Threat LensFile scan report

Is Oneclick-V8.3.bat safe?

Verdict
Safe

No antivirus engine detected this established batch file, while one sandbox showed an administrative command and a version check that warrant ordinary caution.

The sample drew no detections from 75 antivirus engines, including 17 tier-1 engines, and no malicious sandbox decision or known-malicious host was recorded. Its use of an administrative command and contact with a suspicious-rated code-hosting endpoint are cautionary, but they are not independently corroborated as malware activity.

Run with normal care

Run it only when obtained from the expected source and after reviewing the batch commands, especially anything requiring elevation. Keep antivirus and endpoint protection enabled.

Read the full analysis
Saved file evidenceAntivirus consensus
0of 75 flagged
Flagged 0No detection 75
Digital specimenOneclick-V8.3.bate12c12287f56d3fbc5…2a6b397f553d11
Size271.0 KB
Code signingNot applicable
SandboxRuntime complete
First seen7mo ago
Evidence3 priority signals
0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged the file.

Recommended next actions

01

Before running

Run it only when it came from the developer's official site or another source you independently trust.

02

If you already ran it

Keep normal device protection enabled and stop if the file behaves unexpectedly.

Chapter 02

Intelligence

The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.

MT AI Engine · Verdict analysis

The reasoning behind this verdict

This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.

78%Confidence
High
Analyst conclusion

The sample drew no detections from 75 antivirus engines, including 17 tier-1 engines, and no malicious sandbox decision or known-malicious host was recorded. Its use of an administrative command and contact with a suspicious-rated code-hosting endpoint are cautionary, but they are not independently corroborated as malware activity.

Where this verdict could be wrong4 caveats
  • The MalwareTips.Synth.UacBypass heuristic fired, but its cited evidence is fltmc alone and the completed sandbox recorded no registry changes, persistence indicators, or malicious sandbox verdict.
  • raw.githubusercontent.com received a suspicious cached-host result, although the observed URL requested Version.md and no host was marked malicious.
  • file.reputation=-11 and several communityComments allege malware or Matrix, but those annotations are inconsistent and lack corroboration from engines or curated external intelligence.
  • All six dropped children have unknown individual verdicts, so droppedChildren.hasMaliciousChild=false does not establish that each child was independently cleared.

These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.

Recommended action

Run it only when obtained from the expected source and after reviewing the batch commands, especially anything requiring elevation. Keep antivirus and endpoint protection enabled.

Scan transparency

Coverage & freshness

4 of 5 complete

Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.

  • Antivirus

    Complete

    0 of 75 engines flagged the file.

  • Sandbox

    Complete

    1 isolated runtime environment contributed observations.

  • Network

    Partial

    1 of 2 contacted hosts were cross-checked; coverage is incomplete.

  • YARA

    Complete

    2 signature or behavior rules matched.

  • External intel

    Complete

    3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.

Chapter 03

Behavior

Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.

Runtime flight recorder

Capture complete
  • 1isolated sandbox run
  • 9MITRE ATT&CK techniques
  • 15spawned processes
  • 2network contacts
  • 7filesystem & mutex artifacts
Recorded behavior

Attack story

Runtime observations grouped by analysis stage. Arrows organize the stages; they do not claim chronology or causality.

ObservedDerived

7 recorded facts from one runtime window. Every fact remains independently traceable in Analyst mode.

Chapter 04

Detection & Forensics

Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.

Chapter 05

Safety & FAQ

Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.

What to do now

This file appears low risk based on the evidence available now.

  1. Recovery step 01

    Run it only when it came from the developer's official site or another source you independently trust.

  2. Recovery step 02

    A clean result reduces known risk, but it cannot guarantee that every new or targeted threat has been detected.

  3. Recovery step 03

    Keep your antivirus and Windows updates switched on so you stay protected.

Safety FAQ

Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.

6 evidence-based answers
Is Oneclick-V8.3.bat safe?
Evidence-based answer
Oneclick-V8.3.bat appears safe. 0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged it. Run it only when it came from the developer's official site or another source you independently trust.
What is Oneclick-V8.3.bat?
Evidence-based answer
Oneclick-V8.3.bat is a script file, about 271 KB. Our analysis did not identify a verdict-driving threat signal. A file's name can be reused by different files, so we identify it by its cryptographic hash (below).
How many antivirus engines detected Oneclick-V8.3.bat?
Evidence-based answer
None — 0 of 75 antivirus engines flagged Oneclick-V8.3.bat. That's reassuring, though it is not proof that a file is safe, so we also weigh its behaviour, identity, and reputation.
What is the SHA-256 hash of Oneclick-V8.3.bat?
Evidence-based answer
The SHA-256 hash of Oneclick-V8.3.bat is e12c12287f56d3fbc525be1a6c5ab7bf3ada3a6272c077dab92a6b397f553d11, and its MD5 is 2988a5f775cacc7999f6057c56c56620. This hash is the file's unique fingerprint — two files with the same SHA-256 are identical. Use it to confirm you're looking at exactly this file (not just one with the same name) when comparing against antivirus databases or a download's published checksum.
Is it safe to run Oneclick-V8.3.bat?
Evidence-based answer
Based on the recorded evidence, Oneclick-V8.3.bat has a low observed risk. The important caveat is source: make sure you downloaded it from the official website or a trusted store, because attackers sometimes distribute malware-laced copies under a legitimate file's name. If your own antivirus flags it, verify the source and the exact hash before overriding the warning.
How up to date is this analysis of Oneclick-V8.3.bat?
Evidence-based answer
This report reflects the scan run on September 21, 2026. Because a file's hash never changes, the identity of Oneclick-V8.3.bat is fixed — but antivirus coverage improves over time, so a file that looks clean today can pick up detections later (and vice-versa). If you need the latest picture, MalwareTips staff can re-run the analysis from scratch.
Chapter 06

Community

Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.

The raw file is processed temporarily and is not retained after processing. Its hash and report are public and permanent, so the next person who checks the same file gets an instant answer. Unknown files may be submitted to VirusTotal for analysis. If you ran this file on your computer and are worried, scan your system with an up-to-date antivirus and change critical passwords from a different device.