Threat LensFile scan report

Is baselib.dll safe?

Verdict
Safe

No antivirus engine detected this verified Unity DLL, and its broad historical prevalence outweighs an uncorroborated sandbox mapping for possible process injection.

All 75 antivirus engines returned without a detection, including 17 tier-1 engines, and the DLL carries a verified Unity Technologies SF signature. It is also broadly distributed and established over time; the isolated T1055 and T1562.001 mappings warrant context but lack corroborating malware evidence.

Use with normal care

Allow it when it belongs to an expected Unity application from a trusted source, while keeping endpoint protection enabled. Investigate the parent application if the DLL appeared unexpectedly or outside its normal installation path.

Read the full analysis
Saved file evidenceAntivirus consensus
0of 75 flagged
Flagged 0No detection 75
Digital specimenbaselib.dlldc51269e0c33371370…bedc7006bafa44
Size395.2 KB
Code signingUnity Technologies SF
SandboxRuntime complete
First seen1y ago
Evidence3 priority signals
0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file.

Recommended next actions

01

Before using

Use it only as part of software obtained from the developer's official site or another source you independently trust.

02

If you already used it

Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.

Chapter 02

Intelligence

The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.

MT AI Engine · Verdict analysis

The reasoning behind this verdict

This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.

94%Confidence
Very high
Analyst conclusion

All 75 antivirus engines returned without a detection, including 17 tier-1 engines, and the DLL carries a verified Unity Technologies SF signature. It is also broadly distributed and established over time; the isolated T1055 and T1562.001 mappings warrant context but lack corroborating malware evidence.

Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
  • behaviour.offensiveTechniques includes T1055 and T1562.001, and MalwareTips.Synth.ProcessInjection fired at high severity; the mapping indicates possible injection or defense impairment but does not establish malicious intent.
  • signing.signerStats contains only 1 historical sample, so the publisher-history evidence is limited despite its 100% safe rate.
  • file.reputation=-1 is a minor negative signal, although it conflicts with the broad prevalence and detection evidence.

These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.

Recommended action

Allow it when it belongs to an expected Unity application from a trusted source, while keeping endpoint protection enabled. Investigate the parent application if the DLL appeared unexpectedly or outside its normal installation path.

Scan transparency

Coverage & freshness

5 of 5 complete

Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.

  • Antivirus

    Complete

    0 of 75 engines flagged the file.

  • Sandbox

    Complete

    1 isolated runtime environment contributed observations.

  • Network

    Complete

    7 contacted hosts were cross-checked.

  • YARA

    Complete

    1 signature or behavior rule matched.

  • External intel

    Complete

    3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.

Chapter 03

Behavior

Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.

Runtime flight recorder

Capture complete
  • 1isolated sandbox run
  • 13MITRE ATT&CK techniques
  • 15spawned processes
  • 7network contacts
  • 31filesystem & mutex artifacts
Chapter 04

Detection & Forensics

Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.

Chapter 05

Safety & FAQ

Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.

What to do now

This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.

  1. Recovery step 01

    Use it only as part of software obtained from the developer's official site or another source you independently trust.

  2. Recovery step 02

    A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.

  3. Recovery step 03

    Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.

Safety FAQ

Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.

7 evidence-based answers
Is baselib.dll safe?
Evidence-based answer
baselib.dll appears safe. 0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged it. It carries a verified digital signature from Unity Technologies SF. Use it only as part of software obtained from the developer's official site or another source you independently trust.
What is baselib.dll?
Evidence-based answer
baselib.dll is a Windows library or loadable module, about 395 KB. Our analysis did not identify a verdict-driving threat signal. It carries a verified digital signature from Unity Technologies SF. A file's name can be reused by different files, so we identify it by its cryptographic hash (below).
How many antivirus engines detected baselib.dll?
Evidence-based answer
None — 0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged baselib.dll. That's reassuring, though it is not proof that a file is safe, so we also weigh its behaviour, identity, and reputation.
Is baselib.dll digitally signed?
Evidence-based answer
Yes — baselib.dll carries a valid digital signature from Unity Technologies SF, which confirms the file hasn't been tampered with since that publisher signed it. A valid signature is a positive signal, but note that malware is occasionally signed with stolen or abused certificates, so it isn't proof of safety on its own.
What is the SHA-256 hash of baselib.dll?
Evidence-based answer
The SHA-256 hash of baselib.dll is dc51269e0c3337137029008a93623ba68935a4792e86df61d9bedc7006bafa44, and its MD5 is 4df02950aba54970ab63f1e519903803. This hash is the file's unique fingerprint — two files with the same SHA-256 are identical. Use it to confirm you're looking at exactly this file (not just one with the same name) when comparing against antivirus databases or a download's published checksum.
Is it safe to use baselib.dll?
Evidence-based answer
Based on the recorded evidence, baselib.dll has a low observed risk and is properly signed. The important caveat is source: make sure you downloaded it from the official website or a trusted store, because attackers sometimes distribute malware-laced copies under a legitimate file's name. If your own antivirus flags it, verify the source and the exact hash before overriding the warning.
How up to date is this analysis of baselib.dll?
Evidence-based answer
This report reflects the scan run on October 7, 2026. Because a file's hash never changes, the identity of baselib.dll is fixed — but antivirus coverage improves over time, so a file that looks clean today can pick up detections later (and vice-versa). If you need the latest picture, MalwareTips staff can re-run the analysis from scratch.
Chapter 06

Community

Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.

The raw file is processed temporarily and is not retained after processing. Its hash and report are public and permanent, so the next person who checks the same file gets an instant answer. Unknown files may be submitted to VirusTotal for analysis. If you ran this file on your computer and are worried, scan your system with an up-to-date antivirus and change critical passwords from a different device.