Is SPHealthAnalyzer.exe safe?
Six tier-1 engines contribute to 22 of 74 detections, with multiple products independently identifying the Sliver offensive framework or related WinGo trojan code.
The strongest evidence is corroborated identification of Sliver by Sophos, Elastic, ZoneAlarm, and Microsoft, alongside WinGo detections from ESET-NOD32 and Ikarus. This unsigned, newly observed executable has no established publisher history, and no runtime analysis is available to reduce the concern.
e63fd1bdac1d5df208…58f21c75c0cb5eRecommended next actions
Before running
Do not run it. Delete this file from the device, then empty the Recycle Bin or Trash.
If you already ran it
Disconnect from the internet, start a full or offline antivirus scan, then secure important accounts from a clean device.
Intelligence
The saved assessment, checked against the scan evidence and recorded coverage.
The reasoning behind this verdict
This section explains the evidence supporting the verdict and keeps conflicting or missing signals visible.
The strongest evidence is corroborated identification of Sliver by Sophos, Elastic, ZoneAlarm, and Microsoft, alongside WinGo detections from ESET-NOD32 and Ikarus. This unsigned, newly observed executable has no established publisher history, and no runtime analysis is available to reduce the concern.
Twenty-two of 74 antivirus engines flagged the executable, including six independent tier-1 detections. Sophos, Elastic, ZoneAlarm, and Microsoft identify Sliver or a closely named Silver variant, meeting the corroboration requirement for offensive tooling. ESET-NOD32 and Ikarus additionally agree on the WinGo Agent family, although that two-engine family agreement is not a strong tier-1 consensus. The executable is unsigned and appeared in only one submission on its first observed day, leaving no trusted publisher or distribution history to counterbalance those findings. No completed sandbox observation or complete contacted-host reputation result is available, so the assessment rests primarily on static engine evidence.
What We Detected
Twenty-two of 74 antivirus engines flagged SPHealthAnalyzer.exe. Six tier-1 engines detected it, including Sophos as ATK/Sliver-Y, Microsoft as Trojan:Win64/Silver!MTB, ESET-NOD32 as WinGo/Agent.AZM, and Ikarus as Trojan.WinGo.Agent. Elastic and ZoneAlarm provide further Sliver-oriented detections, making the offensive-tool identification independently corroborated.
Threat Behavior
Sliver is an offensive command-and-control framework that can provide remote access and post-compromise capabilities. This payload contains no completed sandbox results, so execution, persistence, or network activity was not directly observed. The contacted-host reputation cross-check was also not completed or saved, meaning no complete network-reputation conclusion is available.
What To Do Now
Do not run the executable. Keep endpoint protection enabled, quarantine or remove the file, and scan any system where it was opened; if execution occurred, isolate that device and investigate for unauthorized access and persistence.
Where this verdict could be wrong5 caveats
- engines.tier1FamilyConsensus identifies WinGo from only 2 engines, so it does not meet the strong-consensus threshold.
- Eight tier-1 engines did not detect the sample, including Avast, AVG, Avira, DrWeb, F-Secure, and Fortinet.
- externalIntel.yaraify.ruleCount=0, externalIntel.circl.hit=false, and externalIntel.malwareBazaar.hit=false; these absences may reflect intelligence coverage rather than benignity.
- peAnalysis.highEntropyCode=false and peAnalysis.likelyPacked=false conflict with several generic packed or obfuscated labels.
- behaviour=null means the Sliver identification is not supported by completed runtime observation.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- Eight tier-1 engines did not detect the sample.
- peAnalysis.highEntropyCode=false and peAnalysis.likelyPacked=false.
- externalIntel.yaraify.ruleCount=0 and externalIntel.circl.hit=false.
- No malicious dropped child is recorded.
- 22 of 74 antivirus engines detected the executable.
- Six tier-1 engines flagged the sample.
- Sophos, Elastic, and ZoneAlarm independently identify Sliver.
- engines.hacktoolConfirmed=true.
- The executable is unsigned despite signing being applicable.
- The file has only one recorded submission and was first observed that day.
Do not execute this file; quarantine or delete it while keeping endpoint protection enabled. If it already ran, isolate the host and perform a full incident-response scan for remote-access activity and persistence.
Coverage & freshness
Complete means the check returned a usable result. It does not mean the file is safe.
Antivirus
Complete22 of 74 engines flagged the file.
Sandbox
PartialRuntime data is present, but no completed sandbox environment is recorded.
Network
Not runNo contacted-host reputation check is recorded.
No timestamp recordedYARA
CompleteRule evaluation completed with no recorded matches.
External intel
Complete3 of 3 independent reference sources completed.
Behavior
Plain-English impact first, then the observed runtime evidence.
Threat context
How hacktools are abused
This is a hacking or cracking tool — the kind used to bypass software licences, generate fake keys, or attack other systems. Even when the tool 'works', these downloads very often carry hidden malware.
Bottom line:Running one means trusting an anonymous author with full access to your PC — rarely worth the risk.
Runtime behavior was not available
The report does not treat a missing runtime observation as a clean result.
Detection & Forensics
Consensus, attribution, signatures, code structure, prevalence, and identity.
Evidence integrity
Chain of custody for the facts preserved in this report.
- 0rule hits recorded
- 22 / 74engines flagged
- 1sources in submission history
Why these facts are shown
Each statement identifies whether it was directly recorded or derived from saved scan facts.
- 01
22 of 74 antivirus engines flagged the file, including ALYac and Arcabit.
Verdict inputView chapterProvenanceObservedSourceAntivirus analysisObserved at - 02
The hash has been submitted 1 time from 1 source.
ProvenanceDerivedSourceSaved report factsObserved at
Detection sources at a glance
Category: hacktool
MalwareBazaar, YARAify, and CIRCL hashlookup completed and returned no entries for this hash.
YARA rules
No matchesThe rule pass completed without a saved public match.
22 of 74 engines flagged this file
View all 74 engine results
Section entropy & packers
No high-entropy executable section or known packer signature was detected. Data and resource sections can still have high entropy without indicating packed code.
How widely this file has been seen
Barely seen in the wild and first surfaced recently. 22 antivirus detections make that low prevalence materially relevant, but rarity alone is not proof of malware.
Fingerprint and provenance
- File name
- SPHealthAnalyzer.exe
- Format
- Win32 EXE
- Code signing
- No verified publisher
- Size
- 35.8 MB
- Last analyzed
- Sep 15, 2026, 1:25 PM UTC
e63fd1bdac1d5df20888f31d8162524c2374ec72b3d4a736d658f21c75c0cb5eSafety & FAQ
Complete recovery guidance and answers for the next decision.
What to do now
This file is dangerous. Treat it as harmful and remove it.
- Recovery step 01
Don't run this file. Delete this file from the device, then empty the Recycle Bin or Trash.
- Recovery step 02
If you already ran it, disconnect from the internet and start with a full antivirus scan or Microsoft Defender Offline scan. If compromise is suspected or the problem persists, use a reputable second-opinion scanner and follow incident-recovery or clean-reinstall guidance.
- Recovery step 03
If you typed any passwords while it was open, change them from a device you trust.
- Recovery step 04
Get a fresh copy from the developer's official site or an official app store.
Safety FAQ
Direct answers grounded in the saved verdict and evidence in this report.
Is SPHealthAnalyzer.exe a virus?
What is SPHealthAnalyzer.exe?
How many antivirus engines detected SPHealthAnalyzer.exe?
What should I do if I already ran SPHealthAnalyzer.exe?
How do I remove SPHealthAnalyzer.exe?
What kind of malware is SPHealthAnalyzer.exe?
What is the SHA-256 hash of SPHealthAnalyzer.exe?
How up to date is this analysis of SPHealthAnalyzer.exe?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.