File scan report
Verdict Safe
Is screentime-
None of the 66 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this ZIP, and external intelligence found no malware match, although its contents lack observation from the test run.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Moderate evidence · No engine flags it, but no publisher signature confirms who made it.
Good practice2 tips
We found nothing harmful in this file.
Open it only if you trust the person or website you got it from.
Keep your security software and system updates switched on.
No scanner can promise a file is 100% safe.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
0 of 66 flagged
- Flagged 0
- No detection 66
- No result 9
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Not run
- First seen 15d ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
3 points against it and 4 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
None of the 66 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the archive, including the represented major antivirus engines, and no MalwareBazaar or malware-specific YARA match was found. Because the hash is and no sandbox run completed, inspect the extracted contents before opening or executing them.
The strongest evidence is the absence of detections across 75 antivirus engines, with no major or independent flags. Research feeds also produced no MalwareBazaar match or malware-specific YARA rule. The file is a ZIP archive, so signing is not applicable and the executable safety of any embedded files cannot be inferred from the archive alone. It was first observed on Oct 11, 2026 from one source, which limits reputation-based confidence but is not itself evidence of malware. No observation from the test run or complete contacted-host reputation result is available. Prior ZIP-only comparisons were all assessed as clean, but file-type similarity provides only weak support.
What We Detected
None of the 66 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the ZIP archive. Avast, BitDefender, ESET-NOD32, Kaspersky, Microsoft, and Fortinet were among the represented engines returning no detection. MalwareBazaar produced no match, and YARAify found no malware-specific rule.
Threat Behavior
No completed sandbox observation is available, so the archive's behavior in the test run and any embedded executables were not observed. A complete reputation check for contacted hosts is also unavailable. The hash was first observed on Oct 11, 2026 from one submitter, leaving little reputation history.
What To Do Now
Confirm that the archive came from the expected source, then extract it without launching embedded content automatically. Scan each extracted executable or script separately and keep security software enabled before opening it.
Where this verdict could be wrong3 caveats
- The archive was first observed on Oct 11, 2026 and has only one submitter, so reputation history is minimal.
- No completed sandbox run examined behavior in the test run, and no complete contacted-host reputation result is available.
- The five prior safe files share only the ZIP file type, not a signer, hash, or other strong identity marker.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- None of the 66 antivirus engines that checked it flagged the archive.
- No major antivirus engines reported a detection.
- No MalwareBazaar match or malware-specific YARA rule was found.
- No malicious file it created is recorded.
- The hash was first observed on Oct 11, 2026 and has only one known submitter.
- No completed sandbox run examined the archive or its extracted contents.
- The long promotional filename does not establish a trustworthy publisher or source.
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. See every source
Chapter 03
Technical details
None of the 66 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · 4 complete · 1 not run · 1 not needed or not applicable. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 11, 2026, 2:40 AM UTC
- SHA-256
dfae6c81dde97335825c0e57fc34e806356796046638c1dfce7bcf7b63600069- SHA-1
58653a75b870e195d59c50083c4602ea1e245447- MD5
1ffbe576169c5cb6cfa6475b505aa3b8
About this file
screentime-to-cash-30-day-money-back-guarantee-don-t-earn-your-19-back-get-a-full-refund-_30-day-money-back-guarantee-don-t-earn-your-19-back-get-a-full-refund-_2a5054d560d751f8.zip is a ZIP file of 55.2 MB.
- Type and size
- ZIP · 55.2 MB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Oct 11, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 1 sourceRarely seen: few people have submitted this exact file.
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75) and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is this file safe?
What is this file?
How many antivirus engines detected this file?
What is the SHA-256 hash of this file?
Is it safe to open or extract this file?
How up to date is this analysis of this file?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.