File scan report
Verdict Suspicious
Is Xeno- v1. 3. 60. zip safe? Treat it as suspicious.
This archive draws 9 of 75 detections, four from major antivirus engines, mostly labelling it adware or unwanted software, with runtime mappings that hint at defense evasion.
Read the whole reasonShow less
Why Suspicious? 9 antivirus engines flag it; nothing else confirms it.
Limited evidence · One sign points to a problem; nothing else confirms it.
Avoid running this archive's contents and keep your antivirus fully enabled. Never disable protection or add exclusions to make a tool work, and scan your system if you have already launched it.
What to do now4 steps
Some signs point to a problem, but nothing confirms it is harmful. Treat it with caution.
What to do
Don't open or extract it unless you're sure where it came from.
Check where you got it: an unexpected attachment, a link someone sent you or a re-upload is a red flag.
If you can't confirm where it came from, delete it. If you need the program, download it again from the publisher's own website.
If you already opened or extracted it
Stop using it, run a full scan with your antivirus and watch for unexpected behavior or security alerts.
Not sure what to do?
Ask the MalwareTips community before you run it. If you already ran it, follow the cleanup guide.
- Ask for free help on the MalwareTips forumWindows malware removal help, answered by volunteers. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
- Remove malware from WindowsStep-by-step cleanup with free tools. (opens malwaretips.com in a new tab)
Paste this report's link in your topic so helpers can see what was found.
Reads the latest antivirus results for this file's hash. Nothing is uploaded.
Antivirus results
9 of 68 flagged
- Flagged 9
- No detection 59
- No result 7
- Code signing Not applicable
- Test run Completed
- First seen 2mo ago
Chapter 02
Why we think so
3 points against it and 3 in its favour, checked against the scan evidence.
The reasoning behind this verdict
Nine of the 68 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this archive, including DrWeb, GData, Ikarus and Sophos, mostly with adware or unwanted-program labels. One sandbox run returned clean, but it mapped techniques for possible injection and impairing security tools. The archive bundles an unsigned tool of the kind often distributed with game-script executors.
Four major antivirus engines flag the archive, which rules out treating it as a simple false positive. Their labels disagree, though, and mostly describe adware or unwanted software rather than a named trojan family. The single sandbox run returned clean and named no injected process. It did map techniques associated with injection and with weakening security defenses, which is a meaningful concern. No external threat-intelligence feed matched the file, and the one contacted domain had no malicious reputation in our cache. Overall the evidence fits risky unwanted software more than confirmed malware.
What We Detected
9 of the 68 antivirus engines that checked it flagged this ZIP archive. Four of them are major: DrWeb (Adware.Downware), GData (Archive.Trojan.Agent), Ikarus (PUA.Win32.Vigua) and Sophos (Generic Reputation unwanted program). Other engines also report adware or unwanted-program labels.
Threat Behavior
One sandbox run returned clean. In that run, bundled runtime DLLs were loaded via rundll32 and one process crashed. The single contacted domain had no malicious or suspicious entry in our cache. External malware feeds returned no match.
What To Do Now
Do not run this tool unless you fully trust its source. Keep your antivirus and Windows Defender enabled at all times. If any tool asks you to turn protection off or add exclusions, treat that as a warning sign and stop. If you already ran it, run a full scan with your security software.
Where this verdict could be wrong2 caveats
- The only sandbox run returned clean and named no injected process, so the defense-evasion and injection mappings are unconfirmed.
- Most flagging engines use adware or unwanted-program labels rather than a named trojan family, which points more toward unwanted software than outright malware.
These are the assessment's weak points. If you believe one applies to your file, report the verdict and we'll re-review it.
- The only sandbox run returned clean
- No external malware feed or researcher rule matched the file
- The contacted domain had no malicious or suspicious reputation in our cache
- Four major antivirus engines flag the archive, mostly as adware or unwanted software
- The archive contains unsigned executable content with no verified publisher
- Community annotations tag the sample with defense-evasion and trojan labels
6 sources checked · all complete. See every source
Chapter 03
What it did in our test
It ran in our isolated test environment; no test environment rated what it did as risky.
Test run summary
Capture complete- 16sandbox rule tags
- 10spawned processes
- 1network contact
- 40filesystem & mutex artifacts
What the test run showed
What the file did on a test computer
Confirmed in the test run
Moderate concern: Ran commands or a script on the test computer.
Moderate concern: Checked whether it was running on a test computer.
Note: Read the user name of the test computer.
Note: Listed the programs running on the test computer.
Note: Deleted files or logs during the test run (installers often clean up after themselves).
Note: Talked to servers over the internet during the test run.
Note: Read basic details of the test computer, such as its Windows version.
Sandbox labels we could not confirm (common in safe files too)
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as code injection, but no injected program was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as weakening security settings; no setting change was recorded.
Not confirmed: A sandbox rule tagged this run as changing how Windows loads code; nothing confirms it.
This file was run on a test computer (a sandbox), not on yours. Labels we could not confirm are listed so you can see them, but they are not treated as evidence against the file.
Recorded behavior
What happened in the test
Grouped by step. The order is not a timeline.
- 1
Input file
The submitted object
- Evidence 1 of 6: FileSeen in the test run
Xeno-v1.3.60.zip
e8ea6ee3a8936390ca866af0340c8512df663bd7ffc71407ee01cb021dbbcf36
Uploaded file
- 2
Processes
What ran
- Evidence 2 of 6: ProcessSeen in the test run
rundll32.exe
"C:\Windows\system32\rundll32.exe" "C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\Xeno-v1.3.60/msvcp140_1.dll",#1
Test run - Evidence 3 of 6: ProcessSeen in the test run
rundll32.exe
"C:\Windows\system32\rundll32.exe" "C:\Users\<USER>\AppData\Local\Temp\Xeno-v1.3.60/msvcrt.dll",#1
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 2
Files
Created or changed
- Evidence 4 of 6: Written fileSeen in the test run
Temp
C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\Temp
Test run - Evidence 5 of 6: Written fileSeen in the test run
e5dbdbb1-8802-44f0-baab-428730a249fb
C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\Temp\e5dbdbb1-8802-44f0-baab-428730a249fb
Test run - +1 more recorded observation
- 1
Network
Hosts contacted
- Evidence 6 of 6: Contacted hostSeen in the test run
x3no.pages.dev
Contacted during the test run.
Test run
6 facts from the test run. See the full activity list.
Includes the sandbox verdicts, 16 mapped techniques, every process, file, registry and network entry and 10 dropped files.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 04
Technical details
9 of the 68 antivirus engines that checked it flag it.
Sources checked
Every check behind this verdict
6 sources checked · all complete. Complete means the check returned a usable result; it does not mean the file is safe.
Engines that flagged it 9
- DrWeb (major engine)Adware.Downware.20251
- GData (major engine)Archive.Trojan.Agent.7QIZXA
- Ikarus (major engine)PUA.Win32.Vigua
- Sophos (major engine)Generic Reputation PUA (PUA)
- GoogleDetected
- K7AntiVirusUnwanted-Program ( 005ce05f1 )
- K7GWUnwanted-Program ( 005ce05f1 )
- MaxSecureTrojan.Malware.8328611.susgen
File fingerprint
- Last analyzed
- Oct 17, 2026, 12:52 AM UTC
- SHA-256
e8ea6ee3a8936390ca866af0340c8512df663bd7ffc71407ee01cb021dbbcf36- SHA-1
7484351e39d6611b512a7e7362ad2a6970d918dc- MD5
c8426d98b2d7521a9a21775da525a608
About this file
Xeno-v1.3.60.zip is a ZIP file of 7.1 MB.
- Type and size
- ZIP · 7.1 MB
- Signer
- Not applicable
- First seen
- Aug 6, 2026On VirusTotal.
- Submitted by
- 2,234 distinct sources
First scanned
Includes every engine result (75), 1 matched signature rule and how widely the file has been seen.
Show the technical evidenceChapter 05
Questions & answers
Short answers to the 6 questions people ask most about this file.
Is Xeno-v1.3.60.zip safe, or is it malware?
What is Xeno-v1.3.60.zip?
How many antivirus engines detected Xeno-v1.3.60.zip?
I already downloaded and opened or extracted Xeno-v1.3.60.zip — what should I do?
What is the SHA-256 hash of Xeno-v1.3.60.zip?
How up to date is this analysis of Xeno-v1.3.60.zip?
Community
Member reviews and reports for this exact file hash.