Temp\6bbdfb46-4ca7-47a4-ab62-d60a48caba64
- C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\ReportArchive
- C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\Temp\WERD344.tmp
- C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\Temp\WER3191.tmp
- C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\Temp\WER8BC8.tmp
- C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\Temp\WERD344.tmp.dmp
- C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\Temp\WER3191.tmp.WERInternalMetadata.xml
- Local\WERReportingForProcess2732
- Global\3e906ec9-6715-4ac5-8802-e9f216013f27
- Local\WERReportingForProcess4784
- Global\47677883-f498-4e79-9b31-ab9f8313b8a7
- Local\WERReportingForProcess2204
Files this sample writes at runtime
This file drops 10 children at runtime. None are currently flagged malicious in our cache.
- 8650d1b69acbf7a5ccb8…1c6f7cNever scannednever seen before
- 3cebc45bf479ad74cfab…ce0416Never scannednever seen before
- 3e363bf82545f24cce8c…308a5dNever scannednever seen before
- 8bc7c10b1851aea644e9…96adb7Never scannednever seen before
- 48f4a239c25354f0e9f8…17ecedNever scannednever seen before
- 9e5f401d387c86eab325…f20466Never scannednever seen before
- 359c9c02a9fa3de10ba4…52ab21Never scannednever seen before
- f7ecc5ae6eb297c79aad…1e982aNever scannednever seen before
- e9b7aecd456f1d228860…b73ec2Never scannednever seen before
- 3271d39d7b4dcd841e8e…efe5e5Never scannednever seen before
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 1rule hit recorded
- 2 / 75engines flagged
- 201sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
1 high-confidence signature or behavior rule matched this file.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceDerivedSourceSignature and behavior rulesObserved at - 02
2 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file, including Webroot and Zillya.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 03
The hash has been submitted 226 times from 201 sources.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at - 04
Scanned file: ransom_file.zip — d92fee7766d4e443918ed84ea06db9a0def70fef521510a3216170094f276b89
ProvenanceObservedSourceUploaded fileObserved at - 05
Observed process — "C:\Windows\system32\rundll32.exe" "C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\ransom/_internal/api-ms-win-core-processenvironment-l1-1-0.dll",#1
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 06
Observed process — "C:\Windows\system32\rundll32.exe" "C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\ransom/_internal/api-ms-win-core-processthreads-l1-1-0.dll",#1
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 07
File written: Temp — C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\Temp
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 08
File written: 5b522947-b9bd-47d8-a48e-6759d8b30af0 — C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\Temp\5b522947-b9bd-47d8-a48e-6759d8b30af0
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 09
Contacted host: a1672.dscr.akamai.net — Contact observed during runtime.
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at - 10
Contacted host: eip-terr-na.cdp1.digicert.com.akahost.net — Contact observed during runtime.
ProvenanceObservedSourceIsolated runtime analysisObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
The available sources did not agree on a named threat category.
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
Signatures and behavior heuristics
A community signature or high-severity behavioral heuristic matched. Signatures identify known patterns; heuristics are strong leads but are not proof on their own.
The saved runtime evidence maps this activity to MITRE T1055 (Process Injection). The mapping supports possible process injection, but it does not prove the exact injection method or the operator's intent.
Evidence"C:\Windows\system32\rundll32.exe" "C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\ransom/_internal/api-ms-win-core-processenvironment-l1-1-0.dll",#1
2 of 75 engines flagged this file
View all 75 engine results
PE structure
Not applicablePE structure analysis applies to Windows executable formats, not this file type.
How widely this file has been seen
Lots of people are uploading this but it's recent — typical of newly-released legitimate software. Low prior for malware.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- ransom_file.zip
- Format
- ZIP
- Code signing
- Not applicable to this file type
- Size
- 28.7 MB
- Last analyzed
- Oct 5, 2026, 1:31 PM UTC
d92fee7766d4e443918ed84ea06db9a0def70fef521510a3216170094f276b89Safety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
We couldn't fully clear this file. Treat it with caution.
- Recovery step 01
Don't open or extract it unless you're certain it came from a source you trust.
- Recovery step 02
Check where you got it — an unexpected attachment or a random download link is a red flag.
- Recovery step 03
If its origin cannot be confirmed, delete this archive and use a fresh copy from a trusted source. Get a fresh copy from the original trusted source and verify its exact hash when possible.
- Recovery step 04
If you're still unsure, scan it again in a day or two — detections often catch up on newer files.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is ransom_file.zip safe, or is it malware?
What is ransom_file.zip?
How many antivirus engines detected ransom_file.zip?
I already downloaded and opened or extracted ransom_file.zip — what should I do?
How do I remove ransom_file.zip?
What is the SHA-256 hash of ransom_file.zip?
How up to date is this analysis of ransom_file.zip?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.